MORE BLATANT IDEOLOGICAL NET CENSORSHIP BY U.S. INTEL GESTAPO
• LOCKHEED MARTIN APPARENTLY 'SPOOFING' WEB SITES TO MAKE IT APPEAR THAT THIS JOURNALIST'S COMMENTS WERE POSTED... BUT THE POSTS ARE MISSING WHEN SITE IS VIEWED WITH A DIFFERENT BROWSER THE NEXT MORNING.
• OCT. 28 NY TIMES ARTICLE: LOCKHEED MARTIN RUNNING UNAUTHORIZED INTEL SPY NETWORK IN AFGHANISTAN, PAKISTAN. ARTICLE APPARENTLY WAS BLOCKED FROM THE AUTHOR'S NET CONNECTION.
• SET UP BY SENIOR U.S. AIR FORCE OFFICIAL MICHAEL FURLONG, THE PROGRAM APPEARS TO PARALLEL LOCKHEED MARTIN GESTAPO-LIKE NETWORK SPYING ON UNTOLD THOUSANDS OF EXTRA-LEGALLY "TARGETED" U.S. CITIZENS HERE AT HOME.
• HOW CAN PENTAGON CONTINUE TO COVER UP DOMESTIC COMPONENT OF THESE BLATANTLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ILLEGAL PROGRAMS?
GET POLITICAL w/ VIC LIVINGSTON
It has happened again, predictably. This extrajudicially, unjustly "targeted" journalist attempted to post two comments yesterday to Josh Gerstein's blog at Politico.com. Each time, it appeared the comment was posted, when viewed over my obviously intercepted and censored internet connection.
Today, when I checked the Politico blog site using a different browser, NEITHER of my comments were posted under the blog threads to which they appeared to post yesterday.
It appears that all of my internet input to political web sites is re-directed to spoofed, counterfeited pages under the direct control of operatives of Lockheed Martin, working under contract to U.S. intelligence and the multi-agency fusion center network.
IF SUCH CENSORSHIP WERE IN ANY WAY LEGAL OR JUSTIFIABLE, WHY WOULD OPERATIVES HAVE TO SPOOF PAGES, MAKING IT APPEAR THE COMMENTS WERE POSTED -- WHEN IN FACT THE COMMENTS WERE CENSORED?
I intend to file a class action lawsuit on behalf of all Americans who are subject to this patently unconstitutional and illegal censorship regime. I suggest that the agencies, commands and corporations engaged in the serial violations of Americans' constitutional rights CEASE AND DESIST IMMEDIATELY -- so as to mitigate the damages.
I also suggest once again that Congress convene a new round of Church committee- style hearings to investigate the flagrant violations of civil and human rights by the multi-agencies of the fusion center network and U.S. security-military intelligence. It's been far too long since that post-Watergate panel attempted to curb abuses of power committed as a routine matter of course by U.S. intelligence agencies -- serial violations of the constitutional and civil rights of extra-legally targeted American citizens.
What kind of comment would draw such a draconian response -- outright government censorship? Here's one of my attempted comments, to a Politico.com blog item about a pending decision by U.S. Atty. Gen. Eric Holder on whether to hold the trial of one of the alleged 9/11 terrorists on American soil:
ATTENTION A.G. HOLDER:
How about protecting extrajudicially targeted, persecuted and electromagnetically tortured and impaired Americans from a multi-agency fusion center- based shadow government that is committing WAR CRIMES AGAINST AMERICAN CITIZENS? This veteran journalist is among the victims. Read, and ACT:
HOW U.S. GOV'T AGENCIES, COMMANDS AND THEIR 'INFO SYSTEMS' OPERATIVES IMPOSE IDEOLOGICALLY-DRIVEN CENSORSHIP ON INTERNET SPEECH:
P.S. I am not publishing "live" links because I believe that malicious code is sometimes inserted by this constitution-disrespecting warrantless surveillance and censorship regime to facilitate "spider web" tracking of readers who link to my articles.