NP Rank:
Most Canadians Cannot Afford Justice: BC's Legal Monopoly
Justice System In The Monopoly Of Financial Elite & The Legal Profession
"...less than 3-percent of civil cases filed are determined on their merits through an adjudication process. The Civil Justice Reform Working Group reached the conclusion that a significant number of cases are simply not resolved because of cost, delay and the complexity of our civil justice system..." William M.Everett, QC ,Chair, Justice Review Task Force
Evidence suggests that when it comes to accessing the justice system, Canadians are not faring any better than Third World nations, in fact the opposite may be true. Canada’s legal system is complex where procedural considerations often overshadow the real issue and provides fertile ground for skilful lawyers to manipulate the system to affect the dispensation of a fair verdict.
Unless you are representing yourself, professional legal representation for a civil dispute in British Columbia may run anywhere from $50,000 to $300,000 depending on how long it takes and whether there’s any settlement before the trial. Aside from court fees that are a small fraction of that sum, the money goes to lawyers in legal fees, and there’s no guarantee you will win or get the result you’re seeking even if you mortgage your house or blow your life savings. If you look at Statistics Canada figures of income, that means the justice system, with the exception of Small Claims, is out of reach of most Canadians. Lawyers will generally charge you a fee of $1,500 to $5,000 just to render an opinion, which means they don’t know what your case is about, and they will learn at your expense. The litigation process is fraught with penalties to the weaker party every step of the way, and lawyers are often paid to wear down opponents financially so the issue won’t go to trial.
BC lawyers don’t take cases on contingency unless it’s an ambulance case where they don’t have to work to prove liability. Hourly rates run from $250/hour for a junior to $500-600/hour for an experienced lawyer that knows what he’s talking about. That means the justice system is off limits to all but the financial elite.
The reason for the high cost of justice is simple. Legal profession is a monopoly that has been legislated by the provincial government and allowed to “regulate” itself. BC may be the worst case scenario. While Ontario allows agents, or consultants, to help or represent people that can’t afford lawyers even in criminal cases, the Law Society of British Columbia has been clamping down on everyone that threatens the profitability of the trade. For the past 20 years the Law Society of British Columbia has successfully prosecuted every would-be legal consultant under the BC Legal Profession Act, including retired police officers. An Ontario consultant firm of ex-police officers that came to Vancouver to offer help to the public with traffic tickets was chased right out of the province. The Judge said, “Our Legal Profession Act is worded differently than Ontario’s...and it’s in public interest.”
If you have a problem with your lawyer, don’t expect much help from the Law Society of British Columbia unless it’s a criminal or near criminal matter. They will tell you they don’t get involved with lawyers’ bills, so you’ll have to face the music yourself against your lawyer in court. It appears that the Society is there to protect lawyers from the public, not vice versa. In fact, an important part of the BC Legal Profession Act is about lawyers’ entitlement to get paid for their bills and about protecting the trade from intrusion by non-lawyers that are not members of the Law Society of British Columbia. If you have a claim of malpractice against your lawyer, the Law Society will defend the lawyer against your claim. How is that for a conflict of (public) interest? And all that is supposed to be for your best interests and protection.
The BC Liberals’ record in the administration of justice has been a mixed bag. One of the first things the Campbell Government did was to close down court houses across the province and cut down on the budget for court services. They moved the BC Rentalsman’s Office out of Vancouver’s West End, where most renters live, to Burnaby. On the other hand, they raised the limit of the Small Claims Court from $10,000 to $25,000, which was a positive move that increased access to the justice system, and may be the highest monetary limit for a small claims court on this continent.
Mr. Wally Oppal, BC’s Attorney General and a former judge, says the government is looking into cutting down the high cost of litigation in British Columbia by reducing court fees. The Honourable Wally Oppal knows very well that reducing court fees won’t make a dent in the armour of BC’s powerful legal monopoly, or in the ability of most people to pursue justice, and is a distraction from the real issue.
Many British Columbians are opting for self-representation in court as the only alternative to waiving their fundamental rights of pursuing justice, but there isn’t any notable government help to those that buck the system. Two years ago I applied to the University of British Columbia to take or audit a couple of law courses, but they wouldn’t let me. UBC Law School is one of the pillars of the province’s legal monopoly, and receives contributions from large legal firms.
The Courthouse Library at Vancouver’s 800 Smithe Street is an excellent repository of information for those that must represent themselves, but members of the public are kicked out at 4:30PM sharp and they cannot use the library on weekends. I wrote to Mr. Oppal last year to ask the government for better access to the library and other resources for unrepresented parties, but I never heard from him.
In 2002 a BC Justice Review Task Force was established to reform the province's justice system. It's made up of judges, prominent lawyers, and members of government. Public is not represented.
Steffan Ileman
Here's a link to some recent correspondence between the Task Force and Law Society.
http://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/utilities/docs/new_justice-review.pdf
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
steffanileman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Recommendations (16)
-
Barry ORegan
Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada -
Uwe Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan 
Anonymous users (2)


Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (7)
at 17:24 on April 21st, 2009
Justice, like war can only be won and will only be granted to those that are rich and mighty for the most part.
Every now and then and underdog gets justice, however those are an infinite minority and only allowed so the masses will be made to feel good and stay put.
at 08:55 on April 22nd, 2009
Never give up...
at 19:58 on April 22nd, 2009
Par for the course actually in Vangroovy, But then are not the majority of Politicians Lawyers, except BC has an affiinity to appointing ex dairy farmers twice in a row as Solicitor generals.
at 09:32 on April 23rd, 2009
In reflection, Canadians appear to face an inJustice System similar to that of the United States.
Self-representation can be a very daunting and gruelling task because motions and other matters brought before the court must be presented in particular formats and within specfic time frames according to procedural "rules" and unless one who is pro-se takes the time and puts in the effort to quickly learn, the chance of prevailing in other than small claims is almost nil.
I learned this the hard way. Because of equally high costs associated with hiring an attorney, I opted for self-representation nine years ago in a large civil case. Although I was able to prevail on every motion I filed with the court, the case still dragged on for five years while the defense unsuccessfully employed three separate attorneys throughout this time. I could only imagine what the costs would have been had I hired an attorney during this five year period.
Upon the defendant realizing that everything was stacked in opposition to any defense, the defendant filed for bankruptcy (which was ultimately disapproved by the bankruptcy court) and moved out of the court's jurisdiction and to another State.
With the five years of legal reseaching, cramming, and fumbling through while winning battles on all fronts, I was eventully forced to cede the war as being a no win situation and let it go. Although I was not compensated for related expenses and losses in prosecution the matter or regarding the reason the claim was brought forward, I suppose the satisfaction of knowing the defendant was alternatively forced to pay four different layers, (including the bankruptcy attorney), might be viewed as justice in itself.
Similarly as stated in the Steffan's story, the attorneys are usually the only ones that truly reap the benefit of the judicial system in the end.
at 10:01 on April 23rd, 2009
Thank you for this excellent comment.
I have similar experiences, and still going through it, except that I've started to enjoy it as an educational opportunity. Very few people get to experience the legal system from the inside out as I have been doing. I now have enough to write a book about it.
There's one fundamental difference between the U.S. and Canada. In the U.S. justice springs from the people, as it should, whereas in our Colonial system it's dispensed by a benevolent ruler, who's not always so benevolent or reasonable.
If you look under the link at the bottom of the page and examine the correspondence, you will see that it's the legal establishment represented by the Law Society resisting real reform and unwilling to give up its monopoly.
Keep up the good old American spirit, we all need it.
at 12:51 on May 4th, 2009
no access to justice for me and five other defendants from haisla bc. the justice system appears to be impregnable with respect to civil cases when the defendant does not have any finances and the band council controls the bands money supply. it just stinks. do you know a good lawyer willing to work with hereditary chiefs for reform.
at 18:58 on May 4th, 2009
I think so