NP Rank:
Huff Post: Tony Blankley Reflects On The Founding Fathers & 2010
Tony Blankley of Huffington Post has an OpEd piece today which furthers political and historical thought and casts light on Tea Party movement.
The Declaration of Independence Viewed from 18th Century England
Blankley reminds us that the publishing of the Declaration of Independence 233 years ago by our Founders drew carefully reasoned response from two of the very best minds of the 18th century : Dr. Samuel Johnson (Father of an entire literary age ) and Edmund Burke (the Great intellectual father of modern Anglo-American conservatism).
Samuel Johnson asserted that our Declaration of Independence was no more nor less than "the delirious dream of republican fanaticism" that, if taken to its logical and necessary consequences, would "put the axe to the roots of all government."
More importantly, he raised a serious philosophical question with strong ethical implications: "Why is it that we hear the loudest yelps for liberty from the drivers of negroes?" What Dr. Johnson was implying was that it was the most blatant hypocrisy for slave holders to be crying for liberty, and declaring all men equal in the eyes of the Creator.
But, continues Blankley: Perhaps it was Edmund Burke whose insights were even more profound and more important. He recognized that it was precisely because these men were in fact slave holders that they cried so for liberty: "Those who are free are by far the most proud and jealous of rank and privilege," Burke argued. It was the contrast with the slaves which made them more hungry to be at the opposite end of the spectrum.
What Burke so shrewdly observed and so aptly described in 1775 continue to manifest themselves in American politics today in our current conflicted debate, says Blankley.
Applications in 2010
Burke would know exactly why the European community in 2010 sneer at the American obsession with freedom. Americans may talk about freedom as an abstraction but it is only when that freedom is threatened that politics come to matter.
Burke knew that liberty as an abstraction had no real meaning, and said as much.
The Real and Profound Danger
The Tea Party movement, says Blankley, is a reaction to something which was set in motion by Obama. An intrusion may change the entire tone of discourse if it comes within a crisis. But Blankley warns that this crisis goes way deeper than health care or deficits :
" If the Chinese, by selling off our debt notes, can destroy our economy and way of life at a whim -- as the accumulating debt suggests is possible -- then what had been merely irresponsible, self-indulgent deficit spending by both Republicans and Democrats in the recent past has transformed into a fundamental threat to our liberty and our grandchildren's future."
The Obama administration and the Democrats crossed a line within a dangerous situation already grown fatal.
The first hard step in that defense will be the election in November. The second, even harder step will be the rollback of already enacted debt and damage to our freedom. Defining the extent and detail of the rollback must be the agenda for the government's loyal opposition in this year's election. And the things to which we are loyal are our Constitution, our founding principles and the good institutions and social contrivances brought into being by those principles over our providential history.
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
ari
San Francisco, California, United States -
Edmund Jenks
Los Angeles, California, United States -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States
Recommendations (18)
-
Spydermonkey
huntsville, Alabama, United States -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada -
Rory Cripps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States -
nanute
New York, United States -
Hugh Askew
Omaha, Nebraska, United States









Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (8)
at 11:27 on March 10th, 2010
I think you might mean Tony Blankely
at 11:48 on March 10th, 2010
oh, uh oh, thanks, must change this : (
at 13:45 on March 10th, 2010
Now that you've made the correction, I can say: Consider the source. lol
at 13:51 on March 10th, 2010
Eh?
at 14:04 on March 10th, 2010
Not you! Tony Blankely.
at 15:45 on March 10th, 2010
Could have been worse....she might have quoted Chris Hardball.
at 14:55 on March 10th, 2010
Ha! ; )
at 15:42 on March 10th, 2010
"The Tea Party movement, says Blankley, is a reaction to something which was set in motion by Obama."
I don't know if that's necessarily true. I say this because there was much resentment of the Bush administration on the part of Tea Party types years prior to Obama's emergence. No doubt that it was accelerated to the point that it's now consequent to Obama's election.
But talk radio hosts such as Glen Beck, Laura Ingraham, and especially Michael Savage, were railing against many of Bush's and the Republican's policies for years. And when John McCain became the Republican candidate things really got hot in conservative circles.