NP Rank:
merry xmas and a happy nuclear winter
by DrMarty | December 21, 2011 at 03:36 am
140 views | 7 Recommendations | 5 comments
Panetta Interview To Give Obama's `Green Light' to Israel to bomb Iran
Concern has been expressed about Defense Secretary Leon Panetta's ominous interview with CBS-TV News, which appears to give Israel a "green light" to bomb Iran.
The interview shows a clear shift in Panetta's public statement of a U.S. "red line" on Iran, placing it at Israel's "red line", and without caveats as to consequences of starting an escalating war.
And although sufficiently threatening excerpts were put out today by CBS News, the full Panetta interview will be broadcast as a "60 Minutes" program -- on Christmas Day!
Panetta told CBS News Monday evening that Iran could "assemble a bomb within one year or potentially less" -- the "three quarters of a year" formulation of Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak who just left the United States after meetings with Obama, Panetta, NSC head Tom Donilon, and Secretary of State Clinton.
The U.S., said Panetta, "will take whatever steps necessary to stop it."
The following excerpt from the interview shows the change in Panetta's statements from just two weeks ago, when he warned on CBS that any attack on Iran would have severe economic repercussions worldwide.
[CBS News anchor Scott] Pelley: So are you saying that Iran can have a nuclear weapon in 2012?
Panetta: It would probably be about a year before they can do it. Perhaps a little less. But one proviso, Scott, is if they have a hidden facility somewhere in Iran [!] that may be enriching fuel.
Pelley: So that they can develop a weapon even more quickly...
Panetta: On a faster track....
Pelley: Than we believe....
Panetta: That's correct.
Pelley: If the Israelis decide to launch a military strike to prevent that weapon from being built, what sort of complications does that raise for you?
Panetta: Well, we share the same common concern. The United States does not want Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. That's a red line for us and that's a red line, obviously, for the Israelis. If we have to do it we will deal with it.
Pelley: You just said if we have to do it, we will come and do it. What is "it"?
Panetta: If they proceed and we get intelligence that they are proceeding with developing a nuclear weapon then we will take whatever steps necessary to stop it.
Pelley: Including military steps?
Panetta: There are no options off the table. (I suppose Obama, Netanyahu, and Amadindejad sitting yoga style in the center of Strawberry Fields sharing cups of tea is NOT off the table either? ed.)
Pelley: A nuclear weapon in Iran is...
Panetta: Unacceptable.
Concern has been expressed about Defense Secretary Leon Panetta's ominous interview with CBS-TV News, which appears to give Israel a "green light" to bomb Iran.
The interview shows a clear shift in Panetta's public statement of a U.S. "red line" on Iran, placing it at Israel's "red line", and without caveats as to consequences of starting an escalating war.
And although sufficiently threatening excerpts were put out today by CBS News, the full Panetta interview will be broadcast as a "60 Minutes" program -- on Christmas Day!
Panetta told CBS News Monday evening that Iran could "assemble a bomb within one year or potentially less" -- the "three quarters of a year" formulation of Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak who just left the United States after meetings with Obama, Panetta, NSC head Tom Donilon, and Secretary of State Clinton.
The U.S., said Panetta, "will take whatever steps necessary to stop it."
The following excerpt from the interview shows the change in Panetta's statements from just two weeks ago, when he warned on CBS that any attack on Iran would have severe economic repercussions worldwide.
[CBS News anchor Scott] Pelley: So are you saying that Iran can have a nuclear weapon in 2012?
Panetta: It would probably be about a year before they can do it. Perhaps a little less. But one proviso, Scott, is if they have a hidden facility somewhere in Iran [!] that may be enriching fuel.
Pelley: So that they can develop a weapon even more quickly...
Panetta: On a faster track....
Pelley: Than we believe....
Panetta: That's correct.
Pelley: If the Israelis decide to launch a military strike to prevent that weapon from being built, what sort of complications does that raise for you?
Panetta: Well, we share the same common concern. The United States does not want Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. That's a red line for us and that's a red line, obviously, for the Israelis. If we have to do it we will deal with it.
Pelley: You just said if we have to do it, we will come and do it. What is "it"?
Panetta: If they proceed and we get intelligence that they are proceeding with developing a nuclear weapon then we will take whatever steps necessary to stop it.
Pelley: Including military steps?
Panetta: There are no options off the table. (I suppose Obama, Netanyahu, and Amadindejad sitting yoga style in the center of Strawberry Fields sharing cups of tea is NOT off the table either? ed.)
Pelley: A nuclear weapon in Iran is...
Panetta: Unacceptable.
Although Israeli media today were connecting Panetta's dangerous shift with the Barack-Barak meeting, qualified U.S. military and other sources suggest for more than two weeks that Obama was changing the U.S. stance on bombing Iran toward that of Israel's Netanyahu government.
It was Obama who shifted Panetta's formulation towards "green light" for war.
But it is highly probable, these sources now say, that Barak carried a "secret dossier" to his meetings last week, of the "dodgy dossier" variety with which Tony Blair duped Colin Powell over Iraq.
Advertisement


Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (5)
at 04:25 on December 21st, 2011
Psyops -- DrMarty, are you working psyops?
at 06:28 on December 21st, 2011
Global Warming!! LOL.
at 10:28 on December 21st, 2011
It has to be stopped one way or another. A nuclear armed Iran is unacceptable under the current regime government. I believe if Israel were to attack and Iran respond the US would be instantly involved in the conflict. We would not leave until the curent government in Iran is overthrown. Thats the real problem here, not the Iranian people who will suffer greatly if and when a war develops.
at 11:08 on December 21st, 2011
Dr. Marty. This is a bit of a giant stretch from our view point in Israel. These attempts at conspiracy theories are a bit out of synch with reality from Tel Aviv. But hey, enjoy the fun and cheers.
at 12:11 on December 21st, 2011
Some Americans are quick to forget JFK and the Cuban missile crisis. Not that Islamist aren't the "new" communist horde attacking the gates of western rights and freedoms. Perhaps when it comes to a nuclear armed Hezbollah funding fundamental cleric ruled Iran -it's simply that Israel is so much closer while Americans are so much further away. Not that many wouldn't like to see Americans suffer a dirty-nuke bombing spree to take them down a peg or two for their god-like powers and influence. And while much is made of Israeli comments on pre-emptive strikes against the Iranian nuclear plants -there is probably more concern, one felt more deeply by the Arab Gulf States who are already battling Iranian hegemony with in the area with unsettled Islamist and the various terrorist organs.