NP Rank:
Lindsay warns of "mass resignations" if DADT policy is repealed
Retired Army General, James L Lindsay, who is leading the campaign against allowing gays to serve openly in the military warns of "mass resignations" if Section 654 of US Code Title 10, the section that bans gays and lesbians from serving openly in the military, is repealed.
Writing in the Concord Monitor, James L Lindsay argued that "grave harm" would be caused to the US defence service if the law were to be changed.
Mr Lindsay cited a survey by the Military Times which suggested ten per cent of subscribers said they would not re-enlist if the gay ban was repealed and 14 percent said they would consider leaving.
He estimates that even if the lesser number were to leave, the military would lose 228,600 service members.
Mr Lindsay wrote: "We don't need a study commission to know that tensions are inevitable in conditions offering little or no privacy, increasing the stress of daily military life.
"'Zero tolerance' of dissent would become official intolerance of anyone who disagrees with this policy, forcing additional thousands to leave the service by denying them promotions or punishing them in other ways.
"Many more will be dissuaded from ever enlisting. There is no compelling national security reason for running these risks to our armed forces."
He concluded: "Everyone can serve America in some way, but there is no constitutional right to serve in the military."
Last month, a letter written by Mr Lindsay and another retired general, Carl Stiner, urging President Barack Obama to preserve the gay ban was leaked to the Palm Center, a research institute at the University of California.
In it, they wrote: "We believe that imposing this burden on our men and women in uniform would undermine recruiting and retention, impact leadership at all echelons, have adverse effects on the willingness of parents who lend their sons and daughters to military service, and eventually break the All-Volunteer Force."
In other news, U.S. Defence Secretary Robert Gates has indicated that repealing the Don't Ask, Don't Tell (DADT) policy could take years, or might not happen at all. Speaking at the U.S. Army War College on Thursday, Gates was said to have urged a cautious approach on the issue.
"“If we do it, it’s important that we do it right, and very carefully.’’
When asked by an officer about the policy, he said it was a "complex and difficult problem".
Gates also cited the example of racial integration in the 1940s, saying that it took five years for be completed.
He said that gauging opinion on the issue was a particular problem: “To get people’s real feelings about it, you have to have almost a one-on-one private conversation.
“I think it’s very difficult for people to speak in front of their peers about this issue.’’
Gates reiterated President Barack Obama's support for changing the law, saying: "The president has made it clear where he wants to go."
A comprehensive 2008 review of the policy found "there is no evidence showing that openly gay service would harm the military, and a great deal of evidence showing it would not."
Crowd Power
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States
Recommendations (22)
-
Uwe Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan 
Anonymous users (2)
-
fromama
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke
Redwater, Alberta, Canada -
duo
Stone Mountain, Georgia, United States -
Suranee
Ratnapura, Sri Lanka




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (3)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpokeat 03:19 on April 18th, 2009
The policy was changed in the Canadian Forces in the 90s. The issue of harm to the military is hogwash. Gays have served their countries, in the closet, since the beginning of time. Although there might be open objections to a policy change, my question is where is a sitting on the fence policy of Don.t ask don.t tell, make the situation any better. The old generals need to wake up and join the 21st century. Soldiers joining the military now are a lot more tolerant than they give them credit for. Canada.s policy is proof of this. I heard all the arguments when this policy was first implemented, but essentially soldiers did not leave in droves as forecasted by these generals. These are all the same arguments that were directed against women in the 70s, and again in the late 80s when the opposition agains women in combat arms MOSs was proposed. The world moves on. Get with the program.
at 06:21 on April 18th, 2009
I'm not sure why people take this guy so seriously. He doesn't know what he is talking about. There are plenty of armed services across the world that accept gays and lesbians as equals. I'm not sure it makes much difference between DADT and 'out' people! After, it is still a question of gays being in the armed services along with straights! Why do the US angst about this so much. Roberet Gates should just get on and do it!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpokeat 08:10 on April 18th, 2009
The difference between DADT and out is, that they still have to hide in the closet. It.s just that they won.t get asked about their sexual orientation. The angst is silly. I.m not gay and I don.t understand why these generals feel so threatened. I know who I am. Maybe these guys aren.t sure of their own masculinity.
at 05:37 on April 19th, 2009
Yeah, Esta. Good on you! The irony is that the military very occasionally have to snuggle up to each other when they are sleeping out in the rough and have little means of keeping warm. What some people don't seem to realise that physical intimacy need not be at all connected with sexual intimacy! It takes two to tango! Anything else is called rape! I doubt very much whether gays in the armed services are interested in raping heterosexual male colleagues!
at 18:00 on April 19th, 2009
Thanks to everyone who read, commented on, and/or recommended this story!