NP Rank:
Huge TEA PARTY Win! California Votes NO on Tax Increases
The Southern California Tax Revolt Coalition is reporting that their tax revolt event on May 16 may have been a major contributing factor to Californians voting No on Tax increases to fund out of control spending in California. The California Governor must now come up with budgets cuts that will correlate more closely with revenue already generated by taxpayers.
Tea Party Calendar- NO ON PROPOSITION 1A CALIFORNIA
Gather with us to protest and make sure that people know to vote against Proposition 1A.
Proposition 1A is a deception ploy by the liberal tax and spend politicians in Sacramento. They have given us the largest tax increase in state history for two years. They need our vote to extend it another two years. What they need to do is get their house in order and not tax us to death to fund their social programs which in turn buys them votes. Get the full story at HJTA.ORG or www.noproposition1A.com.
Description The State of California has enacted one of the largest tax increases in it's history. This tax is effective for 2 years. And now the California tax and spend liberals want to increase that term from two to four years by a proposition vote. The only thing they fail to tell us in the voting pamplet is just that, two more years of increased taxes. You can find out all of the CORRECT information at HJTA.ORG
Related:
Crowd Power
-
politisite
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Recommendations (47)
-
jordan
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
Jarrett Martineau
Vancouver, Canada 
Anonymous user
-
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States -
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
Zachary Gauld
Corona, California, United States -
albertacowpoke
Canada -
amyjudd
Vancouver, Canada





Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 17:19 on May 22nd, 2009
The question will be how to deal with reducing the overly generous pensions that municipal employees have gotten over the years.
I don't know how a city can declare itself in receivership and void some of its contracts as a private enterprise would do.
at 20:09 on May 22nd, 2009
I agree. Any Government agency should lead by example and pay what it promised to these retirees. They need to look at this and learn from the mistakes made. Tax and Spend won;t cut it any more but I am sure some Californians are saying... Hey they bailed out the Banks.. How about us.. why should WE pay for services.