Mosque by Ground Zero Would Stir Hatred according to NY Guiliani

@Uncensored News.The entire premise of your arguments is flimsy and preposterous.US establishment is as much hated by people all over the world as were other empires.How do you expect people,including American intellectuals,academics and political commentators,not to expose the agenda of global occupation being unrelentlingly persued by US since the end of ll WW and birth of UN.

I,too,am not supporter of construction of a mosque at ground Zero.But my opposition is not governed by Islamphobia or hatred.In my  humble opinion one hundred million $ can be put to a much better use as there are more than sufficient mosques in New York.But the statement that mosque at ground Zero will hurt sesivity of people is,in plain words,nothing better than shith.If we accept this argument then why do we construct War Memorials,Holocaust Museums?Do memories associated with war or holocaust assuage our pains and greives or does it mean we want more wars and holocausts to happen?

It is arrogance and lack of knowledge of the history of Islam and Muslims' involvement with the New World, which predates the colonization and 'acquisition' of the native, Indigenous people's lands to establish the United States, that would have anyone declare what religion should not be in the United States.

After the founding of the U.S., one of the men often held up and revered by those claiming so much respect for the founders of this nation, Thomas Jefferson, is responsible for passing legislation that was to guarantee that no one suffer for his " .... religious opinions or belief".

yep, if you are against a mosque being built in the neighborhood of ground zero your opinion is based on hatred and fear. lol. >>> the building of the mosque at ground zero was criticized by muslims are they too hateful and fearful of islam? muslim authors raheel raza and tarek fatah both said, "We Muslims know the mosque is meant to be a deliberate provocation, to thumb our noses at the infidel. The proposal has been made in bad faith, as fitna meaning "mischief-making" that is clearly forbidden in the Koran. As Muslims we are dismayed that our co-religionists have such little consideration for their fellow citizens, and wish to rub salt in their wounds and pretend they are applying a balm to sooth the pain." >>> Hossein Kamaly, Term Assistant Professor of Asian and Middle Eastern Cultures at Barnard College, Columbia University, observed: "After all, it was 19 Egyptian and Saudi Arabian thugs calling themselves Muslims who perpetrated this heinous crime on September 11th. They want to send a message of friendship, but building a mosque where there wasn't one before, is not the most nuanced way of doing that.">>> Akbar Ahmed, Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies at American University, said, " I don't think the Muslim leadership has fully appreciated the impact of 9/11 on America. They assume Americans have forgotten 9/11 and even, in a profound way, forgiven 9/11, and that has not happened. The wounds remain largely open and when wounds are raw, an episode like constructing a house of worship—even one protected by the Constitution, protected by law—becomes like salt in the wounds. >>>

Yes, it's all about sensitivity and people's feelings. I'd like to know what Guiliani thinks about this:Quran-Burning Church Vows To Proceed Without Fire Permit
As a counter to this "protest" we've got this: Jesus' General promotes "Burn a Confederate Flag Day"

@Nanute.My question is how contruction of a mosque at proposed site will hurt sensibilities of non-Muslims?In the first place,how the question of sensibilities arise?The planes which were piloted into WTC didn't take off from a mosque?Secondly,those associated with Cardoba Initiative would have done a much better job with 100 million $ which is estimated cost of their project by letting the people world over know the truth of 9/11,the role of Bush administration,the real beneficiaries of demolition of WTC.