Killing of Vanni Civilians

by Suranee | April 19, 2009 at 05:19 am
345 views | 4 Recommendations | 29 comments

The University Teachers for Human Rights in Jaffna Sri Lanka gives a detailed account of the atrocities committed on the civilians by both the LTTE and the Sri lanka government in their Information Bulletin No. 47 which was released on 17th April 2009.

We seldom receive independent accounts of current developments in the Vanni. The information provided in this bulletin is an exception. Given below are some cross-checked facts drawn from persons who recently escaped from the Vanni, which give the lie to the Government’s claims that it does not fire on the civilians and show clearly the LTTE’s cynical use of civilians as bargaining chips. They also speak to the impotence of the international community and India to stop the carnage. What we have learned:

·     Shells fall in the no-fire zone almost every day and take a heavy toll on civilians. Persons in regular touch with those who have escaped confirm that an average of 15 to 20 people die each day; either killed by shells or shot by the LTTE attempting to drive fear into would-be escapees.

·     The military is presently stationed some distance away from the lagoon. Thus they are able to spot movement – including movements of LTTE vehicles within the no-fire zone. Typically they rain a few shells soon after spotting a militant vehicle moving within the zone.

·     Persons who escaped on 8th April said that about the same day, the Army announced over speakers tied high up on palmyrah trees instructing the public to come across the lagoon into their area immediately, as they were going to advance into the no-fire zone. Soon afterwards, they fired a large shell right into the midst of the public, apparently to goad them into complying. This reportedly caused heavy casualties among the public. 

·     Many escapees from the no-fire zone testified to a heavy recruitment drive by the LTTE. The minimum age for conscription is now 14. There is no ceiling set on the maximum number that could be taken from one family.

·     The LTTE has recently started the practice of sending out teams of 6 cadres with instructions for each team to return with 30 conscripts. If they fail they are reportedly subject to heavy and often lethal punishment.

The Government today objects to ‘balanced criticism’ by governments, the UN and human rights agencies, because all of them demand restraint from it towards the besieged civilians. What the Government apparently seeks is a blank cheque to go on indulging in cost-free killing of Tamils in the name of warring against terrorism. Nothing can cover the absurdity of the Government’s position. The LTTE, confined and reduced by steady attrition poses no threat to the Government. It is merely postponing the inevitable, placing more and more conscripts and children before missiles of the Government, whom it is happy to blow to smithereens. This has been true for several months and a government with a minimal sense of responsibility should have looked to other political means.

As for the LTTE, most countries that count have declared it a terrorist group. In its present state of decay no one is going to breathe political life into it, unless the Government and the Sinhalese polity bungle their political act hopelessly. This is what they are doing by firing into the civilians in the no-fire zone and thereby committing a crime against humanity. These and other issues will be discussed in greater detail below, including the role of Tamil expatriates. We will conclude with several cases exemplifying the plight of civilians in the no-fire zone.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
3
israeli.agent

Familiar situation. Arm a civilian and send in front of the army. For a soldier anyone points a gun at him is an enemy.This will continue till the fate of Piraphagaran is decided.

.Agent.


1
Suranee

Do you honestly think that once Prabakaran is caught/killed that the civilians will be spared of this nightmare Agent?

The way I see it Agent, the nightmare will continue because the civilians will have another type of terrorism they will have to face, and that is Sinhalese terrorism. But it's not only the Tamil civilians who will have to face and endure it, but also the Sri lankans who value humanity and democracy.

2
israeli.agent

Short answer, Suranee is - Yes I do.

We need to have a head start. Right now the biggest obstacle in the way to peace is Prabhakaran and LTTE. It is utter foolishness to try to  finish all problems at a time, altogether. Once this menace which was looming over the every aspect of Sri Lanaka is over, people can really look at the next one in a more realistic way, free from the myopia of victor or looser syndrom.

Long answer is - I have no idea. It is up to that fact that how much the Sri Lankanks can think as "the people" rather than Sinhalese or Tamil or Muslims or Burger or Malay. Who knows maybe you will get spectacular results on the way, on trying.

It is up to you, people. Really.


.Agent.

1
Suranee

Once the LTTE is rid of, the way to peace is if we can get rid of Sinhala chauvinism Agent.

The Rajapakse regime's next move (once they finish off the LTTE) in my opinion is to bring a whole new different financial curse on the Sri lankans.

Tell me Agent, how would you like it if your government takes over you bank account/accounts which is your life savings and tells you how much you can withdraw and at the same time keeps a certain percentage of the interest? How about having you pay tax for sending your kids to prestigious schools? Would you like to live in a country, the country which is your birth right to live, if such laws were implemented by the government?

1
israeli.agent

Suranee,

People here, like me , you and so many others in this forum are just common people. We are not big policy makers who can decide the future of a country immediately. But what we can do is to shape our future.

My profession taught me that it is impossible to solve a big problem in a single attempt.The best approach would be to break the big problem into small small problems and then finish them off one by one , as I mentioned in my previous reply.

So , the questions come back to you. What would you do? If your country of birth is rotting under the present rule, would you run away from it or fight it. What I do may be or may not be right in your case. But the most important thing is what you will do? You hide? you fight or you freeze?

It all depends upon - sorry for repeating - the Sri Lankan people.

No external force can do anything.


.Agent.

0
Suranee

But Agent, how can citizens of a country make a change to make it a better place to live when the country is ruled by a dictator?

0
israeli.agent

Suranee,

Only the citizens of the country can make any change in their life. That needs will power and clarity of vision. It is simply not possible for someone from outside to come and make the changes for them. Outsiders may help a bit here and there.

As for dictatorship , history will give enough examples.

.Agent.

1
sathyajith

At first, also the Tamils who lives in Sri Lanka are Sri Lankans :-)

But it's not only the Tamil civilians who will have to face and endure it, but also the Sri lankans who value humanity and democracy.
0
Suranee

So why are "Sri lankan Tamils in the war zone" referred to as civilians and not Sri lankans?

2
israeli.agent

There are military

There are LTTE militants

There are non combatant Tamils LTTE took as hostages.

This is just for the ease of use, I guess - in a pure linguistic way.


.Agent.

1
sathyajith
So why are "Sri lankan Tamils in the war zone" referred to as civilians and not Sri lankans?

because,

  • Sri Lankans who live else where in Sri Lanka also civilians
  • Sri Lankans who live abroad also civilians

there for

  • Sri Lankans who live in war zone also civilians

or do you means thoes are not civilians??

0
Suranee

Their civilians all right but the thing is Sathyajith, there are some Sri Lankans who do not consider the civilians in the war zone to be "civilians" or Sri lankans" but instead, supporters of the LTTE.

Why do you think that they feel this way?

1
sathyajith

there are some Sri Lankans who do not consider the civilians in the war zone to be "civilians" or Sri lankans" but instead, supporters of the LTTE.

Why do you think that they feel this way?

Fortunately The so called "Some" are not all and you will find this kind some every where in every occasions all over the overld.

Most of  Sri Lankans do not see them as ltte supporters, even SLDF don't think so, otherwise they would have finished the LTTE weeks ago 

what do you think "Why the SLDF has slow down the hunt?

0
Suranee

Satyajith, the reason why the SLDF has not been able to finish the LTTE is because of the civilians that are being held by the LTTE. That is the reason why the SLDF has slow down the hunt.

I disagree with you when you say most Sri Lankans don't consider them as LTTE supporters.There are alot of Sri lankans (most of them from the Sinhalese ethinic group) who consider the Sri lankan Tamils supporters of the LTTE.

Tell me, do you accept that our ancestors originated from India?

1
sathyajith
Tell me, do you accept

Hm... do you think rejecting or accepting it has got to do anything with ltte or this dream land eelam??

0
Suranee

I simply asked you a question Sathyajith to which I was hoping for an answer and not a question?

Is the question I asked you too difficult to answer?

1
sathyajith

Nothing easier than that

It was realy in the other way as you know.

do you think rejecting or accepting it has got to do anything with ltte or this dream land eelam??

1
Suranee

A simple yes or no will do for an answer.

Here is the question again:

Tell me, do you accept that our ancestors originated from India?

Now to answer your question:

The LTTE or the dream land Tamil Eelam would not have come to be if we had treated our Tamil brethren the right way and not treated them as second class citizens and deprived them of their rights.

And now over to you.

Tell me, do you accept that our ancestors originated from India?


2
BimsaraB

Tell me, do you accept that our ancestors originated from India?

Let me exprress my view on this question(based on reading). Sri Lanken tamils are more closely genetically related to the Sinhalese majority. Sinhalese are genetically almost  70% closer to the Tamils & the muslims of the Tamil Nadu. Bengali or north indian identity or the mix to the indigenous Sinhalese population have now got faded away substantially over tousands of years and the south indian relationships have become more prominent.

Tamils are a division of the same indigenous once Sinhalese population, now call themseves tamils. This was resulted by the influence of constant south Indian invasions, adoption of language & culture of the rulers. 

1
sathyajith

Suranee writes

Tell me Agent, how would you like it if your government takes over you bank account/accounts which is your life savings and tells you how much you can withdraw and at the same time keeps a certain percentage of the interest? How about having you pay tax for sending your kids to prestigious schools?

I would love to have these socalled Problems suranee. I think that over 90% of Sri Lankan also would love to have Problems like this.

Don't you think that such comments insult Most of Sri Lankan civilians??

1
Hiranya Malwatta

LOL


Such comments insult the intelligence of Sri Lankans.

0
Suranee

It will only insult those Sri Lankan civilians who approve of such laws and also approves of a government that implements it.

1
sathyajith

"  Tell me, do you accept that our ancestors originated from India?"

No, my own ancestors, known to me, are not Originated from India

And yours? suranee? 



0
Suranee

Now that's amazing that you don't have any ancestors that came from India.

My ancestors and I'm sure alot of other Sri lankan's ancestors did originate from India, and let's not forget Britain, Dutch and Portuguese and even from Arab countries (those who came to Sri lanka as tradesman).

2
israeli.agent

"Now that's amazing...."

??

.Agent.

1
Hiranya Malwatta

There is no cure for "i hate Mahinda Rajapaksa" syndrome. Fortunately for the rest of us Sri Lankans, only a very small percentage of Sri Lankans suffer from it and a further smaller percentage of that try very hard to go around spreading lies.

["how would you like it if your government takes over you bank account/accounts which is your life savings and tells you how much you can withdraw and at the same time keeps a certain percentage of the interest? How about having you pay tax for sending your kids to prestigious schools?"]
["there are some Sri Lankans who do not consider the civilians in the war zone to be "civilians" or Sri lankans" but instead, supporters of the LTTE."]


No, don't bother asking me questions... I cannot be bothered to answer any.

3
BimsaraB

It is true Hiranya, no solution is possible as long as those non citizens and those got very little to do with Sri Lanka (exept for the birth cetificate & the asylum passport) are allowed to do their two cents worth in this country affairs.

 The people undergoing all the hardships in the NFZ including the poor misguided fighters of the  LTTE (the conscripted and brain washed for 20 years), IDP's & the entire nation (terrorised by one maniac and his war mechinery abroad fearing return on a solution) are Sri Lankans.

Tamils in Sri Lanka (not the one's live in Eelam) wants the right to live  with dignity and equality but what the Terrorists are craving for is a homeland & a seprate state for over 70 million tamils all over the world. Their long term plan would be to snatch the control of power of the entire island from the Sinhalese to create the sovereign tamil nation.

This war is supported and financed by a crowed that do not have a pinch of affect of what their own clan is going through in Wanni. Untill the fall of Mullathieve no one was interested in a cease-fire. Why now???

I am not politically inclined to any party. However One thing I can  say is Mahinda Rajapakse would be the only person(in the present day) who could sell a solution acceptable to all communities and to the Mahasanga.  

Tamils,Sinhalese & Muslims you let this go & be doomed forever.

0
Suranee

Mahinda Rajapakse's "solution" will only benefit the Sinhalese extremists.

It's those of us Sri Lankans who value our freedom and our rights that will be "doomed forever" under his dictatorship.

0
BimsaraB

 

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from