The Muslims at the Back Door

While Muslim terrorists in Afghanistan and Iraq are being defeated militarily in their attempt to establish a new caliphate through terror tactics – mainly the killings of westerners and anyone else they disagree with - with bombings, torture and decapitation, the establishment of their cruel Sharia law is quietly being infiltrated in the United States, Canada, Great Britain and in many other parts of the world.

I have previously discussed many times that the Muslim religion is much more than a religion, it is also a political movement which brings with it a set of civil laws (the Sharia) that includes the death penalty for the crime of adultery, and other such punishments such as amputations for the crime of theft and flogging for fornication or public intoxication. My readers also know that, while I strongly support President Bush’s efforts to prevent the War on Terror from becoming a religious war, and his efforts to protect American citizens of the Muslim faith, I also believe that any further immigration of Muslims should be drastically curtailed or ended.

Today I want to remind everyone of four situations that are happening here in the U.S. and in Canada and Great Britain. In all three countries Muslims have attempted to use the political processes of a free people to insinuate Sharia and/or ‘hate-speech’ distortions into our own legal systems – the end game of all this is to turn on its head the democracy which allows and abides this fascist poison.

Canada:

1. Canada is fresh from a battle during which Muslims attempted to impose Sharia into the legal system of the Province of Ontario. Through the heroic efforts of a Canadian immigrant lady from Iran, named Homa Arjomand, who has devoted her life to fighting the Sharia and its abuse of women’s rights, Canadians were warned of what was happening and defeated the attempt largely through her efforts.

2. Author Mark Steyn published a piece in Macleans magazine pointing out the incredible differences in birth rates of Muslims vs. nonMuslims. He and Macleans have now been hauled up before a 'speech code' commission. See the excerpt and view the video below:

“Last month the students and the Canadian Islamic Congress (CIC), a lobby group, filed complaints against Maclean's at the Canadian Human Rights Commission, as well as those of Ontario and British Columbia. The article, the CIC claimed, harmed Muslims' “sense of dignity and self-worth”.

Their choice of forum has brought protests. The criminal code has hate-propaganda provisions, but using these requires convincing a prosecutor. The bar is much lower for Human Rights Commissions and their tribunals. These were set up to deal with discrimination on grounds such as race or sex in jobs, housing or services. Even the man who inspired them, Alan Borovoy, a civil-liberties lawyer, is dismayed at their misuse to limit free speech. The tribunals can only levy small fines and give an order to desist. But the proceedings involve steep costs for defendants, whereas plaintiffs pay nothing if the commission decides there are grounds to proceed.

Much of Canada's press and many broadcasters are already noted for politically correct blandness. Some fear that the case can only make that worse. Mr Steyn and others hope it will prompt a narrower brief for the commissions, or even their abolition. As he put it in his blog, “I don't want to get off the hook. I want to take the hook and stick it up the collective butt of these thought police.” Economist

CLICK FOR VIDEO
O dhimmi Canada


United States:

3. Most of us are aware of the case of the ‘Flying Imams”

Intimidation by lawsuit
Mar. 30, 2007 Arizona Republic (Excerpt)
“As an act of coldblooded strategy, the pending lawsuit of the "flying imams" is a clever one.

It is directed not merely at an airline or at a government. It is directed at passengers, at anyone flying on a commercial airliner who might be so bold as to actually report what they believe may be "suspicious activity."

It is a strategy aimed at all of us. What, after all, do ordinary citizens fear almost as much as terrorism in the skies? It is the prospect of being dunned into their dotage - and into poverty - by lawyers and process servers demanding to know why they are so hateful.

And, so, the result: Let the other guy report what he sees, thank you.

Last November, six Muslim imams were returning to the Phoenix area from a conference in Minneapolis when they were removed from their US Airways flight for what passengers, crew and airline personnel described as suspicious activity, which included reports of chanting "Allah" in the gate area and, once on board, switching their seat assignments and asking for seat belt extenders that they didn't need.

The imams, five of whom live in the Valley, immediately claimed they were the victims of discrimination. They claimed to have done nothing more ominous than quietly pray at the times prescribed by the tenets of their religion. Surrounded by lawyers, they plaintively insisted they were targeted merely for "flying while Muslim."

Then they filed a federal lawsuit. Among the defendants cited, deep in Paragraph 21, are unnamed persons to be named later - certain "John Does," in the legal parlance. The lawsuit specifically refers to two passengers who stared at the imams as they prayed. But it isn't limited to them.”

Great Britain:

4. Those following what is happening in British society are dismayed by the successful efforts of the large Muslim population there to impose their customs and practices on all the rest of the British citizens - from the deletion of all references to pigs to the wearing of burkas while testifying in court – to the actual imposition of the Sharia into British civil law. Right now there is a controversy surrounding a liberal church elder:

Sharia law row: Archbishop is in shock as he faces demands to quit
09.02.08 ThisIsLondon (Excerpt)

Under fire: Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams
“The Archbishop of Canterbury was facing demands to quit last night as the row over sharia law intensified.

Leading bishops publicly contradicted Dr Rowan Williams's call for Islamic law to be brought into the British legal system.”

The problem in England, Canada and in the United States is the same: modern liberals, devoted to the poisonous concept of multiculturalism, refuse to face the dangers in which this philosophy places us all. They promote the values of other cultures because this makes them feel good, and they undermine efforts to reject dangerous and divisive practices. Many immigrants risked everything to escape their culture. How stupid is it to elevate these cultures above our own, because, make no mistake, this is the end game of the multiculturalists.