NP Rank:
Michael Moore's latest message
I just had to post Michael Moore's latest message to his list. Plus, not only did the Congress vote to stop this outrageous theft from the people, but 300 economists wrote to Congress to prevent this move.
Remember, Henry George? The only 'real' remedy to exploitation is Resource Rent - also known as the Single Tax system. Read all about it on Professor Mason Gaffney's website.
Let us all try to 'enjoy' this rare turning point for human intelligence. As Professor Tim Flannery said in a lecture here in Melbourne last Thursday, ""Sometime this century, after 4 billion years, some of Earth’s regulatory systems will pass from control through evolution by natural selection, to control by human intelligence. Will humanity rise to the challenge?"
The lecture will be online at this link soon: http://www.monash.edu.au/50years/lecture-series-past.html
Congratulations, Corporate Crime Fighters! Coup Averted for Three Days! ...from Michael Moore–
Friends,
Everyone said the bill would pass. The masters of the universe were already making celebratory dinner reservations at Manhattan's finest restaurants. Personal shoppers in Dallas and Atlanta were dispatched to do the early Christmas gifting. Mad Men of Chicago and Miami were popping corks and toasting each other long before the morning latte run.
But what they didn't know was that hundreds of thousands of Americans woke up yesterday morning and decided it was time for revolt. The politicians never saw it coming. Millions of phone calls and emails hit Congress so hard it was as if Marshall Dillon, Elliot Ness and Dog the Bounty Hunter had descended on D.C. to stop the looting and arrest the thieves.
The Corporate Crime of the Century was halted by a vote of 228 to 205. It was rare and historic; no one could remember a time when a bill supported by the president and the leadership of both parties went down in defeat. That just never happens.
A lot of people are wondering why the right wing of the Republican Party joined with the left wing of the Democratic Party in voting down the thievery. Forty percent of Democrats and two-thirds of Republicans voted against the bill.
Here's what happened:
The presidential race may still be close in the polls, but the Congressional races are pointing toward a landslide for the Democrats. Few dispute the prediction that the Republicans are in for a whoopin' on November 4th. Up to 30 Republican House seats could be lost in what would be a stunning repudiation of their agenda.
The Republican reps are so scared of losing their seats, when this "financial crisis" reared its head two weeks ago, they realized they had just been handed their one and only chance to separate themselves from Bush before the election, while doing something that would make them look like they were on the side of "the people."
Watching C-Span yesterday morning was one of the best comedy shows I'd seen in ages. There they were, one Republican after another who had backed the war and sunk the country into record debt, who had voted to kill every regulation that would have kept Wall Street in check -- there they were, now crying foul and standing up for the little guy! One after another, they stood at the microphone on the House floor and threw Bush under the bus, under the train (even though they had voted to kill off our nation's trains, too), heck, they would've thrown him under the rising waters of the Lower Ninth Ward if they could've conjured up another hurricane. You know how your dog acts when sprayed by a skunk? He howls and runs around trying to shake it off, rubbing and rolling himself on every piece of your carpet, trying to get rid of the stench. That's what it looked like on the Republican side of the aisle yesterday, and it was a sight to behold.
The 95 brave Dems who broke with Barney Frank and Chris Dodd were the real heroes, just like those few who stood up and voted against the war in October of 2002. Watch the remarks from yesterday of Reps. Marcy Kaptur, Sheila Jackson Lee, and Dennis Kucinich. They spoke the truth.
The Dems who voted for the giveaway did so mostly because they were scared by the threats of Wall Street, that if the rich didn't get their handout, the market would go nuts and then it's bye-bye stock-based pension and retirement funds.
And guess what? That's exactly what Wall Street did! The largest, single-day drop in the Dow in the history of the New York Stock exchange. The news anchors last night screamed it out: Americans just lost 1.2 trillion dollars in the stock market!! It's a financial Pearl Harbor! The sky is falling! Bird flu! Killer Bees!
Of course, sane people know that nobody "lost" anything yesterday, that stocks go up and down and this too shall pass because the rich will now buy low, hold, then sell off, then buy low again.
But for now, Wall Street and its propaganda arm (the networks and media it owns) will continue to try and scare the bejesus out of you. It will be harder to get a loan. Some people will lose their jobs. A weak nation of wimps won't last long under this torture. Or will we? Is this our line in the sand?
Here's my guess: The Democratic leadership in the House secretly hoped all along that this lousy bill would go down. With Bush's proposals shredded, the Dems knew they could then write their own bill that favors the average American, not the upper 10% who were hoping for another kegger of gold.
So the ball is in the Democrats' hands. The gun from Wall Street remains at their head. Before they make their next move, let me tell you what the media kept silent about while this bill was being debated:
1. The bailout bill had NO enforcement provisions for the so-called oversight group that was going to monitor Wall Street's spending of the $700 billion;
2. It had NO penalties, fines or imprisonment for any executive who might steal any of the people's money;
3. It did NOTHING to force banks and lenders to rewrite people's mortgages to avoid foreclosures -- this bill would not have stopped ONE foreclosure!;
4. It had NO teeth anywhere in the entire piece of legislation, using words like "suggested" when referring to the government being paid back for the bailout;
5. Over 200 economists wrote to Congress and said this bill might actually WORSEN the "financial crisis" and cause even MORE of a meltdown.
Put a fork in this slab of pork. It's over. Now it is time for our side to state very clearly the laws WE want passed. I will send you my proposals later today. We've bought ourselves less than 72 hours.
Yours,
Michael Moore
MMFlint@aol.com
MichaelMoore.com




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (25)
at 01:17 on September 30th, 2008
Maireid Sullivan,
Great Post!!
at 01:20 on September 30th, 2008
Wow, Uwe, you are on the ball! :) Moore has wonderful 'cheeky' energy, and I can't fault him.
Thanks for the quick flag.
at 02:39 on September 30th, 2008
Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 02:59 on September 30th, 2008
Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 03:59 on September 30th, 2008
Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 05:24 on September 30th, 2008
Mason Gaffney's site has some wonderful material. Start with "The Great Crash of 2008" -- written in June and July, by the way -- and then "Repopulating New Orleans" and "New Life for Old Cities."
Three other Georgist sites you might also like: http://www.answersanswers.com/, http://www.wealthandwant.com/ (the URL comes fromt the subtitle to Henry George's amazing book Progress and Poverty) and http://lvtfan.typepad.com ... ("LVTfan" is a reference to Land Value Taxation, which seems to me to be the only tax worthy of having fans).
You might also look for Michael Hudson's work; some is at wealthandwant.com.
at 19:31 on September 30th, 2008
Thanks for this, LVTfan, nice to 'find' you here. I too am an LVT fan. :)
I just took a look at your website, and see that you have posted great information there, including the work of Gavin Putland and the link to Ricardo's Law, the film we made for Fred Harrison. I'll have to explore your website more.
at 06:18 on September 30th, 2008
Maireid, good stuff.
at 19:31 on September 30th, 2008
Thanks for the flag, Karen
at 07:33 on September 30th, 2008
Maireid Sullivan, thanks for drawing my attention to this!
at 19:32 on September 30th, 2008
Thank you for the flag, Amy.
at 08:39 on September 30th, 2008
Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 09:06 on September 30th, 2008
Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.
Thanks MS for bringing this story to my attention.
at 19:26 on September 30th, 2008
Thank yo for the flag, BallyZACA, I'm glad you appreciated it as much as I did.
at 09:39 on September 30th, 2008
By saving 700 billion, the defeat of this bill cost the markets 1.2 trillion dollars. The cost of this far outweighed the cost of this bill. This was a poor moment for the fiscal conservatives in the GOP to come to their senses. They are 8 years too late and should have acted earlier. The American public and the politicians who represent them have cut off their nose to spite their face.
at 09:56 on September 30th, 2008
The market needs liquidity and it needs it sooner rather than later but this bailout was not the best way to go about it. even if a politically acceptable plan is passed this will happen again if the regulation that caused all this (the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act) is not repealed.
at 10:05 on September 30th, 2008
As an engineer I know that the 'real world' is always the final judge of a design - the thing will either work or it won't ... it either meets its design goals or it doesn't ...
With money, on the other hand, who says what a dollar or a share is worth ? The markets ? The newspapers ? The White House ? The Kremlin ? Chavez ? Ahmedinejad ? The guy next door ?
It's just my opinion, and I freely admit it, but it seems to me that the American Experiment has now become just the latest remake of that old Hollywood B-film, 'Experiment in Terror' ...
at 10:17 on September 30th, 2008
As a scholar of political economy I am interested in which countries' economic syatems you consider superior to that of the US?
at 00:55 on October 1st, 2008
Over the last two years, I've been researching classical economics, which was defined by 18 century English economist David Ricardo, and came to be known as Resource Rent or Ricardo's Law or Land Value Tax. This single tax system was successfully applied in many instances internationally, and especially in the USA, into the early 1900s. The theory had an international following due to promotion by charismatic 19 c economics journalist Henry George. Basically it refers to a single tax on land and resources, not on wages or production, with a dividend paid to all citizens. Winston Churchill tried for 10 years to have this system introduced in England but the House of Lords, naturally, didn't support him.
The current system, known as neo-classical economics, a direct 'reaction' to classical economics, was promoted mainly via funding university chairs in economics by vested interests - the rich. It uses land as capital, and is the reason why every 18 years we have a major boom bust.
While there are many proponents world-wide, Fred Harrison and Professor Mason Gaffney are two well known contemporary exponents of this history. Their book "The Corruption of Economics" gives an excellent historical overview. Prof. Mason Gaffney's website has loads of good info. (see the comment above by LVTfan)
You might be interested in Kevin Cahill's book "Who Owns the World" he has a website with sample chapters. The book will be released in the USA next year.
at 12:12 on October 2nd, 2008
Thanks for your comments but they did not address my question. Which real world economic system do you believe is superior to that of the US?
at 15:52 on October 2nd, 2008
Well, Australia isn't doing too badly in comparison to the run-away situation in the States. :)
We have a surplus and and we have a large export market, and very well implemented prudential regulation under APRA - apra.gov.au
I should add that we have GREAT public services, in all areas –health, unemployment benefits, education, etc.
at 00:52 on October 1st, 2008
Hello Emilio, I've never seen this film.
Thank you for recommending it, as I will endeavor to find it.
at 00:58 on October 1st, 2008
mtippett, what you are saying isn't completely clear to me. What do you mean?
You might enjoy the following satirical treatment of neo-classical economics by two brilliant comedians.
John Bird and John Fortune (the Long Johns) brilliantly, and accurately, describing the mindset of the investment banking community in this satirical interview.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=UC31Oudc5Bg
at 18:27 on September 30th, 2008
Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.
He's kinda tough to stomach looking at, but he's always right about the government
at 19:22 on September 30th, 2008
Thanks for the flag, master_jim, I know what you mean. He doesn't look very healthy, but he is very charming and smart and has great energy. He is a great American "man-of-the-people"!