International Criminal Court: Breakthrough on Crime of Aggression

by Larry Kazdan | July 13, 2010 at 05:04 pm
717 views | 0 Recommendations | 3 comments

Photos

Symbol United Nations-Photo-01

Symbol United Nations-Photo-01

see larger image

uploaded by Rhonda J Mangus

In a historic development, states parties to the treaty for an International Criminal Court (ICC) recently incorporated the crime of aggression in the mandate of the Court.

Review Conference 2010

At an ICC treaty review conference May 31 to June 11, 2010 in Uganda, the 111 states parties to the Rome Statute of the ICC agreed on the definition of the crime of aggression and made decisions about how the ICC would exercise its jurisdiction.

"Up to now, the International Criminal Court has focused on the most egregious crimes of international concern, prosecuting individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide.  But now the spotlight is shifting,” says Warren Allmand, former President of the International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development, and current President of the World Federalist Movement - Canada. “The capacity to prosecute aggression strengthens the ICC as an important instrument for international peace and security.”

Rule of Law Advanced

Historically, the determination of the existence of aggression has been the sole responsibility of the United Nations  Security Council, which is empowered under the UN Charter to “maintain international peace and security.” However, the Council has frequently failed to take action in the face of aggression. The fact that its five permanent members (U.S., U.K., France, China, Russia – also the world’s five largest arms exporters) can veto Security Council decisions means that agreement on effective action to maintain peace and security has often proved elusive.

“Now, aggression is no longer a ‘political  crime,’” says Allmand. “This is a tremendous advance for the rule of law.”

The crime of aggression will not be prosecutable before 2017, and will also require thirty country ratifications as well as an additional vote by the states parties to the treaty to bring the amendment into effect.  However, the agreement on a comprehensive definition of aggression, something which has eluded the UN for over 60 years, will allow national courts to incorporate this crime properly into national laws, and will serve as a benchmark for all to judge the action of potential transgressors.  It will also provide added incentive for more states to join the ICC treaty.

Canada's Leadership 

"Canada should be among the first to ratify this amendment and we can use our good offices to rally consensus toward implementation," says Allmand.  "Canadians should be very proud of our significant contributions over the years to the creation and development of the International Criminal Court."

Anniversary Event -  Review Conference Q & A

World Day for International Justice is celebrated each year on July 17, the anniversary of the adoption in 1998 of the Rome Statute which is the founding treaty of the International Criminal Court.  On Friday16 July 2010 from 4 to 5 p.m. CET (10-11 a.m. EST), the Coalition for the International Criminal Court (CICC), a civil society network of 2,500 organizations in 150 countries, will host a live question and answer session with CICC Convenor, William R. Pace. See the Coalition’s blog at http://www.coalitionfortheicc.org/blog for details.  Mr. Pace will answer questions on the Rome Statute system, and reflect on key outcomes of the recent ICC Review Conference.



Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
t k kidwai

International Criminal Court is a tiger without teeth.If US is member of ICC,it would be sabotaged from within like UN Security Council,UNO and other international institutions;if not,biggest war criminal in the entire history of mankind can not be brought to justice. How the International Court of Justice was ridiculed by American officials when it delivered judgement in favour of Nacargua .UNO is there,ICJ is there,ICC is there,but none has the power-power which is vested in US and four sub-ordiantes of US imperialists.

We need not be jubilant over breakthrough on Crime of Aggression.

0
Larry Kazdan

The ICC was created despite the opposition of the most powerful countries, including the United States, and only became operational in 2002.  Yet it has now been ratified by 111 countries and as a consequence has developed a momentum which cannot be stopped.  Already the Court is producing a deterrent effect on leaders who up till now have been able to enact horrific crimes with impunity.  As a small example, they will have to worry about traveling to foreign countries where they could be arrested.  While the Court will never be a perfect institution that solves all problems of justice and equity, we need to take a longer view of history and celebrate those significant steps that advance the force of law over the law of force.


"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
                                    - Voltaire

0
t k kidwai

Law of the force has always prevailed over force of law.That is the tragedy.Despite so many international institutions war crimes and crimes against humanity have been rising.The significance of an institution lies in its effectiveness,not by number of the members who are signatories to its charter.

The imperfect can never be friend of the good.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from