Liberal Media Control In US Even Skews Opinion polls

The new poll results based upon certain percentages of Americans and who their political party affiliation is with was just released. Based upon the results, it appears that both Obama and Mitt Romney own half of the number of votes before considering swing states of which there are ten or more. An undecided percentage of independent voters could be the deciding factor, but there is a discrepancy.

Most polls are portrayed as solicited opinions of individuals in order to sample the mindset of the public, but in recent years that practice has been compromised. Now opinion polls can be used to influence public opinion rather than test it. Many times a particular issue that is broadly accepted or denied by one particular party is polled with a much smaller percentage of voters who do not support the results that the pollster is trying to glean from his survey. Loading the polling audience with a disparity in parties will falsely represent the final results of a poll that was intended to drive public opinion as opposed to merely sampling it. More often than not the results of the poll are announced conveniently without showing what percentage of the audience questioned was Democrat, Republican, or independent. This overlooked aspect can grossly affect the outcome in a disingenuous result. Democrats have specialized in this form of misrepresentation.

Showing Romney and Obama holding around 36% of the vote each prior to evaluating swing state outcomes seems like an honest result until one considers that there were 9% or nine points less Republican supporters polled than Democrats in the survey. This discrepancy would definitely skew the results and reflect, once again the misleading figure that liberal pollsters agenda want to reflect. The truth is that as Obama’s continued economic failure tellingly goes unsolved while the days drag until the election, the number will inevitably begin to reflect the growing disenchantment with the Democratic White House’s inept policies.

In the coming election there will be negative attacks, claims that stretch credibility, and outright lies as we have seen in many of Obama’s speeches. It will be up to the American public to break away from their preoccupations, begin evaluating the issues more closely, and resist the automatic press corps advantage given to the President, who will get much more positive air time than he either pays for or deserves.

Organizations like Politico and MSNBC can be relied upon to continually show misleading and intentionally biased results. ABC, CBS, NBC, all major networks will be constantly giving President Obama the advantage in commentary and projected outcomes while only Fox News will evaluate more objectively even though they have come under fire by the left for their coverage. One must ask what Democrats and liberals want, it sure isn’t fair representation when a much larger percentage of media coverage will be biased in Obama’s favor despite his reprehensible job on the economy, draconian legislation, and foreign policy. This while only Fox news stands as the opposing viewpoint among the press corps.

It would seem that with such an advantage in the American propaganda mill that liberals would be satisfied with that advantage, but they are not as Fox in under continued attack by the pundits as well as the President. Why, you might ask? Because the truth is a compelling commodity. It resists spin, bias, and distraction despite best efforts of those who do not want to be exposed. The Democrats know that the failure of their policies, their fascist grab for power in the US with such legislation as NDAA S.1867 and HR 347 represent more than political preference, they represent a despicable power grab that parallels the most brutal regimes in history. Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s right hand man on media manipulation would be proud of what Democrats and the US media have conspired to do here in the embattled United States.