If I were running for President of the USA... Part 1 of 3
I sometimes wonder what planet or alternate reality our major media is allegedly reporting on. I listen to the debates, hear the polls and watch the news and just shake my head. I believe that by the time you, the average rank and file citizen, is done reading my agenda, you also will begin shaking your head whenever you hear major media spin its perspective on the politics of our country.
In my humble opinion, the single issue of highest importance to voters this year should be:
“Do you want to be managed and manipulated by the politicians like cattle, trained seals and/or Pavlov’s Dog or; Do you want to be represented like sovereign citizens of the country as the Founding Father’s intended?”
In short, I believe the rallying cry of WE THE PEOPLE should be:
“Hell no! No more status quo!”
As I sit down to write this article, I cannot help but wonder how all persons running for president do not write and publish a similarly intentioned article as one of their first acts in making their bid for president. What better way to set the tone of their campaign? What better way to lay out to WE THE PEOPLE their vision for our country? What better way for a candidate to demonstrate their intent to keep their word? What better way for WE THE PEOPLE and the candidates themselves, to measure their success or failure than by having their vision, promises and pledges reduced to writing? Isn’t this just Common Sense?
Instead, America is subjected to some bizarre political Shivaree. During the course of this dragged out shivaree, the political parties and major media “frame” the election and attempt to convince WE THE PEOPLE that the issues the “powers that be” want us to base our voting decisions upon are, or should be, the most important to the majority of WE THE PEOPLE.
[Article Continues below almost universal translator]
Vertaal na Afrikaans |Translate në shqip | ترجمةإلىالعربية | Թարգմանելհայերեն| Azərbaycan Tərcümə | Euskal Translate| Перавесці на беларускай| বাংলাঅনুবাদ | Превод на български| Traduir al català | 转换为中文（简体)|翻譯到中國（傳統） | Prevedi na hrvatskom | Translate to Czech | Oversæt til dansk | Te vertalen naar het Nederlands | Tõlgi eesti | Isalin sa Filipino sa| Käännä Suomen | Traduire en français | Traducir a Galego | თარგმნეთსაქართველოს| Übersetzen auf Deutsch | Μετάφραση στα ελληνικά| ગુજરાતીઅનુવાદ | Tradui kreyòl ayisyen | תרגוםעברית | सेहिन्दीअनुवाद| Fordítás magyar | Þýða til Íslenska | Terjemahkan ke bahasa Indonesia| Aistrigh go Gaeilge| Traduci in italiano | 日本語に翻訳| ಕನ್ನಡಗೆಭಾಷಾಂತರಿಸಿ | 한국어번역| Translate to Latine | Tulkot uz latviešu | Latvian Tulkot uz latviešu| Versti į lietuvių| Преведете на македонски| Terjemah ke Bahasa Malaysia| Ittraduċi għall-Malti| Oversette til norsk |ترجمهبهفارسی| Przekłada się na polskim | Traduzir para Português | Traduceţi în română |Перевести на русскую|Преведи на Српском | Preložiť na slovenský |Prevedi v slovenski | Traducir al español | Tafsiri kwa Kiswahili | Översätt till svenska | தமிழ்மொழிபெயர்க்கவும்| తెలుగులోఅనువదించడానికి | แปลเป็นไทย| Çevir Türkçe>| Перекласти українською| اردومیںترجمہکریں | Dịch cho người Việt Nam| Cyfieithu i'r Gymraeg | איבערזעצןצוייִדיש |
Political Party Questionnaires are generally multiple choice with generic answers and no opportunity to choose “none of the above” or suggest a different priority from those suggested. And then major media follows the lead of the political elite and proceeds to frame the debates and the elections accordingly. In this format, elections become more a matter of almost subliminal manipulation and management of WE THE PEOPLE with Edward Bernays http://bit.ly/nY9BjW style techniques rather than elections reflecting the will and best interests of rank and file Americans. And, in reflection, all of these machinations can be seen to be actually intended to maintain the corrupt, tyrannical status quo.
That having been said, let this candidate suggest that all candidates draft and publish a statement of priorities such as this. If for no other reason than because it well serves the best interest of WE THE PEOPLE, the rank and file sovereign citizens of America and allows us to hold our elected officials accountable. (And imagine how many commercials you would not have to see to determine how to vote if every candidate, followed this candidate’s lead in reducing their vision and priorities to writing)
But if you prefer the current status quo of being manipulated and managed like cattle, trained seals and/or Pavlov’s Dog, stop reading now.
CRITICAL THINKING NOTICE
This candidate advises you as no other politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this candidate... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust. And then, only after you could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.
In my administration, the priority will be to protect the 300 million citizens of our country from corrupt elected officials and government bureaucrats, rather than protect a few corrupt elected officials and government bureaucrats from the legitimate grievances of WE THE PEOPLE. In my view, systemic corruption permeates all levels of our government. And it is the cumulative effect of this systemic corruption which has caused the financial and moral bankruptcy we are facing.
I am not running to be popular;
I am not running to the most exciting, most lovable or the most colorful president;
I am not running with an eye toward enjoying the accoutrements of aristocracy;
I am not running with an eye toward personal wealth;
I am not running with an eye toward re-election;
I am running to represent WE THE PEOPLE.
I am running to save our country from collapse, to pursue the long neglected best interests of rank and file Americans and to restore America to its former position as the undisputed cultural, socio-economic, military leader of the world.
AGENDA AND PRIORITIES
As president, I would look to roll back all of those small incremental encroachments of liberty, trespasses of the Rule of Law and expansions of Government Power which are easily obfuscated by the ruling class, but whose cumulative effects are easily recognized when published together in the proper context.
“Since the general civilization of mankind, I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpations…”
James Madison - Speech at the Virginia Convention to ratify the Federal Constitution
1) United We Stand;
2) Restore Adherence To The Constitution And “Certain Unalienable Rights” Guaranteed By Natural Law, The Constitution And The Bill Of Rights;
3) Government Transparency, Accountability and Reform (TAR);
4) Judicial Transparency, Accountability and Reform (TAR);
5) Citizen Anti-Corruption Committee;
7) Repeal and rescind legislation and policies which caused economic downturn and job loss;
8) Election Reform;
9) End or Nationalize the Federal Reserve Bank System;
10) Balanced Budget without additional debt;
11) Social Security and Medicare ;
12) Legislation must say what it means and not be a potpourri of pork, earmarks and/or unrelated legislation;
13) Line Item Veto
14) Elimination and Restructuring of Cabinet Departments;
15) Internet – Government Hands off and Libraries;
16) Public Education Reform;
17) Health Care;
18) Expanded Whistleblower Protection for Government inspectors and Subcontractors;
19) Welfare Reform – Negative Income Tax
20) Anti New World Order (NWO) aka One World Government (OWG) Policy
21) Anti Balkanization Policy
A) English as the Official Language
22) Diversity Synergy;
24) War on Drugs;
25) War on Terror;
50) Additional Recognition Ceremonies
51) Encourage Absolutely Voluntary Standard Prenuptial agreements
52) Encourage Abosolutely Voluntary Standard Pre-Coital Agreement for unmarried relationships in event of pregnancy and/or STD’s
96) Civil Unions;
98) Amnesty and expungement – for all persons with up to 2 non-violent convictions for drug related offenses related to personal use (as defined by the DOJ);
THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS
1) UNITED WE STAND
It deeply saddens me to have our elected officials and political parties whip various groups of WE THE PEOPLE into a frenzy against other groups of WE THE PEOPLE. This all for the selfish purpose of dividing and conquering WE THE PEOPLE as part of their strategy to get re-elected and maintain power and control. Worse yet, our elected officials have caused and/or have been unable to resolve most of the difficult issues facing our country. Often the political parties deliberately drag issues out just because they so great a source of campaign contributions.
With this in mind, I begin with the premise that WE THE PEOPLE, the rank and file sovereign citizens of America are more alike than the politicians and political parties would wrongfully have you believe we are different. And with this premise, I would seek to tap into the wellspring of synergy residing in the minds of our country’s some 300 million fellow citizens. Further, in so doing, I would hope to unify WE THE PEOPLE and fundamentally alter the current culture of negativity and non-constructive debate which degrades each citizen’s quality of life.
There is a technique known as Nominal Group Process (NGP) which is used to bring consensus and unity in organizations with discord and acrimony....
Click here to continue reading for free -> http://exm.nr/wOA6Zn
Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.
Please join with me in mutually pledging to each other and our fellow citizens our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor to our mutual endeavors of restoring liberty and economic opportunity to WE THE PEOPLE as our Founding Fathers envisioned and intended. [Last sentence, US Declaration of Independence (http://bit.ly/ruPE7z )]
Next, it has came to this author's attention that many local papers will not run letters to the editor, Op Ed pieces and articles that do not conform to the perspective of the local "Powers that be". If you have a letter to the editor that relates to this article, feel free to post it as a comment, noting that the local news source refused to run it. As long as it conforms with general decorum and is plausible, very rarely will we refuse to publish it. If you have unrelated subject matter and/or video and/or audio that you believe we would be interested in based (based on our prior articles), email it here. Send video/audio in common Internet formats or with Youtube.com links. Do not send video in Public Access TV and/or Cable formats. Our philosophy is that more open public dialogue is better than less public dialogue.
This article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar
Keep Fighting the Good Fight!
Those were my thoughts.
The Cynical Patriot
WE THE PEOPLE TAR
Political Organization http://www.facebook.com/pages/WE-the-People-TAR/143518522391810 Group http://www.facebook.com/groups/116494971778086/
Examiner.com - Express Yourself
Write for Examiner.com
Just Click here http://exm.nr/ljgfmD
Republic for united State of America #RuSA
End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System)
National http://bit.ly/ta3Rju Minneapolis http://bit.ly/tjZJKF
Lawless America / Get A Grip America
Justice in Minnesota #JIM
Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
Get out of our House #GOOOH
Committees of Safety
History of here http://bit.ly/qscBHc
United States Militia #USM
Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.