NP Rank:
The IED Plus Up
Yesterday’s NY Times reported that the Pentagon was nearing a decision to send an additional 3,000 US troops to counter the growing improvised explosive device (IED) threat in Afghanistan. This addition would be irrespective of whatever GEN McChrystal asks for later this month as part of his overall strategy for the region. The IED problem has grown , according to Pentagon estimates, 400% over the past two years. It was further stated by a Pentagon spokesman that the majority of deaths are now caused by IED’s. This disturbing trend demonstrates the nature of the Taliban strategy in Afghanistan today which is avoiding direct confrontation with the larger number of troops that are now in Afghanistan in favor of remotely detonated devices. This being the first case where one can point to a similarity between Iraq and Afghanistan, it shows that there is “mirror imaging” happening in respect to how insurgencies can learn from previous experiences. It has always been a dangerous game in trying to compare these two theaters of war but in this particular case there are lessons learned scenario where the Taliban are employing the tactics that where employed in Iraq. It was just two years ago the IED’s where rare instances in Afghanistan, but today it accounts for the majority of violence inflicted upon Coalition forces. The plus up in an anti-IED force is both needed but worrisome as it appears the war has entered a new phase of violence at a time that Afghanistan can hardly afford it.
Crowd Power
-
MilanSturgis
Washington, District Of Columbia, United States
Recommendations (37)
-
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan 
Anonymous user
-
a211423
Clearlake, California, United States -
Bunk
London, United Kingdom -
albertacowpoke
Canada -
Blue Crush
Toronto, Canada -
Rory Cripps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (3)
at 04:01 on September 14th, 2009
This has been the strategy of the Taliban, when they realized that they cannot effectively meet NATO forces with their stand-off weapons and obvious air superiority. The Taliban are very effective with their IEDs. The disturbing situation is that they are now reaching beyond the Southern provinces of Hellmand and Khandahar. Another Canadians soldier was killed Monday when his armoured vehicle hit a roadside bomb.
at 08:41 on September 14th, 2009
Making and disseminating IEDs is similar to the guerrilla tactics used by the Vietcong against Americans in Viet Nam.
Vietcong groups tended to be local converts and far less confident and trained than the professional soilders. For the most part, recruits were young teenagers, and while many were motivated by idealism, others had been pressured or shamed into joining. They were not as well equipped as regular soilders, so they developed their own means to fight heavily armed and well-trained American soldiers.
Many weapons, including booby traps and mines, were homemade in villages. The materials ranged from scavenged tin can to discarded wire, but the most important ingredients were provided by the enemy. In a year, dud American bombs could leave more than 20,000 tons of explosives scattered around the Vietnamese countryside. After air-raids, volunteers retrieved the duds and the dangerous business of creating new weapons began.
Local forces also designed primitive weapons, some designed to frighten intruders, but others were extremely dangerous. "Punji traps" -- sharp spikes hidden in pits -- could easily disable an enemy soldier. Punjis were often deliberately contaminated to increase the risk of infection.
The strategy of avoiding direct confrontation, like you state, is similar to guerrilla tactics and is becoming more effective as the war continues, and as they discover more ways to deliver IEDs.
at 09:09 on September 14th, 2009
i do wonder if we will ever get out of there.