NP Rank:
Misleading opinion polls and complict US media aid Obama
President Obama gets millions in free support through federal tax dollars and a US media that absolutely upholds his administration no matter how badly it fails.
With President Obama having no possible record of achievement to run on, one could pose the logical question, “ how can this race be so supposedly close?” How could a US population suffering under high unemployment that has gone undaunted through out Obama’s term possibly seek four more years of such decline? How could voters want to re-elect Obama when the workforce participation is at an all time low since 1981. The smallest percentage of men employed in the labor force has just occurred in the last 30 years! Should the President own this? For sure! It happened as a result of his policies.
When the President's policies fail how can the polls say something else?
So, if Obama’s inability to create jobs, lower gas prices, stop his insane deficit spending, or his support of a largely unpopular Affordable Health Care Act, have been such a thorn in the sides of Americans, how could he possibly be leading in the polls in a race with Mitt Romney? Answer. The US media had admittedly been the Obama Administration’s lap dog and has been under leftist influence for decades. They will say or do anything to keep President Obama in power. Past statements made by network executives illustrate for us that the US media will dictate what they want to report to the American public. They present themselves as being experts when they aren’t. Their agenda is to exercise their liberal bias regardless of what lies and distortions of the truth they must portray.
Opinion polls not reliable
Opinion polls so heavily relied upon by the US mainstream media are considered by experts to be frivolous and unreliable as they are only a snap shot of opinion on a given day when the tides can change very suddenly. In a more sinister light of exposure the US press corps have used intentionally skewed polls to influence public opinion and discourage voter turn out for the candidate they are against. Therefore, most of the widely publicized opinion polls are fixed from the get go to reflect a predictable outcome-support for Obama when, in truth, actual public opinion was much different right after the DNC, as other polls showed a 7 point lead by Obama evaporating.
Opinion polls have a history of backfiring
- Take a look at the recent inaccuracy of poll data when in 2004 John Kerry was said to have had a deciding lead over George Bush in Ohio.
- Pollsters claimed that the Tea Party had destroyed Republican chances of a comeback in the November primaries of 2010 when the Democrats took the worst beating they ever had since the 1920’s in the elections more than 600 seats across the nation!
- Scott Walker won by a larger margin in the runoff vote than he had from his first disputed victory while the polls proclaimed him as beaten by his Democrat opponent.
- Going back in history, Reagan was said to be double digits behind incumbent President Jimmy Carter only weeks away from the elections.
One thing is for sure, neither can the polls be relied upon for accurate or honest assessment of public opinion because they have a political agenda dictated by our majority liberal biased press, who unashamedly lie and misrepresent the truth as we have seen recently in their portrayal of the President’s foreign policy over the US embassy attacks in the Middle East and North Africa. The blatant truth being exposed in the cold light of day has not slowed the pollsters down who will continue to try and mislead the American public until the final day of the elections.
Do not be swayed by the lies designed to discourage you from voting and supporting your opposition to President Obama who can make no boast about his dismal performance in the presidency and must use attacks to smear Mitt Romney in order to try and win.








Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (0)