NP Rank:
Imperial Sugar Refinery Explosion...Update
Six weeks have passed now since the horrific Imperial Sugar Refinery
combustible dust explosion that occurred in Port Wentworth, Georgia on
the evening of February 7. Imperial Sugar CEO John Sheptor allowed
reporters an up close view of the blast site while investigators took a
break during the Easter weekend.
3/21/08 Today News Threes Alice Massimi and photojournalist Art Ottimo were able to get a close-up look at the destruction caused by this horrific incident.
Combustible
dust explosions and fires are a regular occurrence at numerous
manufacturing and processing facilities across the United States and
the Imperial Sugar incident is not an isolated case. Already 20 combustible dust related fires and explosion have occurred since the explosion in Port Wentworth.
3/18/08 MUSKEGON COUNTY
Muskegon firefighters responded at 1:52 a.m. to the plant at 1867
Huizenga, where they discovered the plant's "dust collector" had caught
fire, said Fire Marshall Major Metcalf.
It's unclear why the device -- located outside the plant --
malfunctioned
Combustible dust fires originating in dust collectors occur with
regularity and without proper voluntary detection, isolation,
ventilation, and suppression measures in conjunction with the
regulatory good housekeeping requirements additional incidents, will
continue.
Just abiding by current combustible dust industry standards and OSHA
regulations is not enough as Imperial Sugar CEO John Sheptor suggests,
with all good intentions
PORT WENTWORTH, GA (WTOC) 3/21/08 -
"We will rebuild this facility to the best knowledge we have with
regard to the management of combustible dust, whether that be a regulation or industrial standard and by all means we believe we were operating according to these codes and standards previously," he said.
Rebuilding the sugar plant in compliance to
current OSHA combustibles dust regulations will only prolong the
situation of the continual occurrence of more combustible dust
explosions.Especially since abiding to National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)codes on combustible dust is only voluntary.
At a recent congressional hearing of the House Committee of Education and Labor concerning the introduction of the Combustible Dust Explosion and Fire Prevention Act (H.R. 5522), David Sarvadi a lobbyist and attorney representing United States Chamber of Commerce
the world's nationwide largest not-for-profit business federation, of
3,000,000 businesses, didn't believe that a mandatory OSHA combustible
dust standard, which includes NFPA combustible dust explosion
preventative and mitigative measures was a good idea.
Meanwhile combustible dust explosions are still occuring
3/13/08 By TOM QUIGLEY The Express-Times
HIGH BRIDGE,NJ Fire erupted Wednesday inside an enclosed dust collector
in a metal-grinding room at the Custom Alloy plant on Washington
Avenue, borough Fire Chief Jeffrey Smith said.
The severity of the situation is not just solely on the protection
of workers in the workplace from the unknown dangers of seemingly
harmless combustible particulate solids and the combustible dusts that
are generated. But now our nation's firefighters are at risk when
fighting a structure fires where unrecognized combustible dusts are
generated and primary and secondary dust explosions can occur during
the deflagration event.
And so the saga continues:
3/10/08 WCCO.com OAK PARK HEIGHTS, Minn. (AP)
― Xcel Energy is shutting down its King plant in Oak Park
Heights after a fire and possible explosion in a building near the
coal-fired plant.
This was the second combustible dust explosion
of coal dust within three months at the same facility. Currently,
Minnesota is under a voluntary state OSHA program and doesn't even have
an emphasis program regarding combustible dusts. So how is it that
future preventable and predictable combustible dust explosions and
fires can be diminished if there is no nationwide mandatory protective
standards?
Resources:
NFPA 654: Standard
for the Prevention of Fire and Dust Explosions from the Manufacturing,
Processing, and Handling of Combustible Particulate Solids
News Tools
March 22, 2008 at 02:40 pm by John Astad, 869 views, 5 comments
Crowd Power
-
John Astad
Santa Fe, Texas, United States






Add a comment
Comments (5)
at 14:57 on March 22nd, 2008
John Astad, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 20:59 on March 22nd, 2008
Thanks for the update, very comprehensive coverage!
at 21:20 on March 22nd, 2008
Thanks Amy.
This is only the tip of the iceberg of the daily hidden dangers that workers are exposed to concerning the unknown hazards of combustible particulate solids and the explosive atmospheres of combustible dust that is generated during the manufacturing and handling process in the food, plastic, metal, rubber, and wood industries.
In many instances it only takes one spark of static electricity at the millijoule level to set off an explosion such as one electron spinning off from 500,000 atoms.
at 21:24 on March 22nd, 2008
Those are very scary statistics you are pointing out. I had no idea a job of that nature was so dangerous.
at 21:40 on March 22nd, 2008
Thats okay as no one else has any idea of the hazards either and thats the problem. Vital fire and explosive information and data such as minimum explosive concentrations (MEC), minimum ignition temperatures (MIT), and minimim igniniton energy (MIE) is not even provided in the required Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) in the workplace.
To give you an idea of minimum ignition temperture, an extinguished match is approximately 500° centigrade which is above the temperature that many combustible dusts will ignite.
Combustible Dust Explosion and Fire Website