Justice Thomas' former girlfriend incriminates him

by YankeeJim | October 22, 2010 at 10:55 am
129 views | 2 Recommendations | 3 comments

Photos

Impeach Clarence Thomas

Impeach Clarence Thomas

see larger image

uploaded by YankeeJim

“ I wouldn’t look good on this” former Thomas girlfriend

Three things jump out from this story: 1) a woman close to Clarence Thomas could have testified about his inappropriate remarks at work, 2) she did not testify because Senator Joe Biden didn’t ask her to, and 3) Clarence Thomas should not have been confirmed as Supreme Court Justice based on Lillian McEwen’s knowledge.

Add this to the apparent conflict of interest introduced by his wife thorough her political affiliations and recent actions interfering with Anita Hill, and I stand by my call for the impeachment of Justice Clarence Thomas and removal from the bench.

“Lillian McEwen breaks her 19-year silence about Justice Clarence Thomas

By Michael A. Fletcher

Washington Post Staff Writer 
Friday, October 22, 2010

For nearly two decades, Lillian McEwen has been silent -- a part of history, yet absent from it.

When Anita Hill accused Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment during his explosive 1991 Supreme Court confirmation hearing, Thomas vehemently denied the allegations and his handlers cited his steady relationship with another woman in an effort to deflect Hill's allegations.

Lillian McEwen was that woman.

At the time, she was on good terms with Thomas. The former assistant U.S. attorney and Senate Judiciary Committee counsel had dated him for years, even attending a March 1985 White House state dinner as his guest. She had worked on the Hill and was wary of entering the political cauldron of the hearings. She was never asked to testify, as then-Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.), who headed the committee, limited witnesses to women who had a "professional relationship" with Thomas.

Now, she says that Thomas often said inappropriate things about women he met at work -- and that she could have added her voice to the others, but didn't.

Over the years, reporters and biographers approached her eager to know more about Thomas from women who knew him well. But McEwen remained mum. She said she saw "nothing good" coming out of talking to reporters about Thomas, whom she said she still occasionally met. She did not want to do anything to harm her career, she added. Plus, she realized, "I don't look good in this."

Today, McEwen is 65 and retired from a successful career as a prosecutor, law professor and administrative law judge for federal agencies. She has been twice married and twice divorced, and has a 32-year-old daughter. She lives in a comfortable townhouse in Southwest Washington.”

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
YankeeJim

The sad part of this is that Clarence Thomas should have been smarter and more thoughtful about his personal behavior. He represents a throwback in bad behavior that was prevalent among men in that period of time...I guess.

1
Karen Hatter

I must confess, Jim, I am hoping that the media won't disappoint us all, going off in search of more Coke cans with pubic hairs and tales of Thomas' supposed punany hunts to sate his appetite.

As Virginia 'Ginni' Thomas was a member of George W. Bush's transition team in 2000, I would think it might be worth scrutinizing IF Justice Clarence Thomas should have recused himself instead of hearing and ruling on BUSH V GORE, which gave the election to George W. Bush by denying all Florida's ballots to be counted. Ginni Thomas being part of Bush's transition team has been known since 2000.

Ginni Thomas has been politically active for years. In 2000 she took flack for working on the Bush transition team even as her husband was hearing the case, Bush v. Gore, in which her husband backed her candidate, giving the election to George W. Bush by shutting down the Florida recount in a 5-4 Supreme Court decision.


1
Karen Hatter

Jim, there were several people lined up to incriminate Clarence Thomas' denials of improper behavior in 1991.

However, after over 100 days and seeing polling the showed some kind of sympathy and support for Clarence Thomas when he feigned outrage at the accusations, playing that card they call the 'race card', to which at the time, NO ONE, especially conservatives or the Right Wing objected, claiming to be a victim of ".... high tech lynching ...." , the all boys club that battered Professor Hill in 1991, quickly ended the confirmation process.  


This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Karen Hatter
First Flagged at 11:41 AM, Oct 22, 2010 by Karen Hatter
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (2)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from