Israel cease fire ends in Gaza; hours after it began

by Jordan Yerman | January 17, 2009 at 01:03 pm
741 views | 64 Recommendations | 37 comments

The cease fire has already ended in the Gaza Strip.

Fighting resumed Sunday morning in Gaza as Hamas terrorists broke the unilateral ceasefire just hours after Israel announced it would implement the truce in the region.

The IDF confirmed that terrorists fired on Israeli soldiers stationed in Gaza. IDF troops responded with tank and helicopter fire. The terrorists also launched a Kassam rocket attack on the Gaza Belt community of Sderot, located less than a kilometer away from the security barrier. A barrage of six of the short-range rockets exploded in the city at about 9:00 a.m., but all of the missiles landed in open areas. No one was physically injured and no damage was reported.

Previously:

The cease fire has begun in the Gaza Strip. Whether it has been breached already is still not known.

The security cabinet of Israel has reportedly approved a cease-fire in the Gaza Strip, at least from the Israeli side of the border with Gaza. According to the Jerusalem Post, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert announced the cease-fire proposal on Saturday, while adding that the goals of Israel’’s offensive in Gaza had been achieved.

Apparently Israel has already breached their cease fire:

Israel apparently breached its cease-fire after about 45 minutes when live television pictures showed a flare come down in Gaza City.
The Unilateral ceasefire declared by Ehud Barak, the Israeli Defense Minister, went into effect at 2 am on Sunday, while the Israeli troops invading Gaza will not withdraw and will remain in the Gaza Strip for a possible resumption and expansion of the war.

NowPublic is looking for more information.

After 22 days of violence, Israel has announced a unilateral cease-fire in Gaza.

 No direct talks have been held between Israel and Hamas, so it's hard to tell what effect a cease-fire announcement will have: Israel can temporarily suspend attacks on Gaza upon stated conditions (whatever those might be), but Hamas can just as easily say "no", in which case the attacks could easily continue.


More NowPublic coverage can be found on our Gaza Feature Channel.

Hamas has said it won't respect the ceasefire as long as Israel remains inside Gaza.

More than 1,100 Palestinians, half of them civilians, have died in the Israeli operation. Thirteen Israelis have also died.

The sources said the ceasefire deal did not involve Hamas.

In an initial reaction, a Hamas spokesman said the group would fight until its demands were met.

In the hours leading up to the meeting and after it started, Israel kept bombarding Gaza. In the northern town of Beit Lahiya, Israeli shells struck a U.N. school where 1,600 people had sought shelter. One shell scored a direct hit on the top floor of the three-story building, killing two boys, U.N. officials said.

The 12-member Security Cabinet was expected to back an Egyptian-brokered proposal for a 10-day cease-fire during which Israeli troops would remain on the ground while longer term arrangements are hammered out with international backing.

But Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum said a unilateral cease-fire was not enough.

Shortly after the Israel offensive began three weeks ago, Egyptian officials sought to broker a truce between Israel and Hamas, neither of which will speak directly to the other.

From their hideouts inside Gaza, local Hamas leaders appeared to welcome an agreement earlier this week, but Hamas officials based in Damascus took a more defiant line, and their approach seemed to win out.

At a meeting of the Arab League yesterday in Doha, the Qatari capital, the Damascus-based leader of Hamas's political wing, Khaled Meshaal, again rejected Israel's conditions for a ceasefire, leaving little prospect of a bilateral agreement anytime soon.

Below is the text of a prepared statement- the highlighted section is the part that struck me as the one many readers and users will seize on as not matching with reports from Gaza:


We have no disagreement with the residents of Gaza. We consider the Gaza Strip a part of the future Palestinian state with which we hope to live a life of good neighborliness, and we wish for the day when the vision of two states is realized.

During the operation, we made widespread and concerted efforts to see to the humanitarian needs of the Palestinian population.

More details as they emerge.

Feed Reader

No items in the feed.

Feed Reader

amyjudd
amyjudd
flagged this story as Breaking

at 13:04 on January 17th, 2009

jordan, thanks for getting this story out so quickly. It will now show up on the home page for four hours. If new developments justify it, I'll renew this flag for another cycle.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
René

Well, if Hamas won't stop.....

0
Heritage

Gaza Carnage counter/widget available here: http://blog.sweetestmemories.com/default.asp?Display=1672 
Gaza Carnage Counter

1
Barry Artiste

Lets hope it will actually stick this time, but I fear it wont

0
158

Thank you for getting this.

I just hope it holds.

0
mazevedo

It would be nice to see some peace in that region!

0
slimmey

Nice update. Hope it lasts this time, ain't it the third time they've announced a cease fire?


2
con10t

There is no such thing as a unilateral ceasefire. Its dictionary meaning, and the Ceasefire entry on Wikipedia define the term Ceasefire as:

"A ceasefire (or truce) is a temporary stoppage of any armed conflict, where each side of the conflict agrees with the other to suspend aggressive actions. Ceasefires may be declared as part of a formal treaty, but they have also been called as part of an informal understanding between opposing forces."

Please stop feeding the 'hearts and minds' phase 4 of the Israeli war crime machine! Let's hope citizen journalism can see through the TV antics of mass global media!

The proper term for the Isreali action that begins at 2AM Sunday morning is Military OccupationHold-Your-Fire.

0
Fripouille

Oh, well I guess that changes everything. After all, if Wikipedia says so....

I just looked up the verb "to diss" as in talk disrepectfully to someone, on Wikipedia. For Wikipedia though, Diss is a town in Norfolk England. But that verb has existed for years!! Moreover, "to diss" isn't in my personal dictionary either.

In other words, and with all respect, it's not because a dictionary says so that something  does, or doesn't exist. Israel decided to stop firing first, announce it, and hopes Hamas stops firing too.

Where on earth is the problem there?

Anything else is just semantic.......

(ps, "military occupation hold-your-fire" isn't in Wikipedia either....)

1
Blue Crush

Fripouille, look up "diss" again.

But, like moonwolf said, your point is?

0
Fripouille

Thank you Blue Crush.

So it's in Wiktionary, not Wikipedia. Well at least we all agree that it exists. And that what dictionaries say cannot be quoted as fact. Depends on the dictionary, depends on your point of view. No problem. Thanks for pointing that out.

But my "point", word you borrow from another comment, was not the verb diss, as I'm sure you know. I just discussed my "point" in a comment to Moonwolf.

Now, with all due respect, what on earth was YOUR point in writing your comment?

Thanks

1
Blue Crush

My point was that most people find Wikipedia very reliable, and up to date - it linked me to Wiktionary, when typing in DIS, which is how we spell it here.  Let's not "dis" Wikipedia, we all use it.

0
Fripouille

Oh I agree Blue Crush.

I use wikipedia often (ok, every day!) :) It's just that I tend not to use it (or any other dictionary) as being THE authority, particularly for words like "ceasefire" or "negotiation". lol!.

I didn't get (or see?) the link to Wiktionary though. Hmmm.

You spell that "Dis"? That's probably where that confusion comes from. I am looking at an old copy of an english music paper that gives "Diss". Typo? Dunno...

I know this is off-subject, but I often go to wikipedia with my second morning coffee and after checking email and the headlines.

This morning? "Mick Ronson". Guitarist for Bowie's Ziggy band. Why? Lord only knows, but I just love wikipedia....

Like, as you say, us all......

Excellent evening to you!

0
Blue Crush

Thanks, Fripouille.  As do I, use Wikipedia, pretty much every day, not as an only reference, but usually as the first.  I appreciate having that site handy.  So I guess you understand what I mean?  : >)     It was at the bottom of the last link, under Acronyms & slang.

BTW - Bowie Fan, must have gone to half a dozen of his concerts.

0
Karen Hatter

 

2
Blue Crush

There's the Obama inauguration, and then there's this, from HuffingtonPost, on the 15th:

... reportedly wants a three hour ceasefire to allow its troops to watch the 15th annual Screen Actors Guild awards, live from Hollywood on January 25. "It's the only awards show where only actors vote for actors," said a government spokesman.

Israel will not seek a ceasefire for the Academy Awards on February 22 even though Waltz with Bashir, an Israeli film about the futility of war will probably be nominated. "We have no interest in a film that thinks war is futile," said the Israeli government spokesman. "We think war is moral, ethical, effective and a great political tool to keep indicted prime ministers in office."

Sounds ridiculous, doesn't it?  Hope the ceasefire sticks.



2
desik grabowski

It's a ceasefire agreed between Israel and the Americans as 'Operation Lead Cast ' was apparently  supposed to lead the cast of the new Obama administration down the pathway Israel wanted it  to take only political incompetence of the highest order in Israel saw its miltary operation to predetermine  Obama's Middle East policy not so much cause shock and awe as international disgust and horror  as  hundreds of Palestinian civilians were killed in pointless bombardments.


Funding Israel to the tune of $3 billion a year the US simply could no longer risk being associated with  Israel's  atavastic slaughter of the innocents  in Gaza , it's  an absolute PR disaster and I imagine state department officials were screaming down the phone in Hebrew ' Listen  schmucks, we are swearing in the President in a couple of days and he doesnt want any footage of more dead Palestinian women and kids fucking with his photo opportunity with his family. Now lose the war or we cancel the next cheque.Got it? '


0
158

''Israel apparently breached its cease-fire after about 45 minutes when live television pictures showed a flare come down in Gaza City.''

Get real.

A flare is not a weapon.

Did they also light a match??

0
Amy Judd

I'm not sure who you are addressing this to or who you are telling to 'get real' but I just updated this story with what I found and am looking for more information. That's also why it says 'apparently'.....

1
158

''A flare, also sometimes called a fusee, is a type of pyrotechnic that produces a brilliant light or intense heat without an explosion. Flares are used for signaling, illumination, or defensive countermeasures in civilian and military applications.'' ---wikipedia


A cease fire means stop firing weapons.  It does not prevent defensive measures like flares, or sentries, or binoculars or watchdogs.


0
Paschen

Sorry to read that.

1
con10t

it was never a ceasefire. that requires two parties. it was a hold-your-fire, an attempt to garnish some percentage points in the hearts and minds campaign that accompanies all war, especially those parties who practice blatant war crime such as Israel. a country that excuses their mass murder of children in alengthy hateful war of attrition against a soverteign people, with the thin excuse of homemade rockets provoked again by the terror of Israel against a neighbor, and therefore, all humanity.

1
158

You are splitting hairs.

In the military there is an order. "cease fire".  It mkeans now stop firing.  That is what Israel did, ordered its soldiers to stop shooting.

Would you prefer that Israel keep killing Gazans?

How many more?

Another 1,000?  5,000?

Do you accuse Barrack Obama of being a war criminal?

Obama..I would act against anyone firing rockets at my family.




1
Vinny

There where 2 flares one after the other, I watched live on this feed (mms://media2.sonara.net/online2) as they were dropped.

0
Amy Judd

But a flare should be ok shouldn't it? Is that terms to call off a cease fire do you think? (I don't know, I'm just asking)

0
Vinny

I don't know either Amy, can a flare hurt anyone!

0
Amy Judd

If a flare is fired close enough to you I guess it could, but not from falling through the sky I should think!

1
158

A thousand flares is not a violation.In war, especially in a cease fire, flares are fired for light to see if someone is sneaking up on you,  The alternative is to fire a machine gun.

0
Emilio Lizardo

Flares are very often made of white phosphorus, Amy. As you know, these can be very dangerous ...

0
con10t

i am not splitting hairs. and obviously i think the killing should stop and all israelis should arrest their child maimers, murderers and war criminals and prosecute to full extent of the law without delay.

Obama did not propose mass murder, or is to 'act' as you equate with obama's words, to kill babies and children as Isreal does by the dozen daily?

in short, no, no.

to act as obama says is not as you state to commit war crime. did it occur to you that there are successful, and therefore always communicative and peaceful, alternatives to committing war crime and burning children alive morning, noon and night as Israel obviously prefers, to hammer fiercely, bomb hospitals with phorsphorus, burn un food depots.

and ceasefire in the context of war can mean to hold fire, but that always assumes unilaterality. however to modify the term ceasefure with unilateral as the war criminal regime of Israel dis today, is to assume they are not stupid and wish to world read their message as an oxymoron, but that they hope the world understands ceasefire in its general sense (check Wikipedia Ceasefire entry) and that any action is a breach of some phantom truce.

it is completely sick. Actually beyond that. Israel is perfecting the loss of honesty, accountability and human decency that Bush has robbed the planet of for 8 years. sad to say but Israel is clearly an upscale terrorist nation, now institutionalizing terror as Germany has, England has, Japan has in past times.

do all you can to swiftly bring your criminal government to justice and restore peace and tolerance and basic rights for all neighbors. sorry to preach but what can you do? an option would be only to rant about just how evil Israel is, how it has not right anymore to exist, and such provocations. i prefer still to hope the human beings living in israel will act now and prosecute their child murdering political and military leadership, all involved with the massacre over the holiday season, during the US political accuum period.

1
Vinny

Within the last minute there has been gunfire and loud bangs on a live feed from the border.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

danesller0127
First Flagged at 1:13 PM, Jan 17, 2009 by danesller0127
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (64)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from