Iraq -- Political impasse: political equilibrium

by YankeeJim | August 1, 2010 at 04:33 am
122 views | 2 Recommendations | 3 comments

Photos

Leaders are not these men | Photo 02

Leaders are not these men | Photo 02

see larger image

uploaded by YankeeJim

Maybe the solution some people are seeking is right before their eyes. If you can’t see it, maybe it is because you are not in the final equation, or your part is considerably different than you expected.

That might be the general situation in Iraq.

“Political leaders agree in principle that the new government should be inclusive. But the two leading blocs have quarreled over whether the constitution gives the top vote-getter the right to form the incoming government, or whether a larger coalition assembled after the vote could earn that right.”

They are debating the means to a common end. Since the margin of the top vote getter is so small, it seems like a coalition vote would be most fair.  Yet, in the USA, the winner by the smallest margin would get the right to call the shots probably. What do the British do? The process might be more toward a collaboration, right.

At any rate, they don’t want a heavy handed Maliki. The minority want a more secular outcome they can trust without the potential strong influence from Iran. 

So, the USA backs the Arabs and Iranians back Maliki. Is that it? Or, do the Americans just want enough stability to get the heck out of there before the civil war breaks out?

“Iraqis don't expect political impasse to be resolved by fall

By Ernesto Londoño

Sunday, August 1, 2010

BAGHDAD -- Nearly five months after disputed parliamentary elections, leading Iraqi politicians say they have all but abandoned hope of resolving an impasse over forming a new government before fall.

The protracted stalemate is a scenario U.S. officials have long dreaded. By the end of August, the United States will declare the end of its combat mission in Iraq -- and reduce troop strength to 50,000 -- amid a deepening political crisis.

In the coming weeks, Washington will install a new ambassador and a new top general in Baghdad. American officials had hoped the next Iraqi administration would have been in place well before their change of guard to help ensure a smooth transition at a delicate time. U.S. officials have long feared that Iraq's first transfer of power as a sovereign nation could be marred by unrest and violence.

Former Prime Minister Ayad Allawi, one of the contenders for his former post, said in an interview Saturday that months of negotiations among blocs have not led to a resolution on who is entitled to the country's premiership or how other powerful jobs will be allocated. He said a breakthrough is unlikely before September or October because little official business is conducted during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan, which begins in mid-August.

The looming withdrawal of U.S. troops and rising anger among Iraqis over continuing attacks, joblessness and deteriorating government services have made power-sharing negotiations increasingly contentious. "The process so far is inadequate, it is not balanced and it is rigged with problems," Allawi said. "A weakened process could easily collapse at the end of the day."

Scores of Iraqis were killed in July in near-daily attacks across the country.

The top U.S. commander in Iraq, Gen. Ray Odierno, has insisted that political troubles and continuing violence will not keep American troops from leaving the country on schedule, although he said he would be concerned if the issue is not resolved by October.

Allawi's Sunni-backed coalition, Iraqiya, won 91 seats in the new parliament. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's bloc came in a close second, winning 89. Appointing a new prime minister requires at least 163 votes.

Political leaders agree in principle that the new government should be inclusive. But the two leading blocs have quarreled over whether the constitution gives the top vote-getter the right to form the incoming government, or whether a larger coalition assembled after the vote could earn that right.

Smaller political factions that could break the deadlock remain undecided. Neighboring countries, meanwhile, have weighed in forcefully. Iran backs the creation of a government led by religious Shiites, while Syria, Turkey and Saudi Arabia are reportedly supporting Allawi, a secular Shiite whose coalition received strong support from Sunni voters.

This summer, Iraqis took to the streets to protest the government's inability to deliver more than a few hours of electricity per day. Iraqis increasingly speak disparagingly about their leaders, and imams around the country have spoken out against poor governance at Friday prayers.

"Now, everything is stopped," said Nadjha Khadum, the editor of the Ur News agency Web site. "There's no work, no jobs. People are waiting. People are just buying food and saving money because they are afraid the situation will get worse in the future -- worse than in 2006 and 2007," years marked by a brutal insurgency.”

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
1
t k kidwai

Any political formation in Iraq will always lack stability as long as US soldiers are on Iraqi soil and Iraqis lack sense of security and sovereignty-both are under constant threat by US imperialists.Arabs,especially Saudi Arabia,the most trusted lackey of US imperialist,an untiring preacher of wahabism,responsible for fomenting secterainism and dividing schism between two major sects of Islam,are always a divided house.What unites them is unquestioned loyalty to US empire.

A government which is installed through means of wars shouldn't be expected to deliver to the local population.What suits the masters,slaves always do that.Were it not so,slavery would have lost meanings to both the masters and slaves.Even if slaves are entrusted governance,they serve the interests of the masters,not the masses.If Iraqis don't want to learn,who can teach them.

0
YankeeJim

"A government which is installed through means of wars shouldn't be expected to deliver to the local population."

All governments are installed through means of war, are they not?

0
t k kidwai

YJ.Not all governments.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

t k kidwai
First Flagged at 5:06 AM, Aug 1, 2010 by t k kidwai
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (2)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from