NP Rank:
London riots: a ‘Revenge of the Council Estates’ zombie flick
The Pembury estate in Hackney is a cluster of multistory brick buildings that bear more resemblance to a penitentiary than a housing project. It is the exact opposite of what most people imagine when they picture an “estate.” This is a gritty section of east London, where commuter trains squeal over graffiti-scrawled rail bridges and kebab and chip shops sit next to cut-price liquor outlets.
Often the butt of jokes amongst Londoners (I heard it referred to as “Crackney” on more than a few occasions) Hackney is a predominately working class neighborhood filled with a mix of long-term residents and new arrivals (both legal and illegal) to Britain. Though ethnically mixed, Hackney hosts a large proportion of Londoners with West Indian background. You can hear the Caribbean cadence in the street markets and see it in the hair braiding shops. There is also a sizable ‘proper east London’ segment, translated roughly: white working class. Toss in Turkish, west African and Polish accents and food and you start to get the idea.
Most estates across Britain are rough places, but Hackney’s estates have a particularly bad reputation. Living in London, you learn to be wary of the council estate youth. They are easy to spot: groups of youths wearing track suits, hoodies and gold chains hanging around the trains stations, bus stops and Pound shops, drinking, smoking and cursing. Many of these same young people have children of their own; the teenage pregnancy rate is high in council estates, and too many kids face a bleak future of dead-end jobs, life on the dole or repeated jail time.
The riots that have broken out in various parts of London started in Tottenham as a response to a police shooting – a relative rarity in the United Kingdom. According to community organizers, the police didn’t deal properly with the community after Mark Duggan, 29, was shot and killed. But what began as a political protest has morphed into something much more vague…and much darker. What is transpiring on the streets looks more like a ‘Revenge of the Council Estates’ zombie flick than a Public Enemy inspired ‘Fight the Power’ protest.
The kids on the estates have no stake in the system. They don’t believe in the power of education to lift them out of poverty, and they don’t see a point in working hard to make money. What’s the point? They believe the system is stacked against them and there is no chance of social mobility. They see their mothers, fathers, sisters and brothers stuck in the same council estate for generations – and they don’t see any way out. So might as well smash and grab while the police are busy, since “we ain’t never gonna get enough quid to buy this stuff otherwise, innit?”
I don’t believe that people who have confidence in themselves and a real stake in their community could riot like this, no matter how impoverished they convince themselves they are. It is a sad state of affairs when the only time these council-estate kids get involved in their community is when they smash the windows of the local Foot Locker and steal shoes and hoodies.
As for the answers, I can’t even begin to pontificate about ‘community engagement’ or ‘estate action plans’ or ‘education’ or ‘morals’ or whatever. I don’t know the answers is. But that doesn’t mean I am surprised that it is occurring.
For a myriad of reasons, these kids feel excluded from the wider British society that gets up, goes to work, goes shopping and goes back to their nice flats after a few drinks with their mates. The estates are places where economic and social life is stagnant, a never-ending cycle of: get drunk, get pregnant, get robbed, rob someone else, get drunk, eat chips, fight, repeat. And over the past few nights, those who are born on the estates – and will probably die on the same estates – aren’t wasting an opportunity to show the police and the rest of the country where they can (to put it bluntly) shove it: “London, get stuffed.”
Joshua Hergesheimer is a freelance journalist and photographer. He used to live in Hackney, east London, right across from the Pembury estate.



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (3)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
a female faust (not verified)at 09:17 on August 11th, 2011
with all due respect, sir, it occurs to me that there is a reall possibility that perhaps (did i soften this enough you think?) -- well i was going to say that perhaps you miss this pont, but my honey sitting next to me observed "i'm not sure there was a point." i would have to say that rings true -- but i meant that you miss the true significance or import of this "Historical Moment," to quote Darcus Howe.
certainly it offers little in the way of utilization when i try on your perspective -- and of course, i may have misunderstood. but do, sir, remain open to the possibility that older generations -- and i am including both of us here -- "have no idea." do not write off an entire category. there are changes afoot. i understand you grew up there -- i had a remotely similar childhood, i daresay -- but from the sound of it, i would wager it was not from the same side of the economic fence.
perhaps an in depth interview with a few of the youths themselves, conducted with "a discerning eye and an understanding hearing," is called for. it might also be useful to have ones heart in the right place. things are not people, and a willingness to riot does not necessarily rule out the ability to be a stakeholder. nor does hatred of the police: it would depend, you know, upon the nature of the service and the quality of the protection the police provided.
thank you for your well written piece that has inspired such a lively response, btw.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
a female faust (not verified)at 09:24 on August 11th, 2011
i have a poem i would like to share with the class: (not enough of a verse to honor Mark Duggan) in this Historical Moment, (to speak the plain Truth), were a conflict a riot, an insurrection, unrest, were possessions more precious than a flesh and blood youth, still the sins of these idiots would never be blessed. but enough (though informally) to thank Darcus Howe \
at 22:52 on September 26th, 2011
@a female faust - I thank you for your reply. I must say that being unable to return to Hackney to conduct any interviews, I am only able to offer my reflections on what I recall about my time in the area (which as you might note, was several years before any riots broke out). I hope my piece did not come across as a Cameron-esque rant against 'the lack of morals or lack of parenting' or lack of anything else (save maybe a lack of imagination about the choice of targets for a riot).
I can't figure out from your message whether or not you disagree with my assessment (that the conditions of life on the council estates breed resentment). I would be interested to hear your views on the subject. Having covered riots in other countries, I am all too familiar with interviewing those who participate, and taking their views into consideration when forming an opinion. However, I am also aware that people can use/twist certain issues so as to lend justification to their actions which might otherwise seem unrelated (i.e. we are rioting because of a police shooting, but we are stealing trainers because we want to show the rich people we can do whatever we want).
In Vancouver, for example, there was a riot following the loss of a hockey game. However, those who engaged in looting did so not because their team lost but because they were given a chance to participate in a collective action with historical significance - and get some free stuff while they were at it. This is well documented.
I don't think this skepticism about the political motivations of some of the U.K. rioters is such an uncommon view (read Zoe Williams on rioting as a novel form of shopping). I am sure, however, that those who want to see it as inherently political (and therefore inherently just) will do so.
I for one, amongst many others, am biased towards viewing rioting that focuses on banks and other symbols of global capitalism as somehow relevant to the issue at hand, while seeing people who smash windows just to get new trainers as stretching the issue to accommodate their consumerist tendencies. In such cases, while those rioting may claim to be alienated and marginalized, their actions seem to me to indicate precisely the opposite - that they are inextricably caught up in the seductiveness of consumer society and would love simply to have more money to spend.
Let me go on the record and say that I believe that rioting to change the system is probably justified in many cases. But smashing windows just to get the consumer goods behind the glass? Perhaps I should expand my definition of 'political' to include such tactics, though I am still hard pressed to determine what message that sends, other than "I want all the things that are actually keeping me in servitude to a system that exploits me."
Thanks for your thoughts, and sorry it took so long to reply.
And by the way, I did see the Darcus Howe interview (and have read enough Paul Gilroy et al to be acclimatized to the way in which people of color are marginalized in the U.K.). Obviously, being neither a person of color nor a Brit does limit my understanding of that perspective, but I think that reflections of this nature are still useful, if only in terms of giving me some context for the world outside my understanding.