NP Rank:
Knife Crime Down but questions over stop and search persist
Knife crime is down in London by 12% compared with last year according to new police figures.
Commander Mark Simmons of the Metropolitan Police said that much of the decrease was down to increasing the number of stop and search actions on the streets of London.
Such searches rose by 386% between 2005 and 2007 and some people are questioning its use on such a regular basis given that most such searches result in not finding knives or in arrests but might serve to alienate youths leading to disenchantment with the authorities.
The Metropolitan police yesterday claimed a limited success in the fight against knife crime, citing a 12% fall in incidents since May, but at the price of long-term resentment over the widespread use of stop-and-search needed to achieve it.
Commander Mark Simmons - who is in charge of the Met's Operation Blunt 2, launched in May to tackle knife crime - told a seminar organised by the Commons home affairs select committee that, while they did not give the whole picture, the statistics showed a significant fall: "We think we are on the right track," he told MPs.
He said it did not detract from the individual tragedies of the 22 teenagers killed this year to say that the number of young victims of knife crime had fallen by 18% since May.
Simmons said the use of stop-and-search powers had been an "absolutely key tactic" for the police, with 150,000 searches since the campaign started in May. He said there had been 5,000 arrests as a result of the these encounters and that 3,200 knives had been recovered. He defended the use of "section 60" searches under which the police do not even need to have "grounds for reasonable suspicion"; he argued that the power had not been used randomly but had been based on intelligence and profiling about the risks at specific locations at specific times of the day.
Collection of knives seized by police. Photograph: Lewis Whyld/PA
The seminar - held in Stockwell, south London - heard leading criminologist Dr Marian Fitzgerald from the University of Kent outline her reservations about the use of section 60 stop-and-search powers, which has been authorised in 10 London boroughs as part of a drive against knife crime.
She said while young people accepted stop-and-search if there were grounds for suspecting a crime, section 60 did not require the police to have any reasonable grounds for suspicion and in 97% of cases produced no result, with no knives found. This was bound to have a long-term impact on the predominantly young black people who found themselves repeatedly being searched.
But the criminologist also questioned whether the Met had the power to use stop-and-search powers in a routine way: "Section 60 [of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994] only allows them to be used in a designated place for 24 hours extending up to 36 hours in exceptional circumstances. I have not heard any explanation from the Met police how they now believe it is possible to use them on an almost permanent basis across 10 London boroughs," she said.
Crowd Power
-
nklajn
London, United Kingdom
Recommendations (37)
-
jjenet
Ilford, Essex, United Kingdom -
Dave Keating
London, United Kingdom 
Anonymous user
-
Blue Crush
Toronto, Canada -
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
rahul
Caracas, Distrito Capital, Venezuela -
gerrypopplestone
London and elsewhere, United Kingdom -
AlanEvans
dessau, Germany







Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (7)
at 02:21 on November 18th, 2008
Marion Fitzgerald makes some good points: she has tons of experience both working at the Home Office and independent orgs. I have a lot of respect for her. But I also think the police have learnt from previous bad experience that there is a way of doing 'stop + search' that does not alienate - being respectful and polite. And they are good at it. I had a recent experience with them involving one of my (chaotic) neighbours and they dealt with him impeccably! And I don't have much time for the police based on earlier experiences!
Also, I don't agree with her about 97% nil result. A three percent result seems to me to justify doing it. Especially when that means 5,000 arrests!
at 23:53 on November 17th, 2008
Interesting story, thanks for posting
at 01:28 on November 18th, 2008
at 02:24 on November 18th, 2008
Sorry: I keep forgeting to add the rcommend sign!
at 02:25 on November 18th, 2008
Sorry: I keep forgeting to add the rcommend sign!
at 02:25 on November 18th, 2008
Sorry: I keep forgeting to add the rcommend sign!
at 06:18 on November 18th, 2008
Thanks for the thoughtful comment Gerry. In a way the police can't win sometimes. They have responded to public requests for a clampdown on youths carrying knives but now are accused of doing too many S&Ss . Yes 5,000 arrests is a lot!