NP Rank:
Insider's Perspective on "Don't Ask Don't Tell"
The following letter in its entirety was written by an United States Military Chaplain. Addressed to President Barack Obama, it outlines a contradiction of the notion that DADT is supported uniformily by Military service personnel.
What struck me first was the absolute eloquence of the letter. Writing especially letter writing is in a way, a lost art. The chaplain’s ability herein makes his argument all the more touching and compelling.
The other object of note per se, is the use of religion and notably Christianity to affirm the need for equality and change. That has always—in my mind at least—been the most perplexing aspect of the majority of established Christian denominations; that is—that they (at the very least on a grass-roots level, if not further) seem to perpetuate doctrine which lacks the message of acceptance and love found in their scriptures. My understanding of Christianity is that it is first and foremost, an Egalitarian religion. Yet, due to the social and political constituencies who declare themselves Christians I would be loathe to say that is indeed the case.
Anyway, I found this letter via a news article and decided it was worth posting separately. Read the letter to its culmination, I implore you. I would love to hear your thoughts or rebuttals ont the matter:
Dear Mr. President,
As an active-duty military chaplain who just returned from a 15-month deployment in Iraq, this is my appeal for justice:
Over the years some of us have buried our closest friends — officers and enlisted, African American, Latinos, Native Americans, Asians, Whites, rich, poor, Protestants, Catholics, Muslims and Jews. They had the courage to make the supreme sacrifice in order for us to reap the bounties of freedom. We owe them a debt of gratitude which can never be repaid.
What is remarkable about these Marines, Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Coastguardsmen is they understood the personal risk when they answered the highest calling of our nation. What could be a nobler act then to give one’s life to one’s country, knowing that in their lives many freedoms would be denied them?
And when their story is told a significant piece of their life would be missing.
As they sleep under the crosses, the stars of David and the crescents there is no bigotry. There is no prejudice. There is no hatred. And within the sacred confines of their resting place there is no law of “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.” There is only purest democracy.
When the final cross has been placed in the last cemetery, will it only be then that we as a nation acknowledge our gay brothers and sisters who took the risks of life and truth to answer their nation’s highest calling? How many of these brave men and women lie in military graves and still hide in death?
They are among the unknown soldiers.
There are only a few who know the truth of those who lie in these graves. There are only a few who know the suffering and sorrow of those who mourn them in silence and fear. The nation remains silent and owes no allegiance to who they truly were nor does it honor their loved ones. What does that say of our sacred values?
If one gay person was killed in defense of America, issues such as the destruction of unit morale or the fear of people not wanting to join the military devalue their sacrifice. This is not about appeasing the uncomfortable feelings of a minority; this is a universal and transcendent matter of justice. America was built on the common Jewish and Christian heritage of justice when the Bible commands: “Justice, justice you shall pursue” (Deuteronomy 16:20).
It is easy for those who do not live in fear of being ‘outed’ to say: ‘We must wait and examine this law further.’ But when you have to watch what you say, where you go, and who you talk to, this erodes the human person. When you live in fear that the wrong pronoun slips through your lips, or a co-worker see you in public with your life long partner and you respond ‘this is just a friend’, this degrades your human self worth.
Gays and lesbians wait not for justice, for them justice is denied, but they wait for the ‘knock on the door.’ They are haunted daily waiting ‘to be found out.’
We went to foreign lands to wage war to liberate people so they would not have to live in the fear of waiting. But citizens of our own land who served nobly, who died to secure freedoms which they would never profit from, must live in fear waiting for justice.
“Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” is an unjust law. It degrades the human soul because it forces those who willingly serve to live in shameful humiliation because of deceit and fear. It undermines the very principles and values of what it means to be an American. Living the façade of a life goes against the Core Values of every Armed Service. How much longer is justice going to be denied? There comes a time when despair and fear must end.
Mr. President, we depend on your sense of justice and fairness to help end this gross injustice so we, as a nation, do not have to wait for the final marker to be placed in the last cemetery.
We ask you to lead the way in repealing this unjust law and replace it with a policy of non-discrimination that advances open and honest service. A law that is consistent with true American values and honors the sacrifices of so many who have served – and died — in silence.
With deepest respect,
A military chaplain
http://www.365gay.com/news/from-the-frontlines-how-many-gay-soldiers-still-hide-in-death/
Crowd Power
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States
Recommendations (4)
-
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke
Redwater, Alberta, Canada -
YankeeJim
Arlington, Virginia, United States



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (9)
at 15:01 on April 30th, 2010
Thanks for continuing to explore the meaning of a military chaplain's letter from the frontlines, Grace. As I noted to you here, I hope others will read it too, as well as the stories at SLDN.
Thanks again!
at 19:18 on April 30th, 2010
Indeed. It was yours that spurred me to add this one. Thanks! And i do also hope so!
at 03:07 on May 1st, 2010
You are very welcome!:)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
David Harris (not verified)at 15:38 on April 30th, 2010
It is clear that this military chaplain does not see much value in the ethical tradition of utilitarianism. This is the ethical tradition that follows the line of thought that what is right is what provides for the greatest benefit for greatest number of people. If this military chaplain talked with military and civilian personnel in all of the armed forces, he would see the same trend that exists in the numerous polls that have been taken among military personnel, Gallup, Rasmussen, Pew Research, etc. which show most support DADT. There was never a notion that DADT was supported uniformly in the armed forces, which consists of millions of people, but certainly it is supported by the majority, by a long shot. This coincides with polls taken among American citizens on their support or lack thereof for DADT. Unfortunately for homosexuals, Americans are not in support of recognizing their relationships and view them as a detriment, not a benefit. As of November 2009, when legislation legalizing same-sex marriage in Maine was defeated by referendum, same-sex marriage had been defeated in all 31 states in which it had been directly put to a popular vote. Thirty states have passed constitutional amendments prohibiting same-sex marriage. As for Christian denominations that lack the message of "acceptance" and "love" because they do not wish to consider homosexual relationships as "normal" or "acceptable", perhaps they would also lack the message if they did not let a sex offender, who has served his time and paid his debt to society, teach at the local private Catholic school. Certainly if they are a religion of love and acceptance they would let this person teach their children would they not? Because they do not, they must not be a Egalitarian religion. It is unfortunate I can make the opinions you present look a bit foolish in 5 minutes. The armed forces, Christianity, and the American people have to draw a line somewhere. Using the argument presented by the chaplain, I can show support for Transvestites who wish to serve in the military without a DADT policy. The argument is flawed.
at 19:41 on April 30th, 2010
You present a flawed argument. Your example is of a crime considered malum in se as opposed to homosexual service in the military which is merely malum prohibitum. Therefore, no valid correlation or comparison may be made.
You have in no way made me look foolish. Your flawed logic stems from arrogance and idiocy.
Furthermore, Utilitarianism was prevalent in this country in the early to mid-twentieth century. It was not developed earlier and had no legitimate sway. Since then, it has not been the sole modus di operandi.
Also, for someone who has critized my grammar and spelling (or at least that of my article and its respective comments) your's is atrocious.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpokeat 16:40 on April 30th, 2010
Don't Ask, Don't Tell is a no brainer. If you're good enough to die for your country in the closet you should be good enough to die out of the closet as well.
I have always considered DADT a lousy compromise of a politician without conviction. Canada has permitted gays to serve in their military since the mid 90s and the sun still rises and sets each day.
The fact that your lawmakers have defeated same sex marriage in 31 states and introduced anti-gay marriage legislation in 30 states shows a lack of backbone by legislators.
In Canada it was also referred to the Supreme Court before Legislators took it up in Parliament. That was a lack of backbone as well. Nevertheless same sex marriage is legal in Canada.
Just for the record, I am straight and ex-military (35 years).
The dynosaurs need to get off the couch, shake the homophobia off them and really consider what benefit they gain by denying a basic human right.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Donovan Campbell (not verified)at 05:55 on May 6th, 2010
Karl, I applaud your service and thank you for the sacrifices you have made. I too am a soldier and a veteran. Currently, I am also a chaplain candidate. The issue of permitting open homosexuality in the military is a tricky one - especially for those of us in the Chaplaincy who hold to orthodox and evangelical doctrine. Yet, I do agree with your disdain of the standing "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. I must however disagree with one argument you make. The choice of methods or partners in sexuality is NOT a right. My premise for this is simple and straightforward. Rapists, pedophiles, bigamists, even necropheliacs would love to claim that their prefered methods or partners are a right owed them. However, we - as people, governments, nations and lawmakers - recognize the errancy in this thought. It is one thing to argue that homosexuality is or is not moral, legal or acceptable. The issue of allowing open homosexuality in the military is a worthy discussion. But, it is something entirely different to label sexuality as a "right". All forms of sexual intercourse are regulated by law and by society to some degree. The married, heterosexual couple is not permitted to copulate in the middle of the street, without legal repercusion, because sexual intercourse is not a "right".
at 08:04 on May 6th, 2010
Thats an invalid correlation though. You cannot compare a person engaging in a monogomous or series ormonogomous relationhips where the desire therein is reciprocated to violent crimes such as rape. Only one party desires relations therein, and instead of amorous, they are strictly sexual.
Sexuality is a right endowed by the premise of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Expounding this to dangerous illicit drugs etc is not valid because in logical succession to much of a stretch must be made. Sex in the middleof the street is vulgar and inconsiderate of children so naturally it is not allowed. But what you do in the privacy of your own home is for the most part, your own business.
Personally if you wish to die for your country my hat's off to you, and I applaud you therein. I certainly could not due to pacifist tendenies and the fact that I refuse to support Imperialism. But if a person is willing and able why stop them?
at 08:12 on May 6th, 2010
Also, I had a question that is slightly irrelevant. You said that this would be an issue for evangelical and fundamentalist et all chaplains.
The central tenet of Christian faith is summated as "love God and love man." Given that, the early Christians lived in a near-Marxist commune. Yet, now those who deem themselves fundamentailst have some of the most extreme views. As a general rule (as always there are variences and deviations) this includes anti-homosexuality, anti-abortion, no women in leadership, and for the Republican demographic, anti-social welfare and similar things.
My question is how is that fundamental or orthodox given the example expounded of early fundamentalists? How are the views so biggoted and even so extreme as to ex. call for the death of homosexual persons, politicians, those who engage in abotion or provide it, etc. Is there not something worng there?
My question and Ill admit my biggest issue with religion is that why do others allow these people who seem the antithesis of Christ to claim they are Christian and their act approved etc by God? Why as a wholedoes the faith not seem to disavow these not so small minorities?