NP Rank:
Indian Muslim Women come out in support of 'Hijab': RSA
Controversial topic, Muslim women should wear 'Hijab'(Burqa) or not?
Of course they will decide it they want to wear Burqa or not. Nobody have any right to say what a Muslim women should wear.
Hundreds of women shown solidarity for the cause of wearing Burqa in South Africa.If Muslims do not interfere with any religion, at-least in case of clothing culture, why should anyone pass resolution what muslim should wear.
Hundreds of Indian Muslim women here have come out in support of Muslim woman's right to wear 'Hijab,' a traditional headgear, worldwide.
Over 500 women visitors pledged their support for an international campaign asserting Islamic tradition of wearing Hijab during a live broadcast by the Johannesburg-based radio service Channel Islam International (CII) in the mainly Indian area of Lenasia over the weekend.
Muslims across the world are protesting against a ban on 'Hijab' in France. The CII gave a free scarf to every woman who voiced her support to the campaign.
"Although we are fortunate to have strong constitutional support for the rights of Muslim women in South Africa to wear the Hijab, it is surprising that countries with supposedly far longer democracies are now denying this right to the extent that innocent Muslim women are now coming under attack," CII Director Ashraf Seedat told PTI.
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States
Recommendations (57)
-
Rory Cripps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States -
Barry ORegan
Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
israeli.agent
India -
Sputnic
London, United Kingdom
-
Mary Richard
Toronto, Canada -
a211423
Clearlake, California, United States -
jigo
Zsaka, Hajdu-Bihar, Hungary -
Barbara McPherson
Nanaimo, Canada




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (23)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpokeat 03:47 on September 7th, 2009
Thanks for this Amijha
at 03:58 on September 7th, 2009
Welcome Karl; hope West will learn to assimilate, specially France, where they pass this kind of moral code of conduct in the name of superficial equality.
at 06:09 on September 7th, 2009
You should know my friend Assimilation in most Western Countries including France are starting to abide by the adage when in Rome, you are Roman, regardless where you previously came from... if the majority of the people of the country lived in want change, then that is what makes the West democratic. It may not be fair to those who disagree, but that is the rule, majority rule, just as a westerner living in the middle east should not impose their mode of dress on the country they are living, such as Afghanistan, Pakistan or Kurdistan.
at 04:19 on September 7th, 2009
So women are free but they can be told not to wear what they want ? Huh ? ?
at 04:57 on September 7th, 2009
Women were not to be told what to wear either. (Well maybe by a fashion designer, but not definitely by a religious head(less) or a fanatic )
.Agent.
at 05:44 on September 7th, 2009
So thats how muslim women see things is it ? No, they believe God tells them to dress that way. Do you believe you have the right to tell them what to think ? Is that not repression ?
at 06:03 on September 7th, 2009
To each their own. good story.
As I always say when in Rome.......
at 06:14 on September 7th, 2009
What Barry, tell people what to wear in the name of freedom ? Grow up
at 07:44 on September 7th, 2009
We've just seen a Muslim court convict a UN worker in Africa on morality charges for wearing trousers. The normal punishment is flogging. So are you saying that if you are willing to be flogged, you can wear trousers?
at 07:58 on September 7th, 2009
I think women must be willing to get flogged or just wear burkka in order not to "trigger" the sex-starved men in that great country - after all it is "God's order", no?
Excellent offer, Roy :D..!
.Agent.
at 08:14 on September 7th, 2009
So you think you have the right to tell women what clothes they are allowed to wear ! You sexist oppressor of women Roy C ! So women in Bhurkas (Bhurkas dont cover the face, remember) can not enter banks ? How about people wearing puffy jackets ? No one is allowed to enter a bank in Canada in the winter time ! What does the C stand for Roy ?
at 08:27 on September 7th, 2009
opinion: we cannot tell muslim women what to wear. It's a habit. Nothing elese, and i think we haven't got the right to creat laws, like it's usual in the US. Religion is religion. It's not important which kind of church. There are rules, if I want I will care about them or not. It's simple. Without any terrorists or idiot church leader. We have the right to choose what we want, here in Europe. And we do not need to follow the US in such a case. Europe will be Europe. We need to take care our issues. And I think in a liberal/democratic EU we must let anybdy to believe in what he/she wants. (and want to wear)
at 09:08 on September 7th, 2009
As a Westerner, I am reluctant to project my views onto another culture. Although, I have stated before in other articles that I support Muslim women who want to be free to have a choice about clothing.
Lubna Ahmed al Hussein of Sudan was convicted of indecency for wearing pants flaunting Article 152 law of the Sundan. She was spared 40 lashes because of the international attention her case received. However, ten other women who were with her and also wearing pants plead guilty and received ten lashes.
Lubna wants to repeal Article 152 of the Sudenese Penal Code stating that the article is against their constitution and Islamic law; further, she states there is nothing in the Quran about flogging women over what they wear.
at 09:32 on September 7th, 2009
"Muslim women who want to be free to have a choice about clothing. "
Absolutely. But the issue here is that they are not free to decide on anything let alone choosing their own cloth. All they are supposed to do, according to their "protectors" and "religious leaders" who claim to be the loudspeakers of god, is to cover themselves up properly without "arousing the sin" in the men,keep their body and soul "pure" and become one of the dozen wives of the most wealthy tribal leader. When that does not happens things start getting bad with "corrective actions" like flogging to public stoning to death.
Oh, those who throw stones at the women who performed this act of 'sin' get their quota of real-estate (12 acres it seems) in the seventh heaven, as usual.
.Agent.
at 11:12 on September 7th, 2009
Living in such a diverse city as Toronto, I'm used to seeing women wearing the Hijab, even the Burqa doesn't get a second glance around here. I don't see a problem with it if they are wearing it of their own free will.
I worry though about younger kids, teenage girls mostly, who are at a stage where they're trying to fit in with their friends here in the West, and are being pulled in both directions - the traditional dress of their parents, and the styles of their peers. The kids of the first generation immigrants have it the hardest, the second a little easier, as they adapt to Western ways.
It is not unheard of for them to lose the Hijab when they get to school, same as our kids might don extra makeup, roll up their skirt, or change into a belly top after leaving the house.
This creates problems within the household, and it's not unheard of for the parents to punish or even kill their child for such. It happens, and that's where I see a problem. The whole fitting it thing ...
at 14:27 on September 7th, 2009
Blue Crush
Thank you for this perspective. I agree the inter-generational push/pull in the adaptation of the children of immigrants presents a mirad of problems for the parents and the children. Jumpha Lahiri writes in her books Interpreter of Maladies which won a Pulizer Prize, The Namesake, and Unaccustomed Earth about the Indian Bengali immigrant experiences in the America. The conflicts that arise out of loyalty to their homeland in India and their relatives still living there as well as finding a compromise and balance between preserving their cultural heritage and becoming American while raising children who are more American than Bengali.
I would recommend her books to anyone interested in this topic.
at 19:17 on September 7th, 2009
A small statistics on honor killing.
Source: canadafreepress.com
.Agent.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
asush (not verified)at 11:52 on September 7th, 2009
I feel the Muslim women can wear their Hijab in obedience to their god( actually Muhammed deviced this to protect his beautiful wives e.g Zainab, and the rest of his harem) but in public or in banks due to security reasons and demands of a highly industrialized Western should put it off . Wetern women cant wear mini skirt in Mecca for "religious reasons". So the Muslim women too must learn to adapt to our society(for security or industrial reasons). Thats the diffbtw Islam and other world religions. Others religions more easily adapt to a changing world butr Islam promotes astrong, traditionalist Arab supremacy mentality
at 22:00 on September 7th, 2009
Thank all of you, for Healthy discussion. Well i am sorry to say all of us are slave of our thinking process, and our thinking is guided by the past(conditioning). Unfortunately none of us are free in real sense, whether east or west, clothing is just one reflection of that.
at 22:17 on September 7th, 2009
No your complete on wrong way (Roy C), our holy religion ISLAM does not permit women and men in the dress your are demanding for,. 1st you will have to become muslim and wearing the muslims dress then you are permitted to come to our holy places makkah and Al-Madinah in Saudi Arabia.
at 22:19 on September 7th, 2009
No you complete on wrong way, our holy religion ISLAM does not permit women and men in the dress your are demanding for,. 1st you will have to become muslim and wearing the muslims dress then you are permitted to come to our holy places makkah and Al-Madinah in Saudi Arabia.
at 22:34 on September 7th, 2009
"1st you will have to become muslim"
Excellent idea. A small price every tourist must pay..Wonderful..! Why no other nation thought about this before?
.Agent.
at 23:06 on September 7th, 2009
The hijab has become a political symbol - and it has nothing, nothing at all to do with the Muslim religion.
If I may be so bold, it is now more about a pissing contest rather than a debating subject.
What will be the biggest downfall of the Muslim religion is Wahhabism, in the west, Europe and England in particular, that fight was fought almost 600 years ago.
And, if you don't think that women played a major role in that insurrection - you need to read history - again, and again, and again.
Mohammed preached peace and understanding - others who believe otherwise preach intolerance - that is, in the religious term, against the very prophet that you say you follow.
Jihad was a defence (and that was a matter that all who were within the city wall, Muslim, Christian and Jew) all fought together to preserve the city for all who lived there.
Religion has taken on a political stance - it did that for a millennia - it failed then and will fail now, religion and politics do not mix - ever.