The market is overpriced, the only thing driving the present rally is
hot money created out of thin air by the Fed's money-printing policies.
Hot money can flood into assets quickly - pushing the market up 60% since March. But this type of money can also flood out of assets just as fast. It's because hot money is made up of traders trying to turn a quick profits. They hope to buy now and sell to a greater fool later on. It's a recipe for disaster. When these traders think they've become the greater fool, they'll sell everything in the blink of an eye.
The US banking sector is in shambles. Banks like Goldman and JP Morgan with large trading operations are profitable again. But banks still won't lend, according to Nobel Prize winner Paul Krugman. Writing in Sunday's The New York Times, Krugman had this to say about the state of the banking sector:
“But there's an even bigger problem: while the wheeler-dealer side of the financial industry, a k a trading operations, is highly profitable again, the part of banking that really matters - lending, which fuels investment and job creation - is not. Key banks remain financially weak, and their weakness is hurting the economy as a whole.
You may recall that earlier this year there was a big debate about how to get banks lending again. Some analysts, myself included, argued that at least some major banks needed a large injection of capital from taxpayers, and that the only way to do this was to temporarily nationalize the most troubled banks. The debate faded out, however, after Citigroup and Bank of America, the banking system's weakest links, announced surprise profits. All was well, we were told, now that the banks were profitable again.
But a funny thing happened on the way back to a sound banking system: last week both Citi and BofA announced losses in the third quarter. What happened?
Part of the answer is that those earlier profits were in part a figment of the
accountants' imaginations. More broadly, however, we're looking at payback from the real economy. In the first phase of the crisis, Main Street was punished for Wall Street's misdeeds; now broad economic distress, especially persistent high unemployment, is leading to big losses on mortgage loans and credit cards.
And here's the thing: The continuing weakness of many banks is helping to perpetuate that economic distress. Banks remain reluctant to lend, and tight credit, especially for small businesses, stands in the way of the strong recovery we need.”
In other words: If the economic fundamentals don't hold up, banks won't lend, consumers can't spend, and
job losses continue. What is driving this new rally? Of course the worldwide stimulus packages and artificially low interest rates.
“This double trouble is setting us up for the next crisis,” says Financial Times columnist Wolfgang Münchau. By his calculations, “the US equities market was overvalued by 35% to 40% in mid-September. And it's been soaring since then.”
Through low interest rates, central banks are encouraging investment into risky, speculative sectors - as REITs, junky financial stocks, and highly leveraged companies - in attempt to keep the hostage to fortune economies from falling to tatters.
“When central banks eventually have to raise rates and governments halt stimulus, a
severe depression could ensue. And if they keep the easy money flowing, Münchau believes the depression might be much worse:
This, I believe, would cause the mother of all financial market crises - a bond market crash - to be followed by depression and deflation.
From where we are now, the central banks can take no course to avoid a sharp correction.”
To get a closer look at the green shoots, compare below data provided by Contrary Investor and Zero Hedge.
“ 1.) Year over Year Retail Sales Growth: 9.3% average, 5.3% now
2.) Consumer Confidence: 95.5 average; 53.1 now
3.) Capacity Utilization: 79.9% average; 66.6% now
4.) Year over Year Industrial Production: 4.1% average; -10.7% now
5.) ISM: 53.9 average; 52.6 now
6.) Payroll employment gains over period: 2.2% average; -2.0% now
7.) Decline in continued unemployment claims from cycle peak: -26.3 average; -11.6% now
8.) Year over Year growth in total credit market debt: 9.3% average; 3.0% now
10.) Year over Year growth in household debt: 8.8% average; -0.1% now
11.) P/E Multiple: 16.8x average; 20.0x now “
The comparison provides a stark reminder that government actions, not
fundamentals, are driving the present equity bubble.
"An alternative lesson from the double dip the economy took in 1938 is that the GDP created by massive fiscal stimulus is artificial. So whenever it is eventually removed, there will be
significant economic fall out. Our choice may be either to maintain large annual deficits until our creditors refuse to finance them or tolerate another leg down in our economy by accepting some measure of fiscal discipline." – says David Einhorn, of Greenlight Capital
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (13)
at 03:17 on October 22nd, 2009
Excellent job, PIM.
“When central banks eventually have to raise rates and governments halt stimulus, a severe depression could ensue. And if they keep the easy money flowing, Münchau believes the depression might be much worse"
A question here. Given the course government has embarked upon, is there any reason to believe that this won't happen?
at 03:44 on October 22nd, 2009
This possibility is very remote Hugh, the chance that it is going to happen is greater than 80% at this moment of time. Just a matter whether the Obama team (B&B) is changing course, which is not very likely either. Wait till the Dow comes down again and gold goes up. That are the first indicators.
at 09:42 on October 22nd, 2009
in other words, a 20% chance of recovery - without a Depression.?
I would have said less than a 10% chance, but close enough for gummit work....which it is.
at 04:05 on October 22nd, 2009
PIM History repeats itself. The theory is that Obama has already realized that he cannot influence the economy that is why he is now appealing to his left base to get his message out to stick with him no matter what and distribute his message to the uninitiated. Does that make sense?
at 04:49 on October 22nd, 2009
acp thanks, It could make sense, but I'm yet not convinced whether this is the case. Obama is a none quantity in economics and he has surrounded himself with the wrong people. He never should have taken Ben Bernake and have him replaced with Paul Volcker in the first place. Than Timmy Geithner is just doing what Paulson did or says to do. Timmy is far from reliable.
Hope I'm wrong, but it looks like I've got it right so far
at 09:23 on October 22nd, 2009
Thanks for your sound analysis, I agree completely.
at 11:52 on October 22nd, 2009
The "easy" way is like heroin to the folks who have had the most success with "the easy way".
Only after "crash and burn" will they surrender that position.
And, one more round of "crash and burn" is in the offing.
at 12:14 on October 22nd, 2009
Indeed Roy the 'easy way', but not out - contrary further down in the misery.
Hugh max. 20% chance that a stabilization in the economic situation may come, that doesn't implicate no depression. Technically the world is already in a depression. The crisis is going on for about 15 month, double the time of a recession. The world has an overcapacity in every aspect. That has got to be restructured, at least 30 - 40% off. Stimuli and bailouts don't solve anything, ergo those make the situation worse by the day.
at 12:25 on October 22nd, 2009
Maybe some bailouts could work and some stimuli, but only the ones that produced a real asset, the way the national highway system did, or a dam that provided hydroelectric power or even the Oakland Bay Bridge, which was built in the Depression and financed by the community's houses, believe it or not!
But, political favoritism cyncically done will not generate assets which make a real difference. What we have now is political cronyism, Wall St-Washington style.
at 22:11 on October 22nd, 2009
"The market is overpriced, the only thing driving the present rally is hot money created out of thin air by the Fed's money-printing policies."
I couldn't have said it better myself~
at 23:46 on October 22nd, 2009
Thanks Barry. Indeed Roy not all the stimuli are bad, as long it offers return on investment. The return in investment for the bailout in the banking industry is paid in bonuses to a bunch of 'happy' crooks that caused the financial crisis in the first place. This is a great injustice to all of us taxpayers that are manipulated in this situation by the Obama (B&B) team. Once people are going to realize that Obama can forget his chances on a second term.
- reply
Iffy (not verified)at 04:04 on October 23rd, 2009
I can agree the situation is bad in the US, but in the UK the trend is in the other direction. After pumping $1.2 trillion in stimulus, the UK has emerged from recession today and now has a booming housing market, real inflation (what people really have to pay for transport, taxes etc.) of around 20 %. The lesson seems to be clear: more debt, housing bubble, high inflation, big bonuses for bankers: all of this works.
at 06:35 on October 23rd, 2009
"Record recession for UK economy"tells the headline this morning and continues:
"The UK economy unexpectedly contracted by 0.4% between July and September, according to official figures, meaning the country is still in recession.
It is the first time UK gross domestic product (GDP) has contracted for six consecutive quarters, since quarterly figures were first recorded in 1955."
Actually Britain is broke was discovered in one of my essays some time ago. The lesson as Iffy correctly formulated should be clear: "more debt, housing bubble, high inflation, big bonuses for bankers: all of this works." in the wrong direction for recovery. When there really is a 20% inflation one should be alarmed, because that's the first sign of hyperinflation!