NP Rank:
Lifer Politicians
I heard one politician from California remark that after term limits force her from office she has designs on becoming ambassador to Cuba. This statement provides substance for analysis: 1) a politician sees politics as a life-long never ending occupation and 2) term limits won’t terminate their lust for a government salary. That is not the way I think it should be.
I think Americans want representatives who come to office with competence and subject matter expertise to address the needs of the people. The system is wholly inadequate as to guiding the understanding about what is needed from representatives. What the Constitutional framers had in mind, and what I suggest, is best for Americans today, is to select representatives who have backgrounds and experiences paralleling the American people – diverse occupations, knowledge about the issues and needs, especially technical. What we have today is more at “lifer politicians.”
So, when I read reports about Charlie Rangel, a decorated American war hero and lawyer turned lifer politician, and I see how he is bent toward self-serving corruption in the end, this is an example of what we don’t need.
Furthermore, as an African American serving Harlem, his constituents must ask, “Are we better off now from Charlie’s representation than before?” Only they can answer that.
Having lived in Cleveland and Oakland California, I can answer that the communities were not well served by now famous African American leaders. Business moved away, and even government employment from military installations and such moved away leaving more unemployed and additional deterioration.
Why? It is not that leaders were African American; it is because they approached their public duty as lifer politicians akin to permanent welfare recipients.
“Ethics probes of Rangel, Waters cause tension on Capitol Hill
By James Oliphant and Richard Simon
Monday, August 2, 2010
The prospect of two long-serving, iconic black lawmakers in the House enduring unprecedented public ethics trials could add to the growing tension between black members of Congress and Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill and in the Obama administration.
Congressional sources confirmed late Friday that Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) will face an ethics proceeding this year that is probably related to allegations that she sought to help a bank with ties to her husband receive federal bailout funds.
The House trial could come on the heels of the high-profile trial of Rep. Charles B. Rangel, the venerable Democrat from New York who is accused of 13 violations of House ethics rules. Like Rangel, Waters chose not to seek a settlement with House ethics investigators that would have involved some admission of wrongdoing.
Between them, Rangel, 80, and Waters, 71, have served in the House for six decades and are leading members of the Congressional Black Caucus. The caucus has long complained that the House ethics process disproportionately targets blacks in the chamber.”





Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (5)
at 06:07 on August 2nd, 2010
There plenty of white politicians who fit the profile as lifer politicians as well. The system that favors seniority is uneven because some states have term limits and others do not.
at 08:20 on August 2nd, 2010
Apart from being the last resort of a scoundrel,politics is opiate for the same category of scoundrels.I have observed that life span of a poltician is much longer than that of a gentleman.I could not succeed in fathoming the reasons of a politician's extrordinary life span.But it is a constant source of irritation to me;and to you also,I guess so.
at 11:15 on August 2nd, 2010
not usual to enter career politics for short term just like no one else takes career for short term. successful politician is one who can keep getting elected. that the goal.
at 18:14 on August 3rd, 2010
I always appreciate your responses, though I do not always agree. The paradigm of perpetual reelection is absolutely wrong IMO. There should be term limits for all.
at 07:11 on August 4th, 2010
Add Maxine Waters to the list of probable ethics violators.