Israel's parliament rejects Anti- Arab loyalty oath bill

by israeli.agent | June 1, 2009 at 06:28 pm
164 views | 38 Recommendations | 6 comments

Photos

A bill that proposes immigrants and 16 year old Israelis to take an oath of loyality to the state,promise to perform military service and respect the country'a values and symbols was rejected by Israeli parliament.

THis proposed pledge was required of all Israelis including minority Muslims and Christians.

The bill was proposed by hardliner nationalist Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman. 

If approved, this bill would have created difficulties for the minority Arabs who form one fifth of the population of Israel.

An Israeli parliamentary committee scrapped Sunday a controversial bill that would have required Israelis to take a loyalty oath to the Jewish state in order to get citizenship and softened a law on commemorating the Naqba.

The bill, proposed by Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman's ultra-nationalist party was voted down eight to three. It needed the parliamentary committee's approval in order to go before the full Knesset, where it would require three votes to become law.

The proposed pledge required Arab Israelis, most of whom are Muslim or Christian, and Jewish Israelis to pledge allegiance to Israel as a Jewish state.

"I pledge loyalty to the state of Israel as a Jewish, Zionist and democratic state, to its symbols and values, to serve the state as much as I am required in military service or alternative service, as decided by law," read the proposed oath.

The bill targeted Arab Israelis, who have lately sided with their counterparts in Gaza and the West Bank against Israeli aggression, and many took part in the suppressed Nakba events that coincided with Israel's "Independence Day."

recommend This comment thread is now closed
3
Paschen

I am glad it was rejected and I hope it they wont try to bring it back latter on.

This would have been a major blow to all minorities as well as all conscience objectors.


3
israeli.agent

Asking the citizen to loyal to the country is one thing. But  here what the bill proposing was to show allegiance to an religion and it's symbols.That makes this bill a joke.

It is always better to separate religion and politics. 


.Agent.


3
Paschen

I agree with you on that Agent.

2
Nauman Umair Khan

"It is always better to separate religion and politics."

I totally agree with that...

1
Babel-Fish

A salute to Solomon type justice it shines through and lights up clouds.

You will never separate Judaism from government but your can get religious wiseness.     

1
tikun

I supported getting rid of this unnecessary distraction. There are enough laws in Israel that define treason. I support the freedom to express any dissent regardless of how provoking it may be as long as it is with in the laws of the country. We have a very open and strong democracy and it certainly is able to allow for all kinds of expression.

We may have a public debate on these controversial issues but we seem to protect ourselves from legislation that can not hold up in the courts.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Paschen
First Flagged at 7:46 PM, Jun 1, 2009 by Paschen
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in World

Recommendations (38)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from