NP Rank:
ID Cards:THE Most Pernicious Threat to Our Freedom
OPINION:In a true democracy the State receives permission from the people to exist, but the necessity for each British citizen to bear a state issued national ID Card while in public places throughout Britain turns this long fought-for earmark of free nations on its head, reverses the equation and signals an end to personal freedom. The whole notion of having to produce an ID card simply because it is demanded by a police officer reinforces the false notion, slowly being promoted by various other western governments, of the state generously giving its citizens permission to be on their own streets and in their own public buildings. A similar system, which to any sane, educated freedom lover smacks of the glory days of Adolph Hitler and the Nazis is on its way in the USA as governments move to use fear to control their populations. The governments of Canada and Australia are floating the false need for similar identification as they condition voters into accepting such tools of creeping bureaucratic control. Soon "Your papers please!" will be a common demand from those we pay to protect our freedom, unless we put a stop to this usurpation of our basic rights.
I learned the meaning of civil liberty when I was a correspondent (for a different paper) in Moscow. Reporting on Russia had its unique charms: the merry scorn which officials showed to the very idea of telling journalists, especially foreign ones, anything other than big, fat, Soviet-scale lies; the dispiriting submission of most of the population to constant low-level oppression, as if that was the only way power could be exercised; the disgusting cynicism of the cover-ups that, were they not so appalling, would almost be funny. I remember one case of a border police official with a reputation for fighting corruption being reported as having "accidentally shot himself several times in the head while drunk".But of the petty indignities suffered by Moscow residents who look a bit foreign, the most common is the arbitrary identity check. You are walking down the street and a Kalashnikov-toting policeman pulls you to one side and mutters a single word: "Dokumenty!" Show me your papers. You hand over your passport (no one is fool enough to walk around without it). The bullet-head stares incredulously at it for a while and then thrusts it back at you with a gesture that says, "OK, Brit. Walk on. You were lucky this time."
If you are not British, if you are a Chechen or an Uzbek, or a Russian without the correct stamp indicating your right of residence in the capital, being lucky would mean getting away with paying a bribe. Being unlucky would mean a beating in the back of the police van. And a bribe.
Being stopped for ID, even when your papers are in order, is an intimidating experience. For a second, you shrink dramatically in scale. You are an ant and the boot of arbitrary state power hovers over you. Then you scurry on and gradually resume your stature as an autonomous individual, but not a free one.
The essence of the identity check is to reinforce a false idea of permission. The street belongs to the state and you need to prove your right to walk down it. In Russia, that relationship is hardly questioned by citizens. Of course you depend on the Kremlin for its indulgence in allowing you to move around the country.
News Tools
July 7, 2008 at 04:32 pm by moonwolf, 304 views, 13 comments



Add a comment
Comments (13)
at 17:45 on July 7th, 2008
moonwolf, I like this story. It's good stuff. We have been using ID cards in Taiwan for a really long time already. The ones they are talking about in the article seems to be a lot more of a hassle. Also it is quite dangerous when you lose your ID.
at 18:06 on July 7th, 2008
Thanks Jeff!
In Britain, Europe, The USA, Canada, and Australia it has been anathema to even suggest such a thing for all of my 59 years. All our laws forced law enforcement officers to produce proof of criminal activity or proof of a clear criminal intention before they had a right to interfere with a citizen in a public place. Since 911 there has been a constant erosion in our legal protections.
at 18:11 on July 7th, 2008
moonwolf, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 18:23 on July 7th, 2008
moonwolf, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 05:21 on July 8th, 2008
moonwolf, I like this story. It's good stuff. Having verifiable I.D. is a good thing. Hopefully, someday, everyone will have to lay his cards on the table. Companies should have to identify themselves publicly and their offshore affiliated enterprises (to see where our jobs are going); law firms like The Cochran Firm should have to identify all their REAL offices and explain any special composition to the public; elected representatives who vote to equip police officers with Taser guns should have to declare if they have any investments that stand to gain thereby, people protesting troop withdrawal from war zones should have to identify their security holdings and profits from investments that enrich them during times of war . . . . Yes, let us lay all cards on the table and identify ourselves! Full disclosure can be a good thing!
http://www.askquestions.org/details.php?id=26&gclid=CICcwv36r5QCFRZjnAodNloSfg
at 05:59 on July 8th, 2008
Good point, duo! I believe we have arrived in "the age of accountability" because it is relatively easy to research anyone's life. We should have the right to know whether people are being duplicitous and dishonest, especially in public office. There are a lot of predators, privateers, parasites and pushers breaking the rules of civilized society out there, and you can be sure that the 'Lobbyocracy' is top of the list.
at 20:17 on July 8th, 2008
Thanks Duo!
Nice notion but it will never happen. As long as we live in a top-down hierarchical system we will be the only ones forced to put our cards on the table, or into the handcuffs for us!
at 05:53 on July 8th, 2008
moonwolf, I like this story. It's good stuff.
A sad, and oh-so-true report, Moonwolf, ...and from the Guardian too!
at 05:58 on July 8th, 2008
Are you not a Guardian-believer, Maireid?
at 06:02 on July 8th, 2008
Just my way of saying Moonwoolf's comment is spot on too, generaldecay - and the Guardian report was 'moving'! ...the paper comes and goes, depending on the subject and writer - but I like it generally! :)
at 06:29 on July 8th, 2008
Ah, I see! Yes, it's hit and miss. As most pubvlications are, alas.
at 05:58 on July 8th, 2008
moonwolf, good stuff. And very, very true.
- reply
Anonymous (not verified)at 14:57 on July 9th, 2008
God will have the final say in all of this.