Horse is out of barn—Iran wants to bar warships from Persian Gulf

by YankeeJim | January 4, 2012 at 11:54 am
106 views | 6 Recommendations | 3 comments

Photos

Not leaving

Not leaving

see larger image

uploaded by YankeeJim

Reading their lips

You don’t have to read the tea leaves, just read the paper and listen to the Iranians, they are preparing for war. Each week, they do something more provocative to ratchet up the situation.

American warships are in the gulf to keep it open as Iran has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz and to conduct sea-war games. If Iran were a more civil nation by world standards, warships would be unnecessary in the Middle East. That is not the case.

Iran is the enemy of peaceful nations and I think they have reached the limit of our tolerance. One false move, and America will be at full throttle against them. The reasons are clear to everyone.

“Iran prepares bill to bar foreign warships from Persian Gulf

By Thomas Erdbrink, Wednesday, January 4, 11:22 AM

Iran's parliament said Wednesday it was preparing a bill that would prohibit all foreign warships from entering the Persian Gulf unless they received permission from the Iranian navy.

The bill, disclosed by the the semiofficial Fars News Agency, surfaced a day after Iran’s armed forces commander warned a U.S. nuclear-powered aircraft carrier not to return to the gulf, remarks that rattled commodities markets and helped drive up oil prices.

The proposed legislation suggested that at least some Iranian officials are serious about trying to stop the U.S. Navy from entering the oil-rich gulf waters. Iranian analysts said the bill probably would not have been introduced if it were not supported by higher authorities.

“If the military vessels and warships of any country want to pass via the Strait of Hormuz without coordination and permission of Iran’s navy forces, they should be stopped by the Iranian armed forces,” Fars quoted lawmaker Nader Qazipour as saying in explaining the bill. He noted that Iran regards the strait as part of its territorial waters and said the bill would be presented to parliamentary leaders next week.

Iranian Foreign Minister Ahmad Vahidi restated Iran's position that “transnational forces” have no place in the region. Vahidi also said Iran is willing to organize joint military drills with neighboring countries, Fars reported Wednesday.

The news agency, which has ties to Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, claimed that the carrier USS John C. Stennis, which steamed out of the Persian Gulf last week, had escaped while being “chased by Iranian warships.” 

The United States has dismissed as overblown rhetoric Iran’s threats to close the strategic Strait of Hormuz, the narrow entrance to the Persian Gulf, in retaliation for Western sanctions over its uranium-enrichment program.

The increasingly bellicose tone from Tehran has coincided with a currency crisis that has forced the government to intervene to prop up the ailing rial. Helping to drive the rial to record lows was U.S. legislation signed Saturday by President Obama that includes a provision for unilateral sanctions against Iran’s central bank.

Iran responded by injecting an additional $200 million into the country’s currency marketsWednesday, Fars reported. While the rial’s rate appeared to stabilize, people involved in trading dollars said they were hanging onto their foreign currency for now.

Many Iranians were trying to buy dollars anyway, but sellers were hard to find.

“Nobody is selling their dollars,” said one exchange office representative who did not want to be identified. “The current rate is artificial.”

The crisis spurred rumors that the job of Central Bank Governor Mahmoud Bahmani was in jeopardy. According to Fars, he has asked for more authority to clamp down on “speculation” against the rial.”

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
2
DrMarty

Jim,

I think it's a case of double-dare-yah.

If I were Iran, I'd prepare for war too.

If I were an ex-vice president and wanted the worth of my investments in a war machine to go up in value, I'd be dropping a bomb now.

If I were the average American, I'd be standing in line at a soup kitchen.

1
YankeeJim

Correct on all points. 

I might be sympathetic with Iran if they were not so blatantly antisemitic, and anti-Western civilization. The fact that they are aggressive and provocative makes me forget empathy and to want to bomb the hell out of them.

Knowing that doing that would ignite WWIII, we must hold until all of Europe, China, and Russia are a part of the coalition to tame Iran.

We really don't have to have warships in the Persian Gulf to accomplish any military objective if needed.

0
batvette

Better yet we  don't need to send anyone in on the ground or occupy the bastards. 

This could get REAL ugly but quick. 

They CAN shut the straits down, from a physical point of view it ain't hard, lay enough mines and they have a lot of shore reinforcements. 

We won't allow it, period. If they try we'll destroy anything they put in the water, unclear what would trigger us to start pounding Iranian soil with bombs. 

Thank goodness Jimmy Carter isn't in office right now. We'd all be speaking Russian! 

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Anonymous
First Flagged at 12:01 PM, Jan 4, 2012 by Anonymous (not verified)
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (6)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from