Is Jack Layton Dreaming in Technicolour ?

by Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke | May 11, 2011 at 04:23 pm
343 views | 4 Recommendations | 9 comments

Photos

Official Opposition Leader Jack Layton

Official Opposition Leader Jack Layton

see larger image

uploaded by Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

New Democratic Leader's Jack Layton's Election Platform included as the first priority to "Strengthen Pensions and Income Security.  The newly elected Official Opposition Leader has called for unions, labour and provinces to to support his effort to pressure the Harper government to strengthen pensions. 

Addressing the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) in Vancouver, Layton said that Prime Minister Harper is practically alone in address the looming pension crisis.  The NDP election platform on pensions says the following:

We will work with the provinces to bring about increases to your Canada/Quebec       Pension Plan benefit, with the eventual goal to double the benefits you receive;

We will work with the provinces to build-in the flexibility for you and your employer to make voluntary contributions to your individual public pension account;

We will amend federal bankruptcy legislation to move pensioners and long-term disability recipients to the front of the line of creditors when their employers enter court protection or declare bankruptcy;

We will increase the annual Guaranteed Income Supplement to a sufficient level in the first budget to lift every senior in Canada out of poverty immediately.

While the idea may be a popular one with Canadians, it doesn't address any of the funding.  Canada has forcasted a deficit of $55 Billion, recently adjusted to $28 Billion, mostly created due to stimulus programs.  It also does not take into account the increasing number of baby boomers, who will become eligible for both the Canada Pension Plan (similar to Social Security in the US) and Old Age Security. 

While Europeans and others struggle with pension reform by increasing both contributions and the elegibility age, Jack Layton wants to eventually double these pensions.  His plan to increase the Guaranteed Income Supplement also comes with a $700 Million annual bill. 

In his address to the CLC Layton said:

"A majority of the provincial governments have recognized the brewing storm. And the overwhelming consensus amongst these provinces is that the most pragmatic, responsible response is to strengthen the guaranteed public pensions-the Canada Pension Plan and Quebec Pension Plan.   All they are waiting for is a federal government that's ready to act."

Layton said he is ready to work with all provincial leaders, regardless of party and that by working together real pressure would be put on the Harper government to act.

The New Democratic Party was the third party in the last minority Parliament with 36 seats.  During the May 2nd election it gained 56 seats in Quebec, mostly at the expense of the Block Quebecois.  Layton is now under pressure to retain and build on his new found popularity, not only in Quebec , but also in the remainder of Canada.

The Conservative Party under Prime Minister Harper, which governed with a minority for five years, has finally elected a Majority Parliament and will no doubt move forward with its agenda.  This includes the budget introduced in the previous Parliament. 

Is he dreaming in technicolour or is this a first step to build more support across Canada? 

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
1
Edmund O'Connor

You do realize that the NDP had 36 seats going into the 2011 election, not 43?

1
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

You're absolutely right and I will change it forthwith.  In fact the Conservatives had 143, Liberals 77, BQ 47, NDP 36, Independents 2, and 3 vacant.  Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.

1
foxy10935

I for one will not hold my breath on Layton's pipe dream.....I really can't see this happen in my life time......great report.....thanks

1
foxy10935

I for one won't hold my breath....Layton is having a pipedream.....can't see this happening in my life time.......great report thanks.......this is the second time I've made this comment hope it gets posted this time.

2
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

Lol both comments were posted. It won't happen in the way Layton thinks for the foreseeable future.  Harpers agenda will be to balance the budget and go from there.

0
Piobar

A balanced budget and a viable Canada Pension Plan/Old Age Security program are, sadly, not exactly compatible, the way things stand. Apart from monetary shortcomings, which the media has done a great job of covering, there are also issues with the processing timeframes, as well as staff shortages, which seem to get overlooked. Not only that, but the budget so recently rejected and soon to be forced through again by the conservative party is calling for further cuts to staffing within Human Resources and Skills Development Canada, or Service Canada, the department that deals with Unemployment Insurance and Pensions. Far more staff will need to be cut, based on the stats available through the government’s various websites, than are intending to retire within the immediate future. And, if you take into account the apparent average age of the staff, there WILL be a large decrease in the next few years, when they do retire, leaving no one to do the job. Jack Layton can sit back and say whatever he likes, safe in the knowledge that he is in opposition and will not have the chance to do any of this. The fact remains that there are serious issues with the system, which go beyond how much people are paying and or receiving, and which neither he, nor anyone else, can do a thing about while the Conservatives have a majority, unless they magically start listening to their concerned constituents… and that is another thing I would not be holding my breath for!

1
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

I think we can all agree that we can do things smarter.  Having worked in Ottawa, it is no rocket science that many positions exist to support the position of a director.  While I agree that not everything can be cut, I think some of the paperwork that is being used now can be cut considerably. There should also have been a saving by going digital and no longer requiring to do tasks manually. 

I know I know, computer created more work than they saved.  We do have a problem though with the onslaught of retiring baby boomers.  Somehow people will have to be trained to take their positions.

I think it will also be difficult to take dramatic measures without dealing with the Public Service Unions.  None of it is a strict political solution.  You need to get the unions on side.

0
Piobar

I agree whole-heartedly, it IS time the government started working smarter not harder, particularly since so few of the higher-ups, whether in the civil service or elected officials, are willing to work hard. Cutting employees is not the way to save money, in actual fact at this point it makes things worse; those who are left are forced to work obscene amounts of overtime, making the staffing costs no cheaper, but the work quality far inferior. The major wasting of funds is at the top, whether it is paying back-benchers and senior civil servants more in a year than many Canadians earn in three to do less in five years than most Canadians do in a week, or allowing childish squabbling between department heads over jurisdiction, rather than solving the problems they are being paid to solve. There are ways to save money in government; but until the folks at the top decide to actually start doing something about it, sadly, we will all keep paying through the nose.

 

YankeeJim, on this site, has written a great book on Smart Data, which I think everyone in <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 />Ottawa should be made to read. If they want to pay fewer staff, they need to give those remaining the tools to actually do the job; so far, they have failed to do so, and the points raised in the book are definitely a great guide to doing that. Also, General Hillier’s book has some exceedingly good points on what is wrong with the government, particularly with spending habits, supply contracts, and senior civil servants, which really aught to be mandatory reading as well. He highlights key issues such as paying three times more for something of lesser quality, because it is Canadian, and the company won the contract to supply it; he also discusses the squabbling of unelected heads of various departments, whose main goal is to do nothing until their next position opens up.

 

Change is needed, but it needs to be top to bottom, and the current government does not seem to understand that. I have my doubts that Layton has any better a grasp than Harper about the need to make it into the twentieth century. Hiring staff now, to take over the reigns when the Baby-Boomers in the civil service all retire, (which they have started to do already) is an important step. It also makes modernizing the way government runs a lot easier, because younger staff are more willing to accept change. But when all those layoffs to government employees were happening last year, I am willing to put money on the fact that it was those younger, more flexible staff that got the axe. Ottawa does not get it, and until things completely break down, I doubt they will....

0
Gary Neal

Something needs to be done. I'm glad that Jack Layton is suggesting the reforms. We need some help for this economy. I'm doing okay because I have a Canada pension plan, but I know other people are struggling, and they need to be helped.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from