NP Rank:
How is Russia seeking a peaceful resolution in Syria?
Putin speak
First, there is a dilemma from a US perspective. Syrians elected their president. It is an official government. Syrians protesting the government can theoretically change their government via a process. I think that is what Russians are implying. Would they suggest, “Just like their system?”
America advocates democracy and freedom and does this via foreign policy that rewards behavior aligned with our values. Then again, America rewards countries even when they vote against us most of the time.
Military engagement and intrusion should be a last resort. Sanctions too are a last resort because that may be the first act toward military engagement.
Back to the question, how does Russia envision peaceful resolution? Does it mean simply that people need to submit to authority and reset the table exactly the way it was?
There is no turning back, no rebuilding the Wall, Russia. Russians aren’t keen on Putin either.
“Syrian forces push new assault amid UN diplomacy efforts
Published March 10, 2012
Associated Press
BEIRUT – Syrian troops pushed ahead with a new assault on the northern region of Idlib on Saturday, shelling one of the centers of the uprising against President Bashar Assad's rule and sending families fleeing for safety as armed rebels tried to fend off the attack. Thick black smoke billowed into the sky.
The military operation has raised fears that the regime is planning a new all-out offensive in Idlib like the bloody siege last month that captured a restive part of the city of Homs, further south. While the fighting raged, U.N. envoy Kofi Annan met with Assad in Damascus during a high-profile international mission to mediate an end to the country's yearlong conflict.
The state-run news agency SANA reported that talks between Assad and Annan were "positive" but there were no further details on the meeting.
In the town of Idlib, a number of families fled, clutching their belongings, according to an Associated Press team in the town, the main center of the northern region. A group of women and children huddled with blankets in a room of one building.
Armed opposition fighters dashed through the streets, taking cover behind the corners of buildings in clashes with the troops. Wounded fighters were pulled into trucks to be sped to clinics for treatment. A group of men used shovels to destroy speed bumps along one street to allow ambulances and other rescue vehicles to drive faster.
Military reinforcements have been pouring into Idlib this week, including dozens of tanks and armored personnel carriers, activists said, reporting that dozens have been killed in the area in recent days. Their casualty reports could not be independently confirmed. The moves suggested the regime was now turning its focus on Idlib after recapturing the rebel-held district of Baba Amr in the central city of Homs, in a monthlong assault that reportedly killed hundreds and devastated the district.
The Homs bloodshed further fueled calls among Arab countries and the West for action to stop the crisis, which many fear is moving closer to civil war as the opposition turns more to armed resistance. The U.N. estimates that more than 7,500 people have been killed since Syria launched its crackdown on the uprising, which began a year ago as peaceful protests against Assad. Activists put the toll at more than 8,000.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov sought to defend his country's stance on the crisis before Arab leaders, angered by Moscow's blocking of international pressure on Syria's president to step down. Last month, just as the Homs offensive was heating up, Russia and China vetoed a draft U.N. Security Council resolution that would have supported an Arab League peace plan calling on Assad to hand over his powers.
That brought accusations that Russia, a longtime Assad ally, was giving Assad diplomatic cover to intensify his crackdown.
"We are not protecting any regimes," Lavrov insisted at a heated session of the Arab League in Cairo on Saturday. "We are protecting international law ... We are not looking for a special prize or geopolitical interest here."
He said Russia was trying to prevent "interference in domestic affairs of states, not to mention military interference" -- something he hinted other Arab countries should be concerned about, given the upheaval of the Arab Spring the past year. "We certainly believe that all outside actors must be extremely careful in addressing problems which your countries are facing," he said.
He said Russia was trying to "promote a peaceful resolution" to Syria's crisis and that the immediate mission now is to halt violence and enable humanitarian assistance to reach those in need in Syria.
"If we agree to this, then we shall not really engage in discussing who is to blame" for the bloodshed, he said. "This could be done later by authority or international structure empowered to do this."
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/...violence/#ixzz1oj6Jd0ot”
Crowd Power
-
YankeeJim
Arlington, Virginia, United States


-1.jpg)
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (1)
at 21:35 on March 10th, 2012
Russia is an enigma. I am not ready to put my complete thoughts on the matter to paper per say concerning Russia but I do think at this moment in time only a figure like Putin can keep things from falling apart in Russia and that in itself has a great value to the World.
It is with that in mind that we must consider some cultures with what is said to be authoritarian rule need a slower transition to modern society and modern life. In Syria the official regime has taken the first steps with allowing voted upon changes to the government process. Sometimes baby steps are the right process when we consider countries who took a great leap and are still in chaos and headed for worse situations than have been seen in a lifetime.