NP Rank:
McCain economic policy shaped by lobbyist, contributed to mortgage crisis
McCain economic policy shaped by lobbyistSwiss bank paid McCain co-chair to push agenda on U.S. mortgage crisis
Timothy A. Clary / AFP - Getty Images fileRepublican Presidential candidate U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ) standing with former U.S. Senator Phil Gramm (L)
Video
No 'Maverick'?
May 27: Questions about John McCain's ties to lobbyists resurface with news that his campaign co-chair was a paid bank lobbyist while advising on economic policy.Countdown
Sidebar: source documents
UBS lobbyist disclosure forms involving Phil Gramm (in order of date received by the Senate)
April 18, 2008February 8, 2008February 14, 2007July 25, 2007February 14, 2006August 14, 2006August 12, 2005February 14, 2005August 16, 2004
By Jonathan Larsen, producer,
with Keith OlbermannMSNBCupdated 7:52 p.m. CT, Tues., May. 27, 2008Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain’s national campaign general co-chair was being paid by a Swiss bank to lobby Congress about the U.S. mortgage crisis at the same time he was advising McCain about his economic policy, federal records show. [See sidebar.]
“Countdown with Keith Olbermann” reported Tuesday night that lobbying disclosure forms, filed by the giant Swiss bank UBS, list McCain’s campaign co-chair, former Texas Sen. Phil Gramm, as a lobbyist dealing specifically with legislation regarding the mortgage crisis as recently as Dec. 31, 2007.
Gramm joined the bank in 2002 and had registered as a lobbyist by 2004. UBS filed paperwork deregistering Gramm on April 18 of this year. Gramm continues to serve as a UBS vice chairman.
News of Gramm’s involvement as a paid advocate for the banking industry, simultaneous with his unpaid work on McCain’s economic policies, comes as McCain’s campaign continues to reel from the purge of four other lobbyists. Two weeks ago, McCain banned lobbyists from advising him on the same subjects covered by their lobbying work.
As early as October, 2006, RealClearPolitics.com reported that Gramm was advising McCain on economic issues. Politico.com quoted McCain advisors saying that Gramm had input on McCain’s March 26 policy speech about the mortgage crisis. McCain himself has often cited Gramm’s influence as a way to establish his bona fides with economic conservatives.
When Gramm chaired the Senate Banking Committee, he wrote and passed deregulatory legislation in more than one industry, establishing himself as a pre-eminent foe of government regulation. McCain’s March 26 speech recommended further deregulation of the banking industry as his response to the mortgage crisis.
McCain and Gramm have been friends for more than a decade. McCain chaired Gramm’s 1996 presidential run and Gramm says the two men speak every day. McCain reportedly has hinted Gramm might serve as his Treasury secretary.
Last summer, Gramm was widely credited with saving McCain’s presidential campaign.
But even before lobbying emerged as an issue, some of his own advisors told the Washington Post last month that they questioned how Gramm’s legislative record might affect McCain’s campaign.
After Gramm passed a law easing regulation of energy-commodity trading, California experienced a sharp run-up in energy costs. The energy-trading company Enron was blamed and soon collapsed.
In 1999, Gramm successfully undid the Depression-era Glass-Steagall Act, removing the decades-old wall between commercial banking, which was heavily regulated, and investment banking, which was not. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act did not extend significant new regulation to investment banking.
McCain spokesman Brian Rogers said that Gramm is "not benefitting from John McCain's plan." He also said that McCain preferred to focus on homeowners "truly in need" and opposed bailouts for affected banks, an aspect of the crisis that was not addressed in "Countdown"'s report.
Some economists fault Gramm’s deregulatory successes, as well as lax enforcement of remaining oversight powers, not just for the subprime mortgage crisis, but for its spread to other sectors of finance. Even Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has expressed interest in toughening regulations.
Jared Bernstein of the Economic Policy Institute told the Washington Post, “McCain is counting on people having very short memories and not connecting some pretty obvious dots here.”
The final UBS form listing Gramm’s work as a lobbyist says he was lobbying the Senate in the second half of 2007 regarding the Helping Families Save Their Homes in Bankruptcy Act. The bill would have let bankruptcy judges rewrite mortgage terms for Americans facing foreclosure so they could repay their loans and keep their homes.
The banking industry opposed this measure. The bill failed.
Crowd Power
-
iraqivetwifeforchange
Temple, Texas, United States









Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 08:36 on September 16th, 2008
McCain's campaign likes to sell the fiction (lie) that Gramm is no longer in the McCain-Bush Camp. However, he was at the McCain-Bush economic summit AFTER he was "fired" for saying we are a nation of whiners.
I guess McCain agrees.
at 14:49 on September 16th, 2008
Yes. McCain says change, but has the key figure to this whole stock market and financial scandal heading his financial advisory board for his Presidential election bid. Gramm is as sleazy as they get. And where was McCain on this vote that the banking industry killed? I do plan on checking into that. Wouldn't want McCain to derail from the "Straight Talk Express".
Some have made the argument that Clinton approved the deregulation during his presidency. He did from what I can tell. And I have said on my occasions that I think Clinton failed us in several areas. I did not approve of Clinton's personal affairs. I strongly disliked him for not being tougher on Congress (then Republican) in Ruwanda. And his NAFTA and deregulation I think were the biggest disasters. Of course what has happened since then, after Gramm got this bill passed, was that corporations went to extremes to rape the system for every dime they could.
Now they want us to foot the bill, after they did not share the profit. That is corporate socialism. And it is not free market. Free market allows everyone to make money off the system. I would be willing to bet that there will be no oversight or requirement that these companies and industries use their OWN profits they have made over the years to help rebuild themselves. There will be no requirement that CEO's severances and "gifts to themselves" for performances be regulated. IF they want public funding, they should have public oversight and regulation, and public profit sharing. JMHO.