Julie Jacobson Photo: Scandal Over Released Shot of Dying Marine

by Tina Kells | September 4, 2009 at 01:45 pm
10889 views | 41 Recommendations | 60 comments

The shocking death photo released by AP and taken by staff photographer Julie Jacobson is growing into a scandal and precipitating some heated debate about the people's right to know verses a family's right to privacy. The death photo of Lance Corporal Joshua Bernard is part of an essay of photographs intended to show a day in the life of a soldier in Afghanistan. When Julie Jacobson began shooting footage that day she could not have known the tragedy that her camera would capture, or that she would end up taking a photo showing a US soldier, Joshua Bernard, receiving a fatal wound.

Videos

Joshua Bernard Death Video | Dying Marine Video and Photos

see larger video

sourced by Tina Kells

Joshua Bernard Death Video | Dying Marine Video and Photos

Some say that his death, and the horror of it, is part of the daily life of soldiers in Afghanistan, and in that sense the Julie Jacobson photo does exactly what it intended to do. But others claim that Julie Jacobson and the AP showed grave insensitivity to Joshua Bernard and his loved ones, and that war reporting should not be sensational and should always show compassion. Both arguments are valid.

War is not pretty and young soldiers on both sides of the conflict die every day. Had it not been captured on film by Julie Jacobson the death of Joshua Bernard would have been another statistic. Instead the image of his death is forcing Americans to see beyond the statistics. Joshua Bernard puts a human face on death, and Julie Jacobson should not be vilified for showing that face to America. It is a reality check that is long overdue.

However, Joshua Bernard should not have been made a poster-boy for the horrors of war without the clear consent of his family. His father, with the support of the US Secretary of Defense, repeatedly asked the AP not to released the death photo, and they did so anyway. This kind of callous disregard for human decency can't go unaddressed, even if you agree that the horrors of the war should be exposed.

How do you feel? Should the AP have kept the Julie Jacobson photo of Joshua Bernard from the public? Was it patriotic to release it, or would it have been patriotic to keep it under wraps? Tell us what you think.

It is a scene that plays out daily among American troops in Afghanistan and Iraq, but one that has largely been unseen by the American public in eight years of war.

On Friday, after a couple of weeks of intramural debate and over the objections of the young man’s father (supported by the defense secretary), The Associated Press released such a photograph, by Julie Jacobson.

It depicts Lance Cpl. Joshua M. Bernard, 21, of New Portland, Me., shortly after he was struck by a rocket-propelled grenade during a Taliban ambush of his squad last month in Dahaneh, Afghanistan. He lost one of his legs in the attack and died later at a Marine compound during surgery. To provide context for this deeply troubling image, the A.P. sent out a series of photos before and after the attack, a news article about the attack, an article about the decision to distribute the picture, excerpts from Ms. Jacobson’s journal and a video that she narrated.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
5
Former Marine

Follow the money....Julie Jacobson and the AP aren't selling anything and now they are.  You should be ashamed of yourselves.

3
Marine Doc

I am sickened and disgusted by the AP and Ms Jacobson's actions in both taking and publishing the photo's of LCPL Bernard, especially in light of his family asking that they not be published.I am a physician stationed with a large Marine Battalion at Camp Pendleton. 7 of my Marines were hospitalized this week due to PTSD exacerbations triggered by this photograph. Was it worth the publicity and the $ Ms Jacobson to traumatize a family who had just learned of the passing of their son and brother not to mention countless other Marines? You have no soul and may God keep this in mind on your judgment day.

1
kdk

Follow the money is great advice, but you don't follow it.  Follow the investments our gov has in oil, weapons, pharma and the like and you should see why we are at 'war'... it is a police action for no war has been declared--or has it?  Yeah, follow the MONEY to bushy, cheney and most 'reps' in our gov.  Call yourself a marine.. what do you fight for marine?  To be free?  LOL.  CENSORSHIP is not conducive to freedom.  He gave his life if the public that put him there just lets his death be a number with no emotion.  They pump you full of emotion and want you to sponsor war, but the emotion that comes with the reality of war is something that could stop 'wars' and police actions.Uncensored news is news.  Abu Ghirab photos were mostly hidden as well.  Hmmm.  Seems to work rather well if the reporters work for and with the gov. 

0
TheRealist

Come on. How often do we see anything but pictures allowed by our oppressive government. Our Gov't has been trying to take over our lives for too long and people still care to jump and say we cannot see a picture? I've seen so many pictures of dead Iraqis. Civilians even, but we are not allowed to see what the cost is in American lives. I'm glad the AP had the guts to publish the images. We need to see more of what actually occures during war so more people have reasons not to want war.

5
Babel-Fish

I have seen soldiers die, I have picked up the pieces it all horrifies me and perhaps the public should be horrified too? I feel that we should be more concerned with stopping such stupidity of sending soldiers of to pointless wars controlled by politicians and those that pull their strings.

On such an issue concerning a picture of a dead soldier the soldiers family should have been asked their permission first and if they had gave it then yes the picture should of been shown in all its gore as a reminder what war is all about and none of us humans should want our children to end up dead to appease those that make money and gain power out of war. 

I really would not want any of my sons to end up dead on a battle field to fight war no political indoctrination would persuade me it was for Queen/King and country or for the freedom of people as I know its all about money.  Julie Jackobson earns money by taken photo's and it those that publish them that are at fault. 


1
JMax

I am pretty sure people get the idea of what goes on over there. You should be ashamed of yourself, for allowing that photo to be published. If that was your husband, son, brother, father or someone of your family would you have published that photo, I doubt it.

3
Tina Kells

I am not Julie Jacobson and I agree with you 100%, the photo should only have been released with the consent of his family.

0
kdk

Why should we, the public that pays for this guys life and death, need permission to see what happens?  We shouldn't.  This soldier works for US, the citizens, and we have a right to know what happens to them.  It is not all, "gee, let's put on our headphones and blast the enemy to rock and rolll..."  Freakin ignorant.  I don't care to SEE the photo in detail, but our gov is corrupt as hell and use whatever they can for their advantage and nothing to their disadvantage... that is how it works. 

7
Glenda Hensley

My son is in Afghanistan. I pray to God if anything happens to him, some selfish reporter won't be trying to make a name for herself by standing over him and taking a photo. It sickens me that the AP would publish a photo of a dying marine against his parents wishes. Julie Jacobson and the AP should be ashamed of themselves. I guess money is more important to them than the additional grief they inflicted on an already grieving family. I am tired of the line they put out about keeping the public informed and putting a face on this war. If the parents had agreed I would not have been so upset, but to do this out of nothing but greed really irritates me to no end. I hope karma comes back to bite Ms. Jacobson and the AP. How horrible!!

6
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

As a former soldier myself.  I am disappointed that very little is shown of the plight of the soldiers in Afghanistan.  I think the Canadian media does a good job of showing what is going on in Afghanistan.  The American media hasn.t done enough, except maybe at the local level.

The picture may be a good record of what goes on in Afghanistan, nevertheless the families permission should have been asked.

I, for one, would not like to see my son and daughter in such a situation.

1
Mark Morris

The family's permission WAS asked, and permission was denied.  This occurred a couple of weeks ago, and the family had the support of the Secretary of Defense in asking the AP NOT to run the picture.  The AP disgraced themselves on this one.  Hopefully on some level, the public outrage will help the parties involved to get some sense of the shame they should feel for exploiting a dead warrior.  Absolutely despicable.

1
kdk

The reporters should NOT take their orders from the military.  What a foolish statement.  Go back to sleep and enjoy being in your home with the kids getting their heads and bodies blown apart.  Can't you sleep now that you have been exposed to the reality.  So many of you think the gov should be able to censor the 'news' (it already does and why the world is in such BS shape) and that is basically communism, fascism, and the like... yeah, they all censor reports as well..

9
Yetty

AP and Julie are a disgrace. This Young Marine gave his life for his country. Sec Def Gates asked you not to publish it and so did his family. Just goes to show you SOBs are not thankful for the men and women in uniform. Go to hell, all of you.

6
Pop

F**k you AP.

2
patrick livingston, sr

i am continually stupefied by the crass behavior of our media it was bad enough that the picture was even taken ( looking for a Pulitzer at the expense of a Marine?? ), but to have it distributed without the permissionof the family is disgusting just when i didn't think the AP could go any lower they prove me wrong i loo forward top seeing pictures of Julie Jacobson

3
Paul Blake

Censorship is a tool employed to dull the realities of the horrors of war.  However human compassion for the family of this child should bear more worth than it has received in this instance.  The AP editorial board should be ashamed of itself.  To seize on this particular horror is exploitive and a gross misuse of the very freedom that this young man has died for.  His family specifically pleaded that they not publish the photo yet they felt that the photo would reveal war for the horror it is.  The horror in this instance is that they made the shameful decision that they did.  Shame on you... shame.  You undermine and abuse the freedoms that we have entrusted you with... SHAME. 

3
Barry Artiste

Family members do not need to see their dying son or daughter on National Tv, losing them is hard as it is versus ratings grabs, Journalists know the rules, no excuse/.

3
Calans

The AP are a bunch of money hungry, fame seeking hypocrits. The reporter who covered this story (I refuse to mention it's name) should have it's US passport cancelled and should have to stay in Afghanastan.

1
kenneth albrecht

she really sucks!!!!!!!!!

1
Kevin J. Connolly

Jacobson and the AP are enemies of the American way of life. That way of life includes the freedom of the press, which Jefferson never imagined could ever be abused the way that it is today. The end result, due to the cupidity of the media, will be the abolition of freedom of expression as we now know it....and that is why I declare that Jacobson and the AP deserve to be torn into small shreds as traitors to America. In addition, they showed disrespect to a Marine, and before being torn into shreds, they should be abused brutally and miserably. So die all traitors.

2
Barbara Nystrom

Jacobson let us all know how you sleep at night.  You have just sold your sole for a buck...Let us know how that works out for you.   You should be ashamed of yourself and your establishment.  You didn't capture war, you captured a lifetime of anguish that a family will live over and over again whenever some self centered egotistical snob, such as yourself,  decides to throw this image up in there face...You have destroyed lives forever.  Good  for you.  Would'nt wanted to be reaping your seeds... 

0
fishboy

a whole soul for a buck- how much for a tuna?

1
Barbara Vugteveen

As the parents of a marine who has just completed his 3rd tour, this disgusts us.  No matter what your reasoning, AP, you are despicable.  And, Ms. Kells, I note that you have the video and pictures available for viewing.  Had it been my child, I would be suing the pants off of all of you.  This is not freedom of the press, this was, once again, sensationalism at it's finest.  I hope, Ms. Jacobson, that one of those mortars/bullets finds you so that your parents can live though this.  Just as, against thier wishes, the Bernards are.   It just goes to show, we have the best press that money can buy!  

2
screw_Julie_Jacobson

My login says it all.


Please post a pic of the next AP employee ( or family member!) who is about to die.  Make sure you get it before they die and are in obvious trouble so we can all speculate.....It must be graphic.   Please post family email addresses too, as obviously AP thinks nothing is private.

Very sorry people you are.  You can all go to ----.

Jim P




1
DCSmith

At least many of the media outlets showed more compassion and discretion by choosing not to run the photograph. It shows that not all of the media have sunken as low as the AP and Julie Jacobson. Thank you Ms. Kells for reporting both sides fairly of the debate and for clearly stating that you agree the photograph should not have been released without the consent of the family. But why have the link to the photo posted here? Isn't that just continuing to misuse this photo?

1
 Almeida

Whatever be the justification of AP and the news outlets that have published this photo - the family did not want it published, and that is the bottomline. AP should have respected the wishes of the family. The AP photographer may not have been at fault for taking the photo, but what happened subsequently appears to have been driven by financial greed. I think removal of all AP photographers embedded with our troops is called for.

1
John C.

I find it repulsive that the AP photographer and the AP itself found it necessary to post the photo of this brave young Marine. The boy's family indicated it didn't want the picture to be shown. Where is the sense of common decency here? All for the almighty $$$. Even if the decision makers in this process suffered a lifetime of sleepless nights because of this, I doubt it would come anywhere near close to that of the family of this young Marine.  May GOD rest his soul and comfort his family.

1
Mark Morris

Jacobson, her editor and the AP should all be touched by shame to their core, for the rest of their lives.  The media has countless images that portray the horrors of war.  This one serves absolutely NO additional purpose, and the family said that they did not want it published.  The US military should never allow her to embed with a unit again.  She is not trustworthy, and has no honor, character or integrity.  War is horrible enough, and for one family, she made it unimaginably worse.  They already lost a son/brother/cousin/nephew.  Now they have to deal with a national media that puts the almighty dollar ahead of the respect that should be afforded a family that paid the ultimate price.Shame on every media outlet that publishes the image.

0
william jones

I wonder what families of Jacobson or Curley would say if a picture of their rotting corpses were put on the web?

1
Jonell Traore

My deepest sympathies for the family.  I have lost a child, not to war, but I know a little about the loss of a child.  Having said that, I just feel like we need to see these images so that we can stop allowing the government to keep us willfully ignorant of what is going on.  Sanitized reality for the good of the few doesn't seem worth the loss that the rest of the world experiences.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Rhonda J Mangus
First Flagged at 2:28 PM, Sep 4, 2009 by Rhonda J Mangus
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (41)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from