Mubarak remains: Washington powerless. Who is manipulating whom?

by peter.reardon | February 10, 2011 at 03:39 pm
174 views | 2 Recommendations | 5 comments

peter.reardon on Opinion: Middle East

Mubarak's most recent speech to the people of Egypt did not address the call of the people for him to leave office. He will, he says his  government will make changes to the constitution, commonly said by national journalists and ordinary people as being too little too late.

The protester's were collectively unprepared for Mubarak to remain in power so there is a lull in the public reaction to Mubarak's speech. There seems be no contingency plan for any action to be implemented by the protesters if Mubarak does not step down.

He didn't step-down of course, and the protesters have now to consider a ' next step'. This period of indecision gives the repressive state time to reposition its armed police and military pro-government force to shepherd the unarmed [?] protesters out of Tahrir Square, in Cairo.

It seems that there are groups moving from Tahir Square to  the Presidential Palace a distance of about 15 -20 kilometers from the centre of Cairo and it is uncertain how close to the Palace the protesters will be permitted to establish another centre for democratic protest against President Mubarak. 

Meanwhile, the American government,which has paid the Egyptian army more than one billion dollars a year to buy US manufactured weapons of war, which would be turned on the pro-democratic demonstrations.

Another example of America, a so-called democratic country, in support of a totalitarian regime in its suppression of ordinary people.

The protest continues.

(End)

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
3
Karen Hatter

Hi Peter,

It would seem the protestors were unprepared on how to proceed because theirs was a coordinated protest and uprising, not a true revolution with complete, fully articulated goals for altering the course of Egypt's history.

In addition, an orchestrated revolution would have had some form of leadership it wanted to put in place of the Mubarak regime.

0
metatron705

orifieltrony.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/
type it on search

1
"thirty-aught-six"

Peter, be careful of jumping on the "pro-democracy" band wagon. Although many of the words are spoken, shouted and carried on posters by Egyptians, there is a huge disconnect between what the people want and what the Muslim Brotherhood want. And it is the Mulsim Brotherhood[MB] who is strongly behind the social unrest. Make no mistake about that.

The investigative news out of the middle east on this is not making it to the western media as the mainstream media[MSM] would rather champion it as a social uprising for democracy with out acknowledging the MB's overriding organization after the "spontaneous" protest against Mubarek, nor the MB's continuous effort to dictate social and religious behavior according to their version of Islam.

Egypt has been, is, one of the most socially liberal expression in the middle east. And it has been Mubarek that has kept the MB at bay for these many years, driving the MB outside Egypt to exploit political weaknesses in Iraq, Lebanon, Palestine and elsewhere to fulfill their religious hegemony of ultra-conservative Sharia.

"Vice President Omar Suleiman on Thursday said he had invited the Brotherhood into negotiations over Egypt's future and the transition to democracy." That is a huge concession to a political entity that has been outlawed since the '50's in Egypt. FOR NO REASON???

0
peter.reardon

Hi!

Thanks for reading, and your comment.

Peter

1
"thirty-aught-six"

No worries. We can toast with a great Canadian ale. Labatt's 50. I've enjoyed that beer on many an excursion to central/ northern Ontario. Fishing Lake Nipigon, north of Thunder Bay. I've cooked many a northern pike for lunch on the shores of that big bastard. Hoorah!

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from