NP Rank:
The lies of American Right
1. The Right believes that "money talks, bull**it walks" and sees money as the supreme American value and the measure of all things, including strength, success, intelligence and integrity. And now it is whining about Jews or "New World Order" super-rich supposedly having more money than do they. Which means that either their first claim - the claim that they've used to destroy art, science, education, academia, media, humanitarianism, and all good causes taken up in the West - is wrong, and for that reason is their central ideology; or that their talk about Jewish bankers and "New World Order" is nothing but scapegoating. Since the right-wing Bush regime had America for eight years and made it exactly the way that the Right wanted it, both are the case.
2. The Right sees emotion as an inferior function and those possessing any kind of feeling as weak. And now it is playing on everyone's feeling, as all those liberal meanies are supposedly not being nice to the Right's way of life, when the Right has wiped out thousands of other ways of life and maliciously sabotaged every way other than theirs that occasioned in America. Which means that either their first claim - the claim that they've used to practice extreme violence and cruelty to people and destroy all causes that could be seen as having come from "emotion" - is false, and for that reason is their central ideology; or that their playing on people's feelings is nothing but shameless manipulation by those contemptuous of everything emotional - contemptuous likewise of the people whom they lure to their side through this manipulation of their feelings. Once again, both are the case.
3. The Right claims its way to be the most successful way ever invented. And now it is howling about "elites" that have committed the outrageous sin of being more successful than them. Which means that either their first claim - the claim that they've used to destroy every other way of life that existed on Earth or that attempted to come into being in places in which they were operating - is false, and for that reason is their central ideology; or that their elite talk is nothing but conmanship and scapegoating for their own failures. Since they had America for the last decade, once again both are the case.
4. The Right proclaims that it has superior culture. And yet it claims those who actually care about or contribute to culture to be elitists, snobs, and posers, and sees culture as luxury of the elites. Which means that either their first claim - the claim that they've used to destroy creativity, intellect and beauty in their youth and vastly impoverish America culturally - are false, and for that reason is their central ideology; or that their abuse of culture and its contributors is vast hypocrisy and wrongdoing. Once again, both are the case.
5. The Right claims to have as its values "responsibility," "family values," and "American patriotism." And yet it put their children and their country $10 trillion in the hole, aggressively denied global warming, claimed anyone who knew to the contrary to be a "greenie" or "wacko," and is hoping for a violent destruction of the world and all its inhabitants before the children being born now have learned how to read. Which means that either their first claim - the claim that they've used to slander and demonize all in America who aren't them - is a lie, and so is their central ideology; or that they are a bunch of liars and hypocrites. Once again, both are the case.
6. The Right claims its way of life to be based in logic and realism. And yet it is contemptuous of fact and reality, to the point of aggressively denying vast bulk of scientific fact, from age of Earth and size of the universe to global warming. Which means that either their first claim - the claim that they've used to destroy every culture that practiced different forms of cognition from theirs, and subject to horrible abuse the people in their own culture who likewise practiced other cognition - is wrong, and for that reason is their central ideology; or they are conmen and liars. Once again, both are the case.
7. The Right claims that anyone to whom bad things have been done is a weak person playing victim and should put up and shut up. And yet they are continuously playing victim to "liberal media," "politically correct academia," Jewish bankers and New World Order conspiracies. Which means that either their first claim - the claim that they've used to inflict egregious amounts of hideousness and abuse on people inside and outside America and deny help where it was needed - is wrong, and for that reason is their central ideology; or that their victim-playing is a racket. Once again, both are the case.
8. The Right claims that social justice and humanitarianism is weakness and stupidity, that every country deserves its government, and that success is the measure of righteousness, intelligence and strength. And yet it shouts about the "communists" in the government and the "cruel" Jews and the international "elites" who are more successful than they are. Which means that either their first claim - the claim that they've used to destroy liberalism and humanitarianism - is false, and for that reason is their central ideology; or that their howling about these people is nothing but idiocy and hypocrisy on the part of people who have committed, and continue to commit, far greater wrongs than any that can be ascribed to these. Once again, both are the case.
9. The Right claims to be people of God who live by Christian values. And yet they base their whole way of life on destructive myopic rapacity and see anyone who actually applies Christian values as a commie. Which means that either their first claim - the claim that they've used to gut primary education, defund academia, and discredit scientific fact resulting in current catastrophe - is a lie, and so is their central ideology; or that their way of life is in contradiction to their stated values. Once again, both are the case.
10. The Right claims to be operating in support of American Constitution. And yet they deny people the central tenet of Constitution - meaningful freedom, meaning first and foremost freedom not to be them - and every lifestyle and belief that people developed that is not theirs. Which means that either their first claim - the claim that they've used to demonize and destroy all who aren't them and force everyone into being their puppets - is a lie, and so is their central ideology; or that they are anti-Constitutional usurpers and tyrants who want to destroy everyone in America who isn't them, oppress everyone else, and then proclaim America to be a free country. Once again, both are the case.
NowPublic on Facebook
Most Recommended Comment
Recommendations (12)
-
Rory Cripps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States
-
Karen Hatter
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States -
YankeeJim
Arlington, Virginia, United States -
Grace H
Austin, Texas, United States -
Spydermonkey
huntsville, Alabama, United States -
Susan Marie Kovalinsky
Ledgewood, New Jersey, United States


Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (25)
at 06:14 on April 29th, 2010
I'm sure that you're sincere here in your diatribe against the American right, but is there anything at all about the American left that you disagree with? Do you honestly believe that the American left has all the answers and that Americans would be a freer people if the entire government (federal, state, and local) consisted of nothing but left-wing ideologues?
I've got to recommend this story simply because of its instructive nature and what it reveals about the leftist mindset. Thanks for sharing . . . .
at 17:12 on April 29th, 2010
Yes Rory, there are things that American Left is conflicted about, and there were that were done by American Left that were wrong - the worst one of these having been political correctness, which I vocally opposed from the start. But given the aggressiveness of American Right in claiming that it is right in every way and that everything that comes from the Left is a menace, it is rightful that they be met at their level and with their own type of uncompromising stridency - which kind of uncompromising stridency they equate with righteousness and strength even as they equate civilized discourse with weakness. Extremes create the middle, and when the Right shouts and the Left puts up and shuts up guess who gets away with their outrageous claims. I've always believed in meeting things at their level instead of throwing good energy after the bad - if you try to be above the fray you get accused of being out of touch; if you are nice you are accused of insincerity; if you are compromising you get accused of weakness. Given the extreme rhetoric and deceptiveness of the American Right, it is for public benefit and for America's benefit that they be met at their level, in just the kind of strident terms that they themselves use.
at 06:49 on April 29th, 2010
"And yet they are continuously playing victim to liberal media ... " There is no liberal media! There is no liberal media! There is no liberal media! A number of so-called "liberal" media venues have been put forward - and have been turned into pop-star idol "edutainment" channels. Meanwhile, the extreme right blasts forth (with no half naked pop starlet distractions to get in the way) on Fox affiliates. These "liberal" venues are in fact owned by giant defense contractors -- General Electric and Westinghouse (fighter aircraft and tanks, respectively). So now we are to believe that the lefties own Westinghouse and GE? I think not. There is no liberal media!
at 07:07 on April 29th, 2010
Anonymously Given (not verified): Of course there's a liberal media just like there's a conservative media! JEEZ! Fox is conservative and MSNBC (the organization that turns black men into white men) is liberal. So what? To make the claim that Fox is right wing and biased and every other news organization is "fair and balanced" is absurd and has no basis in fact.
The merchant (i.e. G.E., Westinghouse, etc.) has no country. Those corporations couldn't care any less what type of crap their news organizations spew as long as they get ratings and bring in the bucks . . . .
at 07:19 on April 29th, 2010
"Those corporations couldn't care any less what type of crap ... " Well, Mr. Cripps, I would like you to consider the idea that no company will kick out from under themselves the ideology that drives their corporate structure and that provides their *real* (100's of $Billions) revenue. The scantily clad pop-icon revenue is chicken feed for them in comparison to the defense contracts.
at 07:49 on April 29th, 2010
Anonymously Given (not verified): I get it now! The management's agenda at MSNBC, CNN, et al. is to only present news that serves as a propaganda vehicle for the maintenance of the military industrial complex! And as we all know the MIC is the means by which America subjects freedom loving people throughout the world and carries out its genocidal policies against people of color.
BTW: Does Chris Matthews know that he's simply a useful idiot for the military industrial complex?
at 08:02 on April 29th, 2010
Of course he does.
at 08:12 on April 29th, 2010
My opinion is that some of the loudest "liberals" in Congress are, similarly, useful idiots for the same group of people!
at 07:22 on April 29th, 2010
Indeed Rory. It is impossible for anything to be unbiased. Its is an entirely absurd notino that is a contradiction of and proven a fallacy buy the subjectivity of the very nature life.
at 06:52 on April 29th, 2010
"The Right claims to be operating in support of American Constitution. And yet they deny people the central tenet of Constitution - meaningful freedom, meaning first and foremost freedom not to be them." Exactly.
at 07:05 on April 29th, 2010
"And yet they are continuously playing victim to liberal media ... " There is no liberal media! There is no liberal media! There is no liberal media! A number of so-called "liberal" media venues have been put forward - and have been turned into pop-star idol "edutainment" channels. Meanwhile, the extreme right blasts forth (with no half naked pop starlet distractions to get in the way) on Fox affiliates. The so-called "liberal" venues are in fact owned by giant defense contractors -- General Electric and Westinghouse's division offshoot, Northrup Grumman (fighter aircraft and tanks, respectively). So now the lefties own Westinghouse and GE? The lefties own the major players in the Military Industrial Complex!?! I think not. Please change your habits and drink only bottled water ... get off of the sodium fluoride!
at 07:13 on April 29th, 2010
I have to agree with Rory (again gasp *grin*) you do a great job of pointing out the rights hypocrisy
But then again, all extreme ideologies tend to have some level of hypocrisy, that is the big danger I see in any "extremism"
at 08:14 on April 29th, 2010
Spydermonkey: Don't choke! JEEZ! I'd feel terrible if you did that on account of something that I said. Quite frankly, I could rip at least half of what the author said about the right here apart and point out just as many inconsistencies and hypocrisies on the part of the left.
The Jewish conspiracy thing (ZOG--Zionist Occupation Government) that supposedly is a common belief of the right would be pretty hard for neocons (many of whom are Jewish) to swallow. The same thing goes for the New World Order belief.
The author is taking a tiny subset of the American right--the far out fringe--who absolutely despise the Republican party and is lumping them in with all of those who happen to be right of center. Rush Limbaugh doesn't even believe in those theories! It's like labeling anyone that's left of center or that takes a liberal view an out and out communist. Obama supporters went ballistic when those in the Tea Party were calling Obama a Nazi and a socialist. The author here is essentially doing the same thing but only using different terminology to describe those that don't march in lock-step with leftist ideology.
at 17:58 on April 29th, 2010
"The author here is essentially doing the same thing but only using different terminology to describe those that don't march in lock-step with leftist ideology. " Um, no, I am talking about the right-wingers. Once again, given the stridency and the aggressiveness with which right-wingers attack everyone who is not a right-winger, it is rightful that they be met at their level.
at 08:46 on April 29th, 2010
Wow. What a target rich environment. I don't have the hours it takes to debate this kind of crazy, (I have a job, after all) but just to address a couple of the fatties:Point 3. I believe the popular turn-of-phrase among the Right is: "Capitalism is the worst form of government, with the possible exception of all the other forms of government." It's messy. It's imperfect. There are winners and there are losers, but everyone gets to "winner" or "loser" as the product of the decisions they make. And if they get tired of being a loser, they have a clear path to being a winner if they'll work for it.Point 4. No. The Right merely has the audacity to claim that there IS a DOMINANT CULTURE. Not a White culture. Not a Male culture. Just a dominant culture. We acknowledge that every other country is entitled to a dominant culture but the USA. We wouldn't dream of going to France and bitching about the way their culture works and demanding changes. We'd know we had to assimilate to their dominant culture. But somehow when someone from an alien culture comes here, we contort and distort our country's culture to suit them.Point 5. Dude. Srsly. Xanax. Maybe Lithium.
at 18:07 on April 29th, 2010
It is apparent that you have not read before responding. Here are the points quoted:
3. The Right claims its way to be the most successful way ever invented. And now it is howling about "elites" that have committed the outrageous sin of being more successful than them. Which means that either their first claim - the claim that they've used to destroy every other way of life that existed on Earth or that attempted to come into being in places in which they were operating - is false, and for that reason is their central ideology; or that their elite talk is nothing but conmanship and scapegoating for their own failures. Since they had America for the last decade, once again both are the case.
4. The Right proclaims that it has superior culture. And yet it claims those who actually care about or contribute to culture to be elitists, snobs, and posers, and sees culture as luxury of the elites. Which means that either their first claim - the claim that they've used to destroy creativity, intellect and beauty in their youth and vastly impoverish America culturally - are false, and for that reason is their central ideology; or that their abuse of culture and its contributors is vast hypocrisy and wrongdoing. Once again, both are the case.
5. The Right claims to have as its values "responsibility," "family values," and "American patriotism." And yet it put their children and their country $10 trillion in the hole, aggressively denied global warming, claimed anyone who knew to the contrary to be a "greenie" or "wacko," and is hoping for a violent destruction of the world and all its inhabitants before the children being born now have learned how to read. Which means that either their first claim - the claim that they've used to slander and demonize all in America who aren't them - is a lie, and so is their central ideology; or that they are a bunch of liars and hypocrites. Once again, both are the case.
at 18:20 on April 29th, 2010
"The Right merely has the audacity to claim that there IS a DOMINANT CULTURE. Not a White culture. Not a Male culture. Just a dominant culture."
Which is totally wrong thing to believe, as anyone knows who has actually travelled around America. South is different from Midwest, which is different from Northeast, which is different from Pacific Coast, which is different from the Rockies. In a single metropolitan area we find all kinds of different cultures as well.
" We acknowledge that every other country is entitled to a dominant culture but the USA. "
In a free country, people create their own cultures or go to ones that are appropriate for them. Claiming that there is a dominant culture and using that claim to persecute other cultures prevents people from doing that, which means that doing so suppresses liberty, which means that doing so is anti-American.
" We wouldn't dream of going to France and bitching about the way their culture works and demanding changes. "
Oh, but you do.
"But somehow when someone from an alien culture comes here, we contort and distort our country's culture to suit them."
Your ancestors came from an alien culture. They were influential in shaping American culture, so do people coming in to America now have the right to be.
at 14:45 on April 29th, 2010
Entertaining all.
at 17:35 on April 29th, 2010
I find it somewhat disheartening that Ishambat has overlooked the wealthy Oprah Winfrey and other Hollywood types, George Soros' wealth, and the wealth of Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, the Kennedys that remain, John Jay Rockefeller and Herb Kohl just to mention a very small few. Unless I am mistaken, these people are all Democrats and liberals and quite happy with their wealth obtained through their daily practice of capitalism. Your rant seems to be full of anger and misinformation.
at 18:04 on April 29th, 2010
I was writing about how right-wingers start with "money talks, bulls**t walks" and end with New World Order conspiracy theories about people who are supposedly wealthier than they are and who for that reason must be evil. Capitalism, as you say, has both liberal and conservative contributors, and its greatest contributor in recent decades has been the largely Democratic computer industry. So first the right-wingers claim that capitalism is theirs and the only way; and then when a critical mass of Democrats get wealthy suddenly the world is evil and a satanic global conspiracy of the leftist super-rich is running the world. So which one is it then? It can't be both at once.
at 07:16 on May 4th, 2010
It's completely ridiculous to imply that claims of a NWO conspiracy are directed at Democrat party aligned computer engineers. I mean, really, lay off the crack before you post.
The belief set behind NWO conspiracy really is centered on the Rockefellers and goes back to the fifties, becoming more popular by the late sixties and early seventies. It has long been held that Rockefeller desired to promote a world government under the auspices of world peace, and seek to reduce national sovereignty facilitating his own crony capitalism, yet implement a socialist solution for the masses which would limit their ability for free enterprise whch threatened the status quo.
Statements and actions by Rockefeller and his CFR and trilateral group think tanks give so called conspiracy theorists a solid reason to look into it.
at 06:19 on May 5th, 2010
LaRouch asserts that the world is run by some sinister group of bankers in London. A movie called Zeitgeist also asserts that the world is run by bankers. Islamists claim that the world is run by Freemasons allied with the Jews, which claim the neo-Nazis support. Then there's the Military Industrial Complex, which more respectable people such as Eisenhower talked about.
If NWO was championed by Rockefeller, then there is nothing new about it; it is over a century and a half old. Which means that the people talking about it now are a century and a half late. The people who talk about NWO aren't talking about Rockefeller; they talk a lot more about IMF, World Bank, and of course the American liberals. Meanwhile the phrase was first used in political context by Republican President Bush Sr. to describe a world run by republican values ("rule of the law rather than the law of the jungle" in his words). And the people who use these terms are the same people who voted for Bush Jr., whose policies were very much of the corporate state character - which, from your description, is the same character as is ascribed to Rockefeller's view for the world.
at 07:15 on May 16th, 2010
If we agree on anything it's probably that this NWO label is inaccurate because it's the same greedy crooked people who have always had their hand in the till.
I voted for Bush in 2004 merely because I saw Kerry as offering nothing but blame on Bush for things he was responsible for as well, and being a military veteran I know his performance after he returned home in the 70's would not go well for people we have in Iraq if repeated.
George W. Bush is a loser. John Kerry is a loser. Neither would run the country alone. Given the choice I chose President Cheney simply because it made no sense to go to all that trouble invading Iraq and leave before we finished.
I think what you fail to understand about suspicions of Rockefeller and his banking cabal is they seek to implement an ultracapitalist world model for themselves and the other .1% who are in their circles, control crooked government officials for their own needs, and preside over a world atmosphere of contented socialism under the auspices of freedom and democracy but only as much as they could control.
Nearly every cabinet member of Jimmy Carter's Presidency was a member of Rockefeller's Trilateral commission, and most of Reagan's was too. Bush Sr. was a member of Rockefeller's Council on Foreign Relations, as was Clinton, and the bulk of his staff as well. Every CIA head for decades has been a member of CFR.
In fact,
In his book Radical Priorities, Noam Chomsky said this:
β Perhaps the most striking feature of the new Administration is the role played in it by the Trilateral Commission. The mass media had little to say about this matter during the Presidential campaign -- in fact, the connection of the Carter group to the Commission was recently selected as "the best censored news story of 1976" -- and it has not received the attention that it might have since the Administration took office. All of the top positions in the government -- the office of President, Vice-President, Secretary of State, Defense and Treasury -- are held by members of the Trilateral Commission, and the National Security Advisor was its director. Many lesser officials also came from this group. It is rare for such an easily identified private group to play such a prominent role in an American Administration. β
βThe Carter Administration: Myth and Reality, Excerpted from Radical Priorities, 1981 Noam Chomsky
And their grip on the power of the world has only solidified since.
I would offer if you truly cared about changing many of the things you complain about you should spend less of your energy getting all worked up about some generalized but really nonexistent foe you've manufactured in your mind called "the right" and nonsensically blame for all the world's ills. There are plenty of Republicans that don't fit the suit you are sewing, and plenty of independents who don't fit either party but share ideals of each. In the end the only intelligent people on the political stump are those who think for themselves on individual issues, and anyone declaring himself staunchly Left or Right or Democrat or Republican is almost always going to be talking out their ass a good percentage of the time.
at 05:22 on April 30th, 2010
The hypocrisy of the "ruling class" right wing fascists -- don't they present such a kindergarten level facade? Why people cannot see through this stuff immediately is a serious mystery to me ... sodium fluoride maybe ....
at 05:29 on April 30th, 2010
It's the water. "Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual's power to resist domination by slowly poisoning and narcotising a certain area of the brain, and will thus make him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him." - - this quote is ostensibly attributable to a Mr. Harley Dickinson - a one time member of the Australian legislature. Evidently - not all politicians are bad. See: www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/chapter_02.htm