NP Rank:
Important WMD Reminder on Page 6
Opinion. It was on page 6 of my daily newspaper that an important reminder of Saddam’s capacity for WMD was published: the movement in secrecy of 550 tons of ‘yellowcake’ uranium from Iraq to Canada on July 5. 550 tons! Can they really continue their lies about no possibility of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Saddam’s Iraq? I know they will try to spin this, but can any honest person now still maintain that Saddam was not able to reconstitute his nuclear weapons’ capability left to his own devices? Can any honest person continue the nonsense of “Bush lied”? Although U.N. inspectors had previously documented and secured the material, are we supposed to forget that Saddam threw out all the U.N. inspectors in 1998, or that we found buried centrifuges after we went in there?
Here we have a cruel dictator who imagines himself the new Saladin, who finances and supports the training of several Islamic terror groups, who has employed WMD against Iran and his own people, who pays the families of Palestinian homicide bombers $25,000 each time innocent Israeli women and children are massacred, who has previously created a nuclear weapons factory (destroyed by the Israelis, thank God,) who is sitting on 550 tons of yellowcake uranium, who has enrichment centrifuges (God knows how many) buried in various locations, who has thrown out the inspectors, who is bragging to the world of his WMD capability and who is shooting at our aircraft as they try to enforce the no-fly provisions of the truce agreement.
This is the man, Saddam, who sits in the middle of the biggest pool of oil in the world, the one resource the developed world must have for its survival – a man who thirsts to control all of that oil – and who previously tried to do just that.
I know it will never be enough for the liberal ideologues and the purely partisan politicians, but I hope that this reminder, together with the enlightening 60 Minutes program and the follow-up articles on Saddam’s interviewer will end the “Bush Lied” nonsense – at least among those political opponents of Bush’s who are fair-minded.
Mr. Piro, an FBI agent assigned to question Saddam over many months, revealed on 60 Minutes that Saddam deliberately foisted on the world the deception that he had many kinds of weapons of mass destruction - chemical, biological and nuclear. This deception took many forms and was carried out because Saddam feared most an attack from Iran, and he thought it was the only thing that would prevent that from happening.
He (Saddam) also told the interviewer that, although he had dismantled his WMD program, he had left in place equipment, scientists and programs so that he could reconstitute his WMD when the world lost interest, and that he intended to do just that.
Another important point we learned from Saddam via Piro was that Saddam expected only a short-lived air attack from the United States, because of the many times the U.S. had, in the past, responded in this manner regardless of the provocation. He was the most surprised man on the planet when the U.S. actually moved troops into Iraq and went after him.
Report: Uranium Stockpile Removed From Iraq in Secret U.S. Mission
July 05, 2008 AP (Excerpt)
“The last major remnant of Saddam Hussein's nuclear program — a huge stockpile of concentrated natural uranium — reached a Canadian port Saturday to complete a secret U.S. operation that included a two-week airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing two oceans.
The removal of 550 metric tons of "yellowcake" — the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment — was a significant step toward closing the books on Saddam's nuclear legacy. It also brought relief to U.S. and Iraqi authorities who had worried the cache would reach insurgents or smugglers crossing to Iran to aid its nuclear ambitions.”
I suppose that the Taliban and other groups out to destroy us were also surprised when an American President unleashed a little bit of the might of the United States to remove this ogre and offer the Iraqis and the region of the Middle East a chance for the freedom and the pursuit of happiness for which our own Founding Fathers pledged their fortunes, their lives and their sacred honor, while at the same time removing the threat to Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Dubai and perhaps even Iran, if the rest of the world twiddled its thumbs, as usual.
News Tools
July 7, 2008 at 01:38 pm by joellerose, 454 views, 17 comments
Crowd Power
-
joellerose
Orlando, Florida, United States




Add a comment
Comments (17)
at 13:41 on July 7th, 2008
Bush lied.
at 16:18 on July 7th, 2008
Bush was right hurts doesn't it. Just the fact that we took all that oil away from the crooks at the UN must hurt liberals.
at 16:33 on July 7th, 2008
I see emotionally needy sycophants saying Bush was right. That is all. This is uranium the UN already knew about.
What bloody oil? If anything, the knothead has handed over the oil to Iran. Guess what? Iraq says it wants us out and it wants the oil. Heckuva job, George.
Where are the oil revenues to pay off our soaring budget?
Where is the compassion . . . oh wait. Forget that. I forgot what room I was in.
at 17:36 on July 7th, 2008
The fact that things are going better in Iraq has some losing it. With some nothing Bush does will ever be good. They hated Bush so much they openly rooted for the enemy.
at 18:03 on July 7th, 2008
It must be very difficult to make good decisions when, in a report like this for example, one can only see and absorb points which agree with preconceived notions. The yellowcake, which I am told at 550 metric tons is enugh for about 40 Hiroshima sized bombs, came under the control of Saddam in 1998. When something horrible doesn't happen because a leader exercised wisdom and judgment to prevent it, the second-guessers and naysayers always come out.to complain.
at 19:01 on July 7th, 2008
So what is it dunkelberg? Either we were in it to steal Iraq's oil or we are stupid for not stealing their oil - get your story straight.
at 13:49 on July 7th, 2008
joellerose, I like this story. It's good stuff. Now why are you surprised? Did I not say in two other articles that one will be hard pressed to find the story in their paper? Did you paper carry the PM of Iraq's weekend statements about the defeat of terrorists? That is where NP comes in. Good job on your article
at 14:50 on July 7th, 2008
but why has it been kept secret? Why didn't they produce the proof? I always believed we gave Saddam too much time to hide his weapons. and what about the truck convoy to Syria that was spotted by satellite?
at 18:09 on July 7th, 2008
Rene, the reports I have read indicate that the Bush Administration was very concerned to keep this secret and under close guard so that none of this material would be stolen or diverted to terrorists. I have also read many reports about truck convoys to Syria, but none of them have had enough credible corroboration to be accepted as fact..
at 18:28 on July 7th, 2008
Incredible! He let everyone slam him.
at 18:49 on July 7th, 2008
Sometimes when you're dealing with matters of high security you just have to do what you have to do--and let people attack as they will. There's a larger responsibility at hand with some materiels and equipment than just politics or protecting one's ego.
at 16:14 on July 7th, 2008
joellerose, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 18:59 on July 7th, 2008
joellerose, I like this story. It's good stuff.
The people who are now saying that Iraq never poised a threat were the same people during the '30s who said that Hitler was not a threat. While believing that other countries are "good" is seductive and requires no tough choices on our part it is never the case. There are always some very bad apples out there and Saddam was one of them.
at 19:06 on July 7th, 2008
joellerose, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 05:43 on July 8th, 2008
joellerose, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 20:38 on July 13th, 2008
Wow, you need to brief the Pentagon on this. I don't even think they know about it. I actually looked into intel reports on this, and once again, unsubstantiated reports of, haha, yes the oh so dangerous "yellowcake." I know just from your reports that you have no international experience or military intel experience.
at 06:42 on July 14th, 2008
"The shipment this spring of 550 metric tons of yellowcake uranium from Iraq argues that the United States and its allies were right to be very worried about Saddam Hussein’s nuclear-weapons intentions.
Working in secret with the new Iraqi government for fear that terrorists might interfere with the operation, the United States spirited the material out of the country and sold it to a Canadian company that will use it to produce nuclear power, officials revealed early this month.
That’s a lot of uranium — enough, by some estimates, to build 100 nuclear weapons. Transporting it required 37 military flights.
U.S. soldiers discovered the stockpile of yellowcake at the former Tuwaitha nuclear complex soon after the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Looting villagers had already removed some of the barrels, apparently intending to reuse them as drinking-water cisterns. Because the uranium is radioactive, U.S. officials feared it might be stolen and employed in “dirty bombs,” or worse, if not guarded.
The presence of so much uranium, of course, renews questions about what Saddam intended to do with it. The complex was dismantled after the Gulf War in 1991, and the International Atomic Energy Agency was reportedly keeping watch over the material.
But it never ordered the yellowcake removed. And, before the 2003 Iraq war, Saddam was clearly angling to thwart the weapons-inspections regime implemented after the Gulf War. His use of bribes through the oil-for-food racket and his open defiance of the IAEA, leading to multiple U.N. resolutions sanctioning him, suggest strongly that he was up to something very nasty — perhaps biding his time until he could proceed with building nuclear weapons.
This is not the first time that yellowcake uranium has been linked to Saddam’s name. President Bush disclosed that British intelligence sources believed that Saddam was trying to buy more yellowcake from the government of Niger before the war. Ambassador Joseph Wilson, husband to former CIA operative Valerie Plame, famously traveled to Niger and proclaimed in a New York Times article that there was no truth to the report, lending comfort to those who argued that President Bush “lied” about Saddam’s intentions. The facts of such clandestine operations are not clear, however, even to intelligence experts, and Saddam got 550 tons of the stuff in earlier years from somewhere.
As Reuters reported in an article about the recent transfer, “no evidence has been found that Saddam continued a nuclear-weapons program after 1991.” But Saddam had some reason for defying inspections and maintaining his huge stockpile of uranium, in a country whose energy needs could be met easily by its abundant oil. Trusting him under such circumstances would have been reckless.
Whether war was the appropriate response or not, we are certainly all better off having that uranium used for peaceful purposes, producing electricity in Canada rather than adding to the proliferation of nuclear threats in the explosive Mideast."
Editorial in Providence Journal