Iran Unveils First Unmanned Bomber Plane Which Could Reach Israel

by UNCENSORED NEWS | August 22, 2010 at 05:49 am

942 views | 4 Recommendations | 10 comments

As today moves quickly inside Bushehr's nuclear power plant, an unveiling of magnitude surfaces in the press which disturbs many people. During Iran's inauguration ceremony for the new "Ambassador of Death," President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announced new information during a formal ceremony of Iran's new bomber plane, he said "it's ready to reach countries up to 620 miles away (and probably at least 3000 miles plus with the enhanced uranium enrichment)."

The "Ambassador of Death" is an unmanned vehicle (which means it is a robot with auto pilot) which carries up to 4 ballastic missiles (atomic weapons). Iran has denied owning these weapons to the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) which monitors the atomic progress of all nations.

Iran's President told the press, ""The scope of Iran's reaction will include the entire earth," said Ahmadinejad. "We also tell you - the West - that all options are on the table."

Ahmadinejad seemed to be reiterating terminology used by the U.S. and Israel in his statements and did not rule out the possibility of Iran using its nuclear facilities against all mankind.

"The jet, as well as being an ambassador of death for the enemies of humanity, has a main message of peace and friendship," said Ahmadinejad at the inauguration ceremony, which fell on the country's national day for its defense industries.

Some followers of the Middle Eastern Islam religion have been socialized to associate war, and the destruction of their enemies as a religious act which helps to purify the soul and enhances their ability to gain entrance into heaven. They also believe that if they commit suicide they will automatically be taken to heaven to see God.

Yesterday, Iran released a youtube video showing a test-fire of the liquid fueled surface-to-surface war missile, the Qiam-1, containing advanced guidance systems.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Sunday inaugurated the country's first domestically built unmanned bomber aircraft, calling it an "ambassador of death" to Iran's enemies. The 4-meter-long drone aircraft can carry up to four cruise missiles and will have a range of 620 miles (1,000 kilometers), according to a state TV report - not far enough to reach archenemy Israel."The jet, as well as being an ambassador of death for the enemies of humanity, has a main message of peace and friendship," said Ahmadinejad at the inauguration ceremony, which fell on the country's national day for its defense industries.

4 See all footage | View Slideshow

Share: email story | add to any | | facebook | stumbleupon

recommend Sign In or Join to post comments

YankeeJim

at 06:58 on August 22nd, 2010

One little slip by Iran and the place will evaporate.

batvette

at 07:34 on August 22nd, 2010

Is your username "uncensored news" or "unfounded news"?

there are enougjh silly discrepencies here I have to call this complete bull.

#1 an unmanned aircraft just 4 meters long- about 13 feet- carrying 4 missiles of ANY type seems rather unlikely.

#2 your referenced quote states cruise missiles, yet your text states ballistic. Ballistic missiles, by name and description of operation- are not launched by airborne aircraft. A cruise missile may. Ballistic, think "what comes up, comes down"... and in a near perfect arc.

#3 You claim a 13 ft long unmanned aircraft would carry 4 of any kind of missile armed with a nuclear warhead? Bull****. The smallest nuclear devices ever built by the US might fit on 4 guided rockets on such a craft with a very, very limited range- like 20 miles. Said devices are 100 years out of the technological capabilities of the Iranians, and are unstable and unreliable even in the hands of our techs.

#4 any reason why the video depicts an unrelated craft?

I initially intended to post this when I saw the headline:

"well it's a good thing this is unmanned, it will go perfectly with the proposed scenario as when we are done with these guys the day they want nuclear warfare, not one Iranian will be left on that parking lot".

And I have no beef with the good people of Iran, whether they live there or left 30 years ago. It's the bad ones I don't give a **** about. those who call us the great satan and blame us for their screwed up internal politics and problems, or believe Kermit Roosevelt bought off their leaders by paying $10,000 for circus jugglers, acrobats and strongmen to overthrow their government in 1953. Bull****. Nobody is that weak and gullible.

(this deserves its own topic, but what went down in '53 was the US and Britain wanted to initiate something that was far out of the reaches of the resources they had available to them- but was well on the way to happening on its own, due to Mossadegh's disasterous policies. Years after the fact after JFK's death and Bay of Pigs, the CIA was near being dissolved by Congress for its ineptitude and evil activities, but as Iran was seen as the shining star of US foreign policy, publicly took credit for something that was impossible for them to have done, and forged documents to convince Congress to relent and continue their operations. In 1979 that blows up in their face as Iran falls. The NY Times runs an expose later that declares the CIA responsible, which since Iran is now a huge blunder, self loathing American leftists run with like the Holy Bible and refuse to impeach.

It's complete bull****, folks, the CIA had good reason to embellish their role and it insults the people of Iran as dumb, weak and gullible and ready to sell out their own country for chump change. I know a few Iranians and they are none of that. Leftists who claim they are concerned about Iranians and that's why they blame America are full of it. If they cared they would understand offereing a way to deny personal accountability for your own problems is the worst thing you can do to a troubled man. Man up, Iran. You're much better than that. )

anymoose (not verified)

at 14:11 on August 22nd, 2010

batvette, i enjoyed the final chapter. good for you. one noticeable omission perhaps, the iranians don't run the country or determine the political agenda. they don't elect the cleric hierarchy only hand puppets like Ahmadinejad. and the words he shouts at the west are not his own. latest example: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad rejected fears of an attack on Iran, tauntingIsrael as "too weak to face up to Iran militarily," and the US as unable to beat even a small army in Iraq, speaking in an interview with Al-Jazeera. this kind of rhetoric must be for the middle east because, as usual he sounds like a joke in the west.

batvette

at 15:04 on August 22nd, 2010

batvette, i enjoyed the final chapter. good for you.

I think we speak the same language, you would be possibly surprised to find there are factual accounts to drive that:

http://www.aryamehr.org/eng/19august/28mordad.htm

Just understand the extreme motivations of the CIA to assume credit for the affair after JFK's assasination.

the iranians don't run the country or determine the political agenda. they don't elect the cleric hierarchy only hand puppets like Ahmadinejad.

Wait, aren't we talking about Iran? You just described America, who trail the Iranians at least in credibility, they aren't running around the world telling everyone their crooked bull**** is "freedom" and "democracy".

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Foreign_Policy_Institutions/Council_Foreign_Relations.html

this kind of rhetoric must be for the middle east because, as usual he sounds like a joke in the west.

Fair enough, hadn't thought of that one. Thanks for the input. I actually like the Iranian President, for what reason I have never figured out. He LOOKS personable. We can't fault him for talking tough to instill the self respect in his people, if this is what he's doing. After the embassy incident it's just a bit dangerous to do so, people don't understand how seriously many Americans took that. Even if somewhat deserved by meddling on our part, in the 20th century embassies- the "diplomatic mission" are really what keeps nations from tearing each other apart, an embassy is a sacred part of one country in another. There are some who find normalized relations may be impossible in our lifetimes. In 1979 after watching the Ayatollah on TV I left high school a year early and signed up in the navy, did four years and was initially disappointed we didn't bomb Iran. Since I have obviously matured to be glad we did not. Still we have many tensions.

Sad as the Iranians, or rather Persians, I have met are good people.

anymoose (not verified)

at 16:04 on August 22nd, 2010

huge difference between living in iran and living in the u.s.. you have some personal effect on the agenda through free speech and your vote. now i admit it is not direct control but, when combined with the teeming mass, it can be effective. also if you want, you have opportunities to become personally involved in your government at local, state or federal level and contribute there. i read shoup's article. nothing new there. in the 1800's representatives of electoral candidates would go from pub to pub offering $2 to every man who would vote for their candidate. it has been reported in the old papers that that was the busiest pub day of the year and that most took the $2 from both parties and that the election results were so badly skewed determining the true winner impossible. also related to his article. the upper class has always managed government and i might add with the general approval of the 'lower class'. most people don't want the guy they work beside running the country even if in their heart of hearts they don't think he could do a worse job. they just don't think he could do a better job or have the connections. and that's the difference. shoup's adversaries and bogeymen of the upper classes- are different than the rest of us. they have different upbringings, school experiences, and life experiences in general. i think it is safe to recognize that and not feel "less" for not sharing the experience. none of those people drink in my bars or belong to my clubs or have my education or my experiences, and quite frankly i am very comfortable with the differences. i don't envy the rich nor the powerful. i'm glad they are there doing the job i don't want.

batvette

at 00:25 on August 23rd, 2010

you seem like a pretty fart smeller. one fallacy/exception:

GW Bush. Not obviously "upper crust".

Good thing he wasn't really the "decider" of anything more important than what tie he wore every day.

guys like Bush, well he didn't decide on March 17 2003 "let's invade iraq in 48 hours". He has guys like Bob, and Dave, etc. who are experts, tell him it's time to invade. He's say "Bob, what do we do about Iraq?" "I think we need to invade, Mr. Bush" "well Bob you're my Iraq guy so whatever you think we should do, well we'll do that."

And Bob makes the calls on Iraq until Bush loses confidence in Bob's judgement.

anymoose (not verified)

at 01:11 on August 23rd, 2010

i doubt he got to choose his tie or was as stupid as he was made out to be. that good ol'boy shuck and jive works like camo. i've got a buddy who behaves the same way. he's a top level aircraft engineer and when people meet him they always wonder when their going to meet the engineer. i can't stop smiling. it's something to see the faces as they realize this hick is the engineer people they trusted recommended. >>> and obama has the exact same group, or a mirror image, of people telling him when to jump. that is why there has been no real obama policy. it's still bush policy until it runs it's course and the financial picture reverses, and iraq and afghanistan is done with. if obama is reelected there just might be an obama policy that has to be finished by the next guy. how's that gitmo thing going. obama was going to close that day one and 'return america to the moral high ground' lol.

UNCENSORED NEWS

at 06:37 on August 24th, 2010

sweetie you dont know what your talking about... At all... I mean basketball players are 6 ft less than this Bomber you think is 13 feet long. You are not dealing with a full deck. The fuel alone would have to take up a space close to 13 feet

batvette

at 20:15 on September 9th, 2010

Ummm, "dear", I got that 13 feet figure from your article:

The 4-meter-long drone aircraft can carry up to four cruise missiles and will have a range of 620 miles (1,000 kilometers), according to a state TV report

4 meters at last check was, oh, roughly, 13.12335958 feet.

Giver or take a whisker. So unless you want to correct your reference I would stand on my analysis- however it appears we are on the same page regarding a 13 foot long aircraft carrying nuclear weapons being completely absurd.

Now I will go back to dusting the house with my leaf blower. Once everything is duct taped down it's a cinch.