Jerusalem expansion 'dismays' White House

by Susan Marie Kovalinsky | November 17, 2009 at 12:27 pm
258 views | 34 Recommendations | 15 comments

Photos

Loading photos...

Israeli expansion disappoints and dismays White House 

House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs has said that the White House is "dismayed"  at Israel's plan to expand its Gilo settlement. 

 The  addition of an extra 900 housing units has been approved by the Israeli Ministry.  

Read Babel-Fish's Now Public piece here,  and I must agree with his opinion:  This is incendiary on Israel's part. 

The White House said on Tuesday that it was "dismayed" over Israeli approval to expand the Gilo settlement in Jerusalem and sharply criticized the ongoing evictions and demolition of Palestinian homes.

"At a time when we are working to relaunch negotiations, these actions make it more difficult for our efforts to succeed," White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said in a statement.

U.S. President Barack Obama has urged Israel to curb settlement expansion as a gesture of goodwill to Palestinians in an effort to restart the peace process.

Israel on Tuesday approved the building of 900 homes for Jews on West Bank land it occupied in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war and annexed to its Jerusalem municipality.

The Israeli daily Yedioth Ahronoth said Obama's envoy, George Mitchell, had asked an aide to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at a meeting in London on Monday to block the proposed construction at the settlement of Gilo.

A U.S. official confirmed the report.

But an Israeli government planning commission approved the addition of 900 housing units at Gilo, where 40,000 Israelis already live.

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
2
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

Do  you think this declaration yesterday had something to do with it?

JERUSALEM -- A Palestinian drive to ask the U.N. Security Council to endorse a state unilaterally, put forward by a top negotiator Sunday, appeared more an expression of frustration with U.S. and Israeli policies and stalled peace talks than a real effort to go it alone.

A resolution for a Palestinian state could face a veto from the U.S., Israel's main ally. But if the Security Council approved it, consequences could be even more severe.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected the move, warning Israel would retaliate.


1
YankeeJim

This just shows how indpendently and disrespectful the parties are of any outside influencers or stakeholders. The only way to get Israel's attention is though a US backed UN vote. The same is true for Palestine, though they are clearly way behind the power curve.

2
Susan Marie Kovalinsky

Ah HA!  Indeed,  I do  -thanks!!!

2
a211423

It's getting increasly difficult to reconcile the actions of Israel with a negotiable peace.  And when you see the conditions in Gaza in comparison, how can the U.S., or any country for that matter, continue to support actions that continue to jeopardize movement towards a two state solution.   

2
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

I have always thought that it takes two to tango.  We can all sit in our comfy homes in North America where no one is throwing rockets at us.  There is enough blame to go around on both sides and with news reports somewhere in the middle is the truth.

Politicians in the West also have to quit talking out of both sides of their mouth and they do when it comes to that region.

Administration after Administration have promised to take care of this problem, but none, including this one, is ready to make the hard decisions to sort it out.


2
Susan Marie Kovalinsky

Yes,  A  very much I agree.  I suppose Pocci makes a good point too, although I tend to side with the underdog,  which I view the Palestinians as.  

3
a211423

Pocci? LOL

Yes, I understand that we in North America do not live with the daily fear of attacks, and this is why I have been sympathetic with Israel as they have been surrounded, and keeping the balance of power in the region is necessary.  But seeing how the Palestinians are treated I cannot reconcile Israel's recalcitrant attitude when solutions are posed.  It's like they undermining attempts to progress. 

2
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

For the record I'm not taking any sides here.  I look at the long history dating to pre-1948 and I can find sympathies with both sides.  I still maintain though that it takes two to tango.  The Palestinians still don't speak with one voice and I suspect that makes it difficult to negotiate. The problem is that we get nothing but video bytes and sound-bytes from our media. 

Most Op/Eds on the region are packed with emotion.  Bottom line is I feel sympathy for both sides. 

0
Susan Marie Kovalinsky

Yes,  'pocci'  is the french of "albertacowpoke",  as in "mon cheri pocci poo"--tee hee 

2
Hugh Askew

Let's face it. Israel is surrounded by a couple of hundred million muslims. They were run out of Europe at the end of WWII......what was left of them.  Anyone remember that?

The Arabs, including the Palestinians, refuse to recognize Israel's right to existence (Egypt being the exception). What should Israel do? Wave the white hankie?

In the meantime, Syria an Iran send massive quantities of money and weaponry to the Palestinians. When do people start yelling about that?

What should Israel do?  When and where have concession by Israel made any difference? Anyone have a comprehensive list?  It is really short, should be easy.

Any Arab or Muslim countries lining up to recognize Israel as a sovereign state?  Any of them recognizing or abiding by  UN Resolution 181?




1
David D.

Anyone taking the side of the Palestinians must be delusional. Look at the shiploads of arms way-layed on the way to Hamas and other terrorist organizations. Israel offers the only stable peace in the middle east. These are the words of Golda Meir. The U.S, especially our President, needs to keep their muslim loving thoughts to themselves and stay out of the affairs of Israel. 

0
David D.

Anyone taking the side of the Palestinians must be delusional. Look at the shiploads of arms way-layed on the way to Hamas and other terrorist organizations. Israel offers the only stable peace in the middle east. These are the words of Golda Meir. "We can forgive the Arabs for killing our children. We cannot forgive them for forcing us to kill their children. We will only have peace with the Arabs when theylove their children more than they hate us".The U.S, especially our President, needs to keep their muslim loving thoughts to themselves and stay out of the affairs of Israel. 

1
tikun

I am not going to get into a verbal tit for tat here about Israel. We all know pretty much where the regulars on NP stand.

As far as the TOPIC of the article is concerned Gilo has been a contiguous community in Jerusalem since 1967 officially. But actually Jewish land owned prior to that but lost during the 1948 war. The PM of Israel never agreed to not allow Jerusalem communities to expand naturally. He did state this morning that he has agreed to halt expansion of  any communities outside of the Jerusalem municipality. 

I must remind you that this is all a red-herring. The PM has stated just recently that he wants to sit down with Abbas, in fact called him yesterday, and discuss terms of an agreement. The dilemma arises with the unwillingness of Fatah to accept Israel as a Jewish State in the region.  That is the rub for the Palestinian Authority. It still has this hope that Israel will disappear by undermining it from with in or destroying it from without even if it means the destruction of the entire region by Iran.

I just read some where that revenge is an emotion that defies logic and necessity. Interesting!

Also, Hamas yesterday stated that it is foolish to want a State 0n 67 borders and not the whole of "Palestine" from the river to the sea. This is not at all encouraging from where I am sitting.


1
Hugh Askew

From the river to the sea, eh?  That settles the issue on what concessions the Palestinians will agree to, that peace might proceed apace. Nada, except the complete destruction of the Jewish nation.

0
Susan Marie Kovalinsky

That may be so.  For them,  it may be so. 

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Babel-Fish
First Flagged at 12:40 PM, Nov 17, 2009 by Babel-Fish
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (34)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from