NP Rank:
Israel's parliament rejects Anti- Arab loyalty oath bill
A bill that proposes immigrants and 16 year old Israelis to take an oath of loyality to the state,promise to perform military service and respect the country'a values and symbols was rejected by Israeli parliament.
THis proposed pledge was required of all Israelis including minority Muslims and Christians.
The bill was proposed by hardliner nationalist Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman.
If approved, this bill would have created difficulties for the minority Arabs who form one fifth of the population of Israel.
An Israeli parliamentary committee scrapped Sunday a controversial bill that would have required Israelis to take a loyalty oath to the Jewish state in order to get citizenship and softened a law on commemorating the Naqba.
The bill, proposed by Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman's ultra-nationalist party was voted down eight to three. It needed the parliamentary committee's approval in order to go before the full Knesset, where it would require three votes to become law.
The proposed pledge required Arab Israelis, most of whom are Muslim or Christian, and Jewish Israelis to pledge allegiance to Israel as a Jewish state.
"I pledge loyalty to the state of Israel as a Jewish, Zionist and democratic state, to its symbols and values, to serve the state as much as I am required in military service or alternative service, as decided by law," read the proposed oath.
The bill targeted Arab Israelis, who have lately sided with their counterparts in Gaza and the West Bank against Israeli aggression, and many took part in the suppressed Nakba events that coincided with Israel's "Independence Day."
Crowd Power
-
israeli.agent
India
Recommendations (38)
-
Blue Crush
Toronto, Canada -
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan
-
tikun
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel -
albertacowpoke
Canada -
sara star
Halifax, NS, Canada -
Nauman Umair Khan
Pakistan -
Sri Lanka Army news
Colombo, Western, Sri Lanka




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (6)
at 19:46 on June 1st, 2009
I am glad it was rejected and I hope it they wont try to bring it back latter on.
This would have been a major blow to all minorities as well as all conscience objectors.
at 20:02 on June 1st, 2009
Asking the citizen to loyal to the country is one thing. But here what the bill proposing was to show allegiance to an religion and it's symbols.That makes this bill a joke.
It is always better to separate religion and politics.
.Agent.
at 20:17 on June 1st, 2009
I agree with you on that Agent.
at 23:59 on June 1st, 2009
"It is always better to separate religion and politics."
I totally agree with that...
at 02:31 on June 2nd, 2009
A salute to Solomon type justice it shines through and lights up clouds.
You will never separate Judaism from government but your can get religious wiseness.
at 03:41 on June 2nd, 2009
I supported getting rid of this unnecessary distraction. There are enough laws in Israel that define treason. I support the freedom to express any dissent regardless of how provoking it may be as long as it is with in the laws of the country. We have a very open and strong democracy and it certainly is able to allow for all kinds of expression.
We may have a public debate on these controversial issues but we seem to protect ourselves from legislation that can not hold up in the courts.