NP Rank:
'Little Boy' Reminds the World of Unnecessary Atrocities
Today Hiroshima is mourning the 64th anniversary of the atomic bombing of the city by United States forces during World War II.
Nuclear weapon Little Boy's blinding blast and its infamous mushroom cloud doomed the lives of nearly 140,000 people, including women, children and many elderly on August 6, 1945.
Three days after that, a second bomb was dropped in the southern port city of Nagasaki, killing over 70,000 japanese civilians. This led to the definitive surrender of Japan.
The bombs were supposedly dropped on japanese soil as a response on a japanese attack on the United States' naval base at Pearl Harbor (Hawaii), which had taken place on December 7, 1941. The japanese attack killed some 2,500 people and wounded over a thousand. Many theories have since surfaced regarding the previous knowledge the Roosevelt administration might have had of the attack.
Regardless of this, the US attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki marked the end of World War II, but also the start of the Atomic Age.
64 years later, 50,000 people, including atom bomb survivors (referred to as hibakusha), politicians, the United Nations and representatives from 59 countries, gathered at the A-bomb Dome, which is the remains of a hall badly burned by the bomb's intense heat, to remember the tragedy but also to call for the abolition of nuclear weapons worldwide.
Hiroshima Mayor Tadatoshi Akiba delivered a peace declaration, calling for the abolition of nuclear weapons by 2020.
"The hibakusha still suffer a hell that continues," said Akiba.
"The Japanese government should support hibakusha, including those who were victims of black rain and those who live overseas," he said.
It was reported Wednesday that the Japanese government aims to come to an agreement with all atomic bomb survivors who have sued the government for financial support to help them pay medical bills for illnesses related to the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
At exactly 8:15am (the moment the bomb was dropped in 1945) everyone at the memorial ceremony prayed silently for the japanese victims, and for all those who have developed radiation exposure-related diseases.
Prime Minister Taro Aso, also present at the ceremony, said Japan will maintain its three non-nuclear pledges of not possessing, not producing and not allowing nuclear weapons. However, he doubts that the goal of a world free of nuclear weapons is realistic: "It might be possible... if they were abolished suddenly, on one day in one go (...) but under normal circumstances it is unimaginable."
Crowd Power
-
Arbol
San José, Costa Rica
Recommendations (48)
-
everchanging
Phoenix, Arizona, United States -
Scott Wu
Vancouver, Canada -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States
-
albertacowpoke
Canada -
Karen Hatter
All Locations, Everywhere, United States -
sivakaran
Toronto, Canada -
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan


















Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (23)
at 10:16 on August 6th, 2009
It was simply mass murder and a crime of war.
The US still needs to be tried for this in an International court. In the same manner as we tried all the Japanese and German War criminals before.
Pearl Harbour was a Military base where as Hiroshima and Nagasaki where Civilian Cities.
at 12:39 on August 6th, 2009
I agree. And i bet if we come up with the oh-no-you-can't-say-that-word GENOCIDE (I still remember Rwanda), right-wing US nationalists will jump off the couch and play the Pearl Harbor card.
This was the single most monstrous and cruel experiment on "forced peace", and I do hope someday those responsible are justly tried in an international court for crimes against humanity.
at 10:26 on August 6th, 2009
Yes humanity has no need or use for these types of weapons either nuclear or hydrogen in any form or type of as a weapon except to kill other human beings. Making it only sensible to disassemble those weapons already made and making them harmless for future generations. While the technology from the creation of the atom bomb has developed for other less deadly uses it does have benefit humanity like medical and energy among other uses.
While Hiroshima and the event in Nagasaki that followed are truly sad and need to be reminders of our human history of war - We as citizen of humanity should also be thankful that these weapons have not been used since this time in any form outside of testing.
at 13:32 on August 6th, 2009
A friend of mine, head of the history dept at Berkeley High, worked with MLK in the Civil Rights movement, told me that he would have dropped the bomb.
His reasoning and mine coincide.
Interesting how many lives it actually saved. Interesting how a second bomb had to be dropped before the unconditional surrender was declared by the Japanese.
The atrocities of the Japanese include everything that happened in Korea, Manchuria, the rest of China, and the Philippines, with millions killed.The bomb was in response to that and not Pearl Harbor.
25,000 US marines were killed in one day in the fighting in Okinawa, and that was seen as just what the invasion of the mainland would bring about as a daily toll, going on for months.
And the elite of the Japanese wanted to surrender but protect the emperor from prosecution, even though he was totally involved with the war effort.
Interesting as well that many who condemn this action never condemn any of the iconic figures of the pantheon of Marxist-Leninist criminality with its 100 million dead.
The bombing of Dresden did nothing to shorten the war, but the atomic bombing of Japan ended the war and quickly, saving millions of American, British, Russian, and even Japanese from dying of the sick warrior culture that would not permit surrender.
This attempt to make us feel guilty or ashamed simply does not work. It has actually come to be boring to me over the decades of constant refrain.
The Japanese, to this day, do not teach their school children what the Japanese did in WWII. And, we did not prosecute all involved in the atrocities.
Most conspicuously, the emperor was never put on trial, though he was as guilty as anyone in the Japanese high command.
at 14:52 on August 6th, 2009
Ok, congrats to that friend of yours so willing to free the world.
"Interesting how many lives it actually saved." I still don't understand how these "estimations on lives saved" came to be. Please show me the formula. I wouldn't be surprised if you came up with new "estimations" to justify the Iraq war.
"25,000 US marines were killed in one day in the fighting in Okinawa". You said it. MARINES. Not school children and elderly people riding bicycles.
"The atrocities of the Japanese include everything that happened in Korea, Manchuria, the rest of China, and the Philippines, with millions killed.The bomb was in response to that and not Pearl Harbor." I (guess I) understand your end-justifies-the-means policy and your 'Captain America' point of view, but I STRONGLY doubt the US were defending China and the Philippines. I wonder what you would be saying now if the 9/11 attack was carried out with WMD instead of planes. Whatever the japanese (soldiers) did in China, and specially the Nanking massacre ARE war crimes, I'm not denying it. Blame those crimes on Hideki Tojo and the Supreme War Council. But applauding the use of experimental atomic bombs on civilians...?
"The bombing of Dresden did nothing to shorten the war, but the atomic bombing of Japan ended the war and quickly, saving millions of American, British, Russian, and even Japanese from dying of the sick warrior culture that would not permit surrender." And how many germans have died or suffered severe burns or developed cruel diseases from exposure to the Dresden bombs? Right. They weren't nuclear weapons. The US first made sure no one else had them, 'cause, to date, they're still scared of them (Iran, *cough*).
Admiral William D. Leahy, Chief of Staff throughout the war, regretted the Hiroshima bombings, calling them "barbarous" and of "no material assistance" in the war against Japan. He admitted the japanese were "ALREADY DEFEATED and READY TO SURRENDER." "Wars cannot be won by destroying women and children."
Discussing whether this genocide was morally justified or not should not be "boring", but I guess that deaths are just casualties of war to you and bombs are fun.
at 23:38 on August 6th, 2009
Roy, I am sorry, but your rezoning and arguments are flawed and no different then those used by Neo Nazi to justify or excuse the Holocaust, or by Israel to justify bombing Civilian in Gaza and occupying Palestinian Land for over 60 years.
Similar arguments are used by China to justify the crack down on Tibet and by Iran to justify the trial on members of the Green movement.
It is Insulting and disgraceful to use such a rhetoric, especially when one knows the context and history behind them.
You argument is no different then that used by a Man beating his Wife or Raping a Woman, "It was her fault and she asked for it..."
Genocide and Mass Murder are inexcusable and can not ever be justified nor defended or tolerated. Regardless of who commits them!
Those victims of the Atom Bombs the US dropped on Japan still demand justice and for those responsible to be tried and exonerated.
This crime the US has committed, is no different then any other crime of War, Mass Murder and Genocide committed by any Human or Nation.
The US still have to be tried for the Carpet Bombing of Japan and Germany as well as the Mass Murder they committed in Vietnam ... The Victims deserve Justice, no matter who they are and no matter who committed the Crime.
Justice has to prevail!
at 13:34 on August 6th, 2009
THE HUFFINGTON POST??
That source of objectivity? No one knew why the Japanese had not already surrendered and all that the Allies could think was that this was part of the Japanese warrior code, and that they, in fact, would not surrender, just as their ally Hitler did not surrender.
at 14:10 on August 6th, 2009
Once that Bushido code sinks in, there's no going back! I know a little about it . . . .
at 13:45 on August 6th, 2009
No, the conversations about marxists and the left are extremely relevant. It is all about the resentment that many feel because their countries are relatively weak compared to the US.
If you have a father complex to boot, then the natural tendency of the leftist's complex is to condemn only the actions of the "overdog", even in the case of the extremely brutal and criminal Japanese government, who did what they did with the approval and support of their people who were not innocent any more than the Italians or the Germans were or the French fascists or the fascists of the Eastern European countries that aided and abetted the fascist takeover were.
at 14:05 on August 6th, 2009
Come on! This is stretching it a bit don't you think? The atomic bombs were not dropped in response to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor! The attack on Pearl Harbor occurred years prior. The bombs were dropped because the consensus was that the fanatical Japanese leaders were not about to give up and would have continued fighting until millions more Japanese died. I knew a number of WW II veterans that fought the Japanese (up close and personal in the trenches). I wish they were still around to tell their stories about the atrocities that the Japanese military committed against POWs and civilians. Good lord! The Japanese, just for kicks, threw Chinese infants up in the air and caught the infants on the way down with the ends of their bayonets! The number of civilians killed by both atomic bombs in Japan pales in comparison to those killed in places such as Germany during WW II. All sides engaged in atrocities during WW II. It was a terrible time in the world. And I venture to say that had Japan developed the bomb before the west did, Japan would not have hesitated to drop the bomb on its enemies. And why wouldn't they? History shows that up until the end of WW II, Japan was an extremely war-like nation ruled by fanatics and tyrants.
at 15:02 on August 6th, 2009
Excuse me? the """reason""" the US first joined the war was because of the Pearl Harbor incident. And again, whatever the japanese soldiers did to the chinese did not justify the use of a NUCLEAR WEAPON on an entirely civilian population. This were no 'bayonets'. People were not shot, they were burned to death.
at 15:04 on August 6th, 2009
THey wanted to cripple us so that we would accept their conquest of Korea, Manchuria, China, and East Asia, and the Philippines.
Civilian populations were not innocent. The character structure of the Germans and the Japanese with their strong penchant for authoritarianism was at the basis of their racism, and their economic failures, in the case of the Japanese, drove their imperialism.
I wish the bombs had never been dropped but what I wish is that the Japanese took responsibility for causing WWII, which they basically do not.
The Japanese public schools do not teach about WWII. Italian schools are the same. I don't know about the German schools.
As far as war goes, a smaller percentage of the civilian population died during WWII than died in primitive warfare.
Try reading War Before Civilization by Keeley.
at 15:09 on August 6th, 2009
THey wanted to cripple us so that we would accept their conquest of Korea, Manchuria, China, and East Asia, and the Philippines.
Civilian populations were not innocent. The character structure of the Germans and the Japanese with their strong penchant for authoritarianism was at the basis of their racism, and their economic failures, in the case of the Japanese, drove their imperialism.
I wish the bombs had never been dropped but what I wish is that the Japanese took responsibility for causing WWII, which they basically do not.
The Japanese public schools do not teach about WWII. Italian schools are the same. I don't know about the German schools.
As far as war goes, a smaller percentage of the civilian population died during WWII than died in primitive warfare.
Try reading War Before Civilization by Keeley.
at 17:35 on August 6th, 2009
Arbol: You, I, and the rest of us civilian/non-governmental "poor soaks" will forever and always never know the real "reason" why our government, or any other government, "joined the war". For all we know, in the case of America's entering WW II, FDR may have had a few drinks that day and an argument with Eleanor and said, "Hey! Let's teach these DIRTY JAPS a lesson!" FDR, for years, didn't give a crap about the German Jews that he knew, for a fact, were being exterminated at Hitler's direction. And FDR didn't give a crap about the millions upon millions that were being exterminated in Russia at Stalin's direction. And the brutality that Japanese citizens suffered at the hands of their leaders (at the time and from day-one of their existence) was unspeakably cruel and heartless.
Hey! If I knew that I and my family had to die, I'd opt to be nuked as opposed to being starved to death; to watching my wife and daughter being raped, killed, and butchered in front of my very eyes; Stripped naked and gassed comes to mind and that's not cool either. The list goes on Arbol . . . do you get the picture? You're a lucky person Arbol . . .count your blessings. In my humble opinion, we all need to read our history a bit more closely and a bit more thoroughly in order to make the world a better place . . . . Blind ideology and adherence to dogma and myth is not conducive to the betterment of humanity and a brighter future for the world . . . .
at 13:58 on August 6th, 2009
If the Japanese were about to surrender, why didn't they surrender after the first bomb, within 24 or 48 hours?
That disproves the "about to surrender" argument.
The truth is that they wanted a CONDITIONAL, not an UNCONDITIONAL surrender so that they could save their war criminal emperor from prosecution, as I said before.
at 14:00 on August 6th, 2009
The number of civilians killed in a 12 hour firebombing of Tokyo were just the same as that atomic bomb blast.
at 14:57 on August 6th, 2009
There are many scholars, and, as I said, how can you say that they were going to unconditionally surrender when they could have done just that within 48 hours of the Hiroshima bomb dropping?
You simply can't.
And why should hundred of thousands or just tens of thousands of US soldiers die to save the lives of two hundred thousand Japanese? Based on what?
The US soldiers were "innocent" as well.
at 15:01 on August 6th, 2009
They didn't surrender the first 48 hours because members of the Supreme War Council "weren't available" for the disscussions. They couldn't be reached. They were probably scared the s* out of themselves.
at 15:07 on August 6th, 2009
Really? I guess we should have checked to see that they were all in before dropping the bomb. I do condemn us for that.
They had already had discussions and there were two camps, as usual. It took a second bomb before the hold-outs conceded to unconditional surrender over the group that wanted to protect the criminal emperor.
at 06:12 on August 7th, 2009
Have you watched the scenes in "Saving Private Ryan" with the actual invasion?
Innocent men and women were killed in all the battles, but less so than in ancient wars, believe it or not.
War is barbarous and no one sane wants it, but this careful selection of the US's dropping of the bomb stems from ideology originating in the character structure of the idealist who chooses to support the underdog, no matter how bad, over the overdog, no matter what good came out of his victory.
at 16:29 on August 6th, 2009
The power of the atomic ic bomb is far to powerful and will hopefully never have to be used again.
at 16:45 on August 6th, 2009
Anyone that has seen the carnage of even conventional weapons knows this kind of behaviour has to stop. It is useless after more than 60 years to discuss the pros and cons of what happened and why.
We should, as a human race remember it but try not second guess those that made the decisions at the time. I did see war torn Germany and again the carnage in Sarajevo. To me it is incredible of what humans beings are capable of doing to one another.
at 16:47 on August 6th, 2009
254,000 dead! (current total)