Israel Cuts off Food Supply to 1.5 Million Civilians in Gaza City

by kate | November 22, 2008 at 11:01 am
247 views | 8 Recommendations | 4 comments

Again Gaza is being squeezed, this time with Israel refusing international pressure to let food through to the 1.5 million civilians who live there.

For the second time this week, Israel on Thursday resisted a plea by United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to ease its blockade of the Gaza Strip

There is only enough food to last the weekend. There are blackouts. I don't understand why the world is standing by and letting this happen. These are civilians.

Israel says "accounts of shortages are exaggerated to stir sympathy for Gaza" and they have banned reporters from entering. What possible reason could there be to ban reporters, unless they don't want the world to see what a modern holocaust looks like.

Israel says they are doing this because there are rockets coming into Israel from Gaza. But according to the LA Times, the rockets halted Thursday, and still there is no food.

Hamas and Islamic Jihad announced Thursday that they were ready to halt the attacks if Israel opened the crossings and stopped the incursions. The attacks from Gaza tapered off Thursday; the Israeli army counted just one incoming rocket, which caused no harm.


recommend This comment thread is now closed
2
kate

Israel is not being asked to supply this food, only to let it through. But it is not letting it through.


By the way, it is hard to understand a focus on legal duties when there are people starving. The image here is of one and a half million people facing starvation, and you standing there watching, and saying "no one is under any obligation to help". What about an ethical argument, won't that do?

1
Navida Ullah

What the law says or doesn't say is irrelevant faced with a human induced crisis akin to a modern day holocaust. The Jewish people have first hand experience of this so how can those who themselves have been persecuted treat innocent women and children in the same way. The Israeli attack must stop in the name of humanity.

I agree International Law says a country has a right to protect its borders and its people and that any force it uses in its defence must be proportionate. Each life is precious but i don't think that 393 Palestinian dead to 4 Israeli dead is proportionate. Not when 20% of the dead are women and children and not when 40% of the 2000 injured are women and Children and not when 750,000 of the 1.5 million population is made up of children under 18!

Its not about race or religion, its about 1.5 million innocent PEOPLE being locked in an area half the size of the Isle of Man (UK) without food, water or heating and being treated like rats whilst another nation, contrary to international law, slaughters them one by one. Little or no aid is getting through to these people, the borders are closed, the hospital can not cope and there are limited medical supplies. We are not asking Israel to give anything just to let those people who do want to help, actually help the needy. Let the aid through.

 

0
jerusalemjudy

What does international law say about Israel's obligations to provide anything for Gaza?? 

  • Article 23 of the Fourth Geneva Convention permits states like Israel to cut off fuel supplies and electricity to territories like Gaza. It only requires Israel to permit passage of food, clothing, and medicines intended for children under fifteen, expectant mothers, and maternity cases. Moreover, Israel would be under no obligation to provide anything itself, just not to interfere with such consignments sent by others. Article 70 of the First Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1977 creates a slightly broader duty regarding the provision of essential supplies, but it does not list fuel and electricity as items for which passage must be permitted.
  • Dependence on foreign supply - whether it be Gazan dependence on Israeli electricity or European dependence on Arab oil - does not create a legal duty to continue the supply. Absent specific treaty requirements, countries may cut off oil sales to other countries at any time. In addition, neither Israel nor any other country is required to supply goods in response to its foes' resource mismanagement or lack of natural bounty.
  • There is no precedent that creates legal duties on the basis of a former military administration. For instance, no one has ever argued that Egypt has legal duties to supply goods to Gaza due to its former military occupation of the Gaza Strip. Furthermore, control of airspace does not create a legal duty to supply goods either. For instance, UN Security Council-ordered no-fly zones in Iraq and Libya were not seen as the source of any legal duty to supply those countries with electricity, water, or other goods.
  • for more comprehensive discussion of this go to http://tinyurl.com/5mypkz

    0
    poor oligarch

    BBC Radio 4 has been carrying reports all day about this increasing humanitarian crisis. From the UN, from the Save The Children charity, etc.

    Legal niceties are irrelevant.

    This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

    What is NowPublic?

    NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

    Find out more

    Crowd Power

    Blue Crush
    First Flagged at 12:10 PM, Nov 22, 2008 by Blue Crush

    Most Recommended Stories in World

    Recommendations (8)

    Most recently recommended by:
     

    closeSign in to NowPublic

    is reporting from