Musings on the overthrow of democracy

by Susan Marie Kovalinsky | October 4, 2009 at 07:18 pm
201 views | 14 Recommendations | 1 comment

Photos

Loading photos...

"Since 2001 and continuing thru with President Obama, a regime of suppression and disinformation has taken over in Washington, totally unaccountable to Congress or the people. With the destruction of any ability for a people to make an informed decision through state secrecy laws without oversight and limit, there can be no democratic rule."

~ Gordon Duff,  Salem News 

"Into the Dark:  America's descent into a Police State"  


It seems there is a sort of blueprint or schematic tag to the steady overthrow,  by drops and pinpricks,  of democracy.  Gordon Duff of Salem News online enlightens us on this below.

Corruption of the three basic ingredients to a democracy:  a free press,  rule of law in government,  and intelligent and friendly discourse of free speech,  spells a relative death of democracy.

The alarm is being sounded now.  Is it too late,  one wonders, to help matters?


What are the basic mechanisms to overthrow a democracy?

If you control three institutions, you control a nation:

 First is the press. If you can manipulate the news, suppressing stories, stopping investigations and protecting "flawed" individuals while making the public look under their beds for imaginary enemies, your power is almost unlimited.

Second is government itself. If you can control government by putting the real power in the hands of a few committee chairmen or key "deal makers" and can flood the system with dirty money, there will be no real investigations, only coverups and no real laws, only raids on the public treasury by the powerful while crumbs are passed out to others.

Third is public opinion. Turning an intelligent electorate into a howling mob requires an endless series of both outlandish conspiracies and real threats, the truth behind all being misdirected through a concerted effort to divide a populace and keep them at each other, even to the brink of civil war, all to protect the economic cabal growing fat off "terror war" and "deregulation," a buzzword for massive theft.

When former FBI translator, Sibel Edmonds, reported that Osama bin Laden was an active US asset up to the second the planes hit the twin towers on 9/11, she was put under Patriot Act gag orders by Attorney General John Ashcroft that lasted for years. Now that she is speaking, laying out facts supported by key FBI and CIA experts, nothing is hitting our papers. How bad are the facts being kept from us?

"The 2008 Sunday Times series detailed Edmonds' allegations that Bush's Under Secretary of State Grossman --- the third-highest ranking official in the State Department, after Colin Powell and Richard Armitage --- worked closely with both the Turks and Israel in obtaining and selling U.S. nuclear weapons technology on the worldwide black market, and that he had even tipped off Turkish diplomatic colleagues about the true identify of then-covert CIA operative Valerie Plame-Wilson's front company, Brewster Jennings, several years before the operation was named publicly by columnist Robert Novak"

While we were pretending to use our Patriot Acts to defend America through torturing suspects to get the truth, we are learning that much more of that coerced testimony may have been gathered to support a wide coverup of government crimes, many at the highest level. The American Conservative goes on:

These are some of the things Edmond has sworn to under oath, taken from an interview with former CIA official Philip Geraldi printed in the American Conservative:

. . . Basically, you map out a corruption scheme involving U.S. government employees and members of Congress and agents of foreign governments. These agents were able to obtain information that was either used directly by those foreign governments or sold to third parties, with the proceeds often used as bribes to breed further corruption. Let’s start with the first government official you identified, Marc Grossman, then the third highest-ranking official at the State Department.. . 

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
0
Babel-Fish

Plato (428/427 BC – 348/347 BC) warn us about this problem concerning so call democracy, the senate base system styled on Greek and Roman governance of course was favorable to the elitist. It 2001 the system was bent to the requirements of a group of capitalist and honed to what we are seeing today.

But has the newer methodology took one pace to many I would say yes. But there can never be a pure democratic system that sees the needs for all and not needs of the elite few that are there for the money and not for patriotic duty for their country.

I am in total agreement with the article its put a picture of how it really is or very very close to the truth. But corruption has been inset since the founding of USA.   


What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Rhonda J Mangus
First Flagged at 10:33 PM, Oct 4, 2009 by Rhonda J Mangus

Related Stories

Recommendations (14)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from