NP Rank:
Israeli Commander on Gaza: "We Rewrote the Rules of War"
Previously unreleased testimony of an Israeli commander, serving as a commander during the three week winter military campaign known as Operation Cast Lead, which was implemented in December 2008 in the Gaza Strip/Palestinian Territories, reveals he did not believe the " .... longstanding principle of military conduct known as "means and intentions", which requires an intended target show his/her intent to use a weapon, was necessary before proceeding to target Palestinians for attack during Operation Cast Lead.
His remarks reinforce testimonies from soldiers who served in the Gaza operation, made to the veterans' group Breaking the Silence and reported exclusively by this newspaper last July. They also appear to cut across the military doctrine – enunciated most recently in public by one of the authors of the IDF's own code of ethics – that it is the duty of soldiers to run risks to themselves in order to preserve civilian lives. Explaining what he saw as the dilemma for forces operating in areas that were supposedly cleared of civilians, the senior commander said: "Whoever is left in the neighbourhood and wants to action an IED [improvised explosive device] against the soldiers doesn't have to walk with a Kalashnikov or a weapon. A person like that can walk around like any other civilian; he sees the IDF forces, calls someone who would operate the terrible death explosive and five of our soldiers explode in the air. We could not wait until this IED is activated against us."
Another soldier who worked in one of the brigade's war-room headquarters told The Independent that conduct in Gaza – particularly by aerial forces and in areas where civilians had been urged to leave by leaflets – had "taken the targeted killing idea and turned it on its head". Instead of using intelligence to identify a terrorist, he said, "here you do the opposite: first you take him down, then you look into it."
NowPublic on Facebook
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
Karen Hatter
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Recommendations (53)
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke
Redwater, Alberta, Canada -
YankeeJim
Arlington, Virginia, United States -
nanute
New York, United States -
stejeb
United Kingdom
-
Sputnic
London, United Kingdom -
Uwe Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada -
Rory Cripps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States -
Susan Marie Kovalinsky
Ledgewood, New Jersey, United States





Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (13)
at 10:05 on February 3rd, 2010
A very heated debate, it shows how badly Israel could be divided. The idea of allowing the army - any army - to investigate itself in such a conflict is pretty silly, that's why the UN stepped into the fray.
The attitude of the guy in the video, who wanted the army left to sort it out, while at the same time trying to demand that everyone else be investigated did the military no favours, especially in light of the demos organised to support the army even before any allegations were made.
The more that comes to light about operation cast lead the worse everyone involved looks.
at 10:12 on February 3rd, 2010
Preemption, Predictive targeting, are actionable and active strategies.
at 12:00 on February 3rd, 2010
We do have Laws of War. Has anyone seen a set of Rules of Engagement that was issued by the State of Israel and then what was issued to the soldiers.
Government issue Rules of Engagement to their solidiers. The big governmental ROE is a legal document, which is then broken down for use by commanders at all levels. At the pointed end the soldiers are normally issued a cue card with the pertinent details of the ROE.
A comparison of the action with the ROE would see what violations took place by the military and depending on the ROE there may also be a violation by the gov. Lawyers are normally involved in the drafting of these ROE.
at 12:01 on February 3rd, 2010
Good story Karen.
at 15:01 on February 3rd, 2010
Yes, Karen, excellent story.
at 15:12 on February 3rd, 2010
Thank you, Karl, SMK and Everyone for your comments.
at 16:07 on February 3rd, 2010
It would be wonderful if there were no wars and we all played fair and nice and followed the rules. But I don't see that happening anytime soon.
at 17:02 on February 3rd, 2010
Good post Karen, sad reality.
at 17:22 on February 3rd, 2010
Did anyone bother to tell the Palestinians about the rules when they were targeting Israeli civilians?
at 17:24 on February 3rd, 2010
Good question Hugh, and if they did, did they rewrite them too?
at 22:02 on February 3rd, 2010
A masterpiece! Keep up the good work Karen... sonoma wineries sonoma valley wineries
at 22:09 on February 3rd, 2010
Thank you, Deanne Willams.
at 05:42 on February 4th, 2010
Cointelpro is alive and well. It has morphed into COPS, etc. Nowpublic's Scrivener is a victim of Cointelpro. Sad. Plus ca change.