NP Rank:
Myths and Falsehoods Surrounding Sonia Sotomayor's Nomination
This article notes Conservatives and the Republican Party, especially Right Wing elements within the Party, came out in opposition of any potential nominee for the Supreme Court that would be named by President Obama before any names had been suggested.
If confirmed, Judge Sonia Sotomayor of the New York Second Circuit Court of Appeals would replace Justice David Souter, who plans to leave the bench in June 2009.
Since Judge Sotomayor has been named, it has been alleged mistruths and misinformation have occurred regarding the nominee.
Click here to read Myths and Falsehoods Surrounding the Sotomayor Nomination, from Media Matters.
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
Karen Hatter
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Recommendations (66)
-
Jordan Yerman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
Uwe Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
Rob Walker
Toronto, Canada -
Mary Richard
Toronto, Canada
-
mudricky
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom -
caj1
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States -
A. Tran
New York, New York, United States -
Spydermonkey
huntsville, Alabama, United States -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (28)
at 03:52 on June 1st, 2009
Also at NowPublic :
In Order to Form a More Perfect Union
Judge Sotomayor's Comments Mirror Justices Scalia and Alito
at 06:20 on June 1st, 2009
Thank you for the post Karen, am not so sure about this though and can not make up my mind either way.
I am not as optimistic and cheer full as you seem to be here and of Obama in general.
I think we do need a healthy dose of objective criticism here in the interest of all involved and this wold be especial of concern to the American people.
The more I hear Obama his speeches and opinions and the more I read up on the news, the more I start to become sceptical.
at 07:25 on June 1st, 2009
Thank you for the recommend.
However, please reserve your characterization of my work here as cheerful as you are incorrect, in that the verb 'cheerful' cannot be used to describe anything I have commented on or written anywhere here.
at 07:46 on June 1st, 2009
Thank you as usual Karen, for clarifying this so nicely.
at 06:51 on June 1st, 2009
She was first recommended to the "big leagues" by a Republican president, though, as her rather prolific career went on, right-leaning opinions of her have obviously changed.
at 07:18 on June 1st, 2009
Jordan, that is a fact, the support from Republican Bush the Elder when he tapped her to serve, that many Republicans decided to forget.
Arguing for and against her at the same time might have been a confusing process, I guess.
at 11:41 on June 1st, 2009
Apologism for blatant racism.... Part of a larger trend here in America
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/weekly-riot-return-systemic-racism
at 13:07 on June 1st, 2009
Cries of reverse racism, emanating from many, telegraphs a fear of an unknown future in a demographically changing America, where an assumed priviledge has traditionally ruled the land.
at 17:41 on June 1st, 2009
Karen this is dellutional at best and racist for certain. 10% of the population in the US taking over the land and taking revenge on inoccent people because they are the White majority and some few of them had ancestors that where racist and oppressors them self?
at 18:00 on June 1st, 2009
The United States Census Bureau changed the date for all groups known as minorities, that is all groups indentifying as non-White/Caucasian minorities, with Latino/Hispanics the largest growing group within America, outnumbering those considering themselves as White/Caucasian Americans from occurring in the year 2042 instead of 2050, eight years earlier than projected.
The America.gov link above is dated August 15, 2008.
For decades, members of the Conservative Right, like Pat Buchanan, in America in 2050: Another Country, have lamented the reality of this occurrence, with an obvious dread at the prospect.
From Mr. Buchanan's article:
Moreover, as multiculturalism has captured our schools and colleges, immigrant children will have prejudices and grievances against America and the West reinforced as they learn. The academic elite that controls these schools already paints America as a nation with a rancid history of genocide, slavery, racism, oppression and imperialism.
As immigrant children grow up, who will teach them to love and cherish America? Will they not come to exhibit that same sullen hostility to our country we see erupting at soccer games with Mexico today? There, Mexican fans, whether in the Los Angeles Coliseum or in Guadalajara, curse our players, shout down our national anthem and chant “Osama! Osama!” when the Mexican team scores.
at 18:07 on June 1st, 2009
I read a few articles that stated violence and racism between the minorities, especialy from Black American toward Hispanics.
I think it is normal that the majority is holding most positions of power, once the Hispanic will be the Majority of the US they will hold most positions of power as well. I see that a s normal and nothing wrong with it either.
Are you going to turn against the Hispanic and accuse them for their Spanish conquistador ancestors once they will be the Majority?
I think the problem is not getting solved one way or the other until all parties and groups reject racism and promote an education that focuses on Humanity as a whole and on justice for all as well as equality and unity.
at 18:39 on June 1st, 2009
I have no idea what the question about Spanish Conquistadors and Hispanics has to do with my statements.
As I've said, for decades, the Right Wing Conservatives, White supremacist/nationalists and others have warned of the 'browning' of America, as it has been called.
The concerns for this reality, among those identifying as White that view this new dynamic as a horrifying reality, can be found among the Conservative Council of Citizens, which states, in part, as point two of its principles:
We believe the United States is a European country and that Americans are part of the European people. We believe that the United States derives from and is an integral part of European civilization and the European people and that the American people and government should remain European in their composition and character.
Former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke and his organization, Bill O'Reilly and others also express their concerns for this coming reality.
Any questions re: this coming event may be better addressed by those who have organized around these concerns with an eye toward calamity.
at 19:18 on June 1st, 2009
Karen the KKK are a few extremist that I would certainly not take serious what so ever.
To base once opinion on the talk or actions of some extremist and radicals is hardly objective nor can one call this having a balanced view. It is as ridiculous as using Mugabe and his togs to make an opinion of all Black African and judge them by it. Or Idi-Amin Dada would be another such extremist.
Lets be real and objective.
It is merely looking for blame and excuses rather then truth and solutions.
Why the Conquistador analogy.
at 19:39 on June 1st, 2009
Paschen, when I wrote above of there being a fear of the changing demographics occurring in America, you wrote:
Karen this is dellutional at best and racist for certain.
All those that have espoused their rantings of doom and gloom may be delusional.
National security concerns for 'one issue' extremists, like abortion, as had been reported by Homeland Security, have been, in the most recent case, been proven a true concern, with someone now being held in relation to the killing of the abortion doctor in Kansas while he was in his church. The man being held belonged to an extremist anti government group.
The 'lone wolf' element of any so called extremist group has been identified as the greatest danger nor can they be referred to as a 'few' when there are 888 identified hate groups nationwide in the United States, with many non member supporters, with the numbers of members and supporters growing since the election of the nation's first African American president.
at 20:16 on June 1st, 2009
I do not say that a hate group is not dangerous, see the Taliban or the FLN, however we can not use a hate group as a base to judge a people nor as justification for reverse racism or hate.
Every transition brings fear with it and those are usually put to rest after the realization comes in that there is nothing to fear. Of course there are transitions that should be worrisome, however a demographic transition for one ethnical group or a religion becoming a majority over another is by it self nothing to worry about.
I have been living as a religious minority as well as an ethnical one all my life and Never had a problem nor felt discriminated, because I simply refused to be. And education is the best way out, why most well educated people do not adder to racism nor to fears.
There are exceptions of course.
Obama is in my view no different then any other President of the US, he has good and bad sides to him self and he is first of all a politician that knows how to play the game. Whether he is a good or bad President, that only time will tell and history will judge him as it did all his predecessors. It is clear that the US will have more and more President out of mixed races or being Black American and especially Hispanic will dominate the US politics with in a generation.
I am sceptical of all leaders though, May they be French, Russian, German, Japanese, Chinese or American. I do become more sceptical though when ever euphoria is involved.
Critics are healthy and should always be part of the process. Those are the pillar of Democracy and Justice.
I would in this day and age and in light of a global world and view stop using the term African-America, since you imply by that black, however this is discriminating to all White African-American that actually are born in African and held an African Citizenship and immigrated to the US later on in their life. Black French are not French African either, they where born in France by French Parents and are French.
This is not meant as an offence nor an attack Karen it is my Opinion as an African-European.
My grand Parents are Berber (North African), Prussian (German) and Huguenots (French). I am born and raised in African, still hold Cameroon Citizenship. I can rightfully claim to be African, not Obama though, he is American.
at 21:16 on June 1st, 2009
The claims of reverse racism, mainly decried by those who identify as White in America, have increased as the 'browning' of America has continued.
The latest clamoring among the Conservative Right regarding the almost assured confirmation of the nation's first Latina Supreme Court Justice, may indicate the known fear that has always been professed by the Right regarding immigration.
Extrapolation always has it's dangers but, it is predicted immigration issues will be coming up before the Supreme Court soon, in the future. This may be an outcome the Right may see as somehow tied to some adverse decision, courtesy of Justice Sotomayor, a possible concern of theirs, among other issues.
In the case of the use of the appellation African American, many of those who descended from the enslaved brought out of Africa and dispersed around the world, those who were forcibly settled here, in America, reserve the right to identify with the land mass that would most likely have been their homeland, had they not been brought here.
As an individual, I will continue to identify with the homeland that was denied my family for at least six generations on my maternal side and an unknown number on my paternal side.
Your beliefs are your own and I take no offense.
President Barack Hussein Obama Jr. was born of an African man from Kenya and an American woman. He is African American.
at 21:51 on June 1st, 2009
I do accept and respect your point and reasoning about this issue, I just have trouble supporting it, since it would open the doors to a snow ball effect turning into an avalanche.
Such claims are what has caused the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Sri-Lanka conflict as well as the Serbian conflicts and several other conflicts.
I think we have to come to term with the past and accept the present and embrace it. Or we never get out of this hate, racism and phobias that prevail still today in many countries and cultures as well as religions.
I fear that one day because of this perception and claim some one is going to invade Africa from the US claiming it to be rightfully theirs and we end up with anther Israeli-Palestinian stile conflict.
I do not think that would be healthy nor desirable. No one would have though a century ago that Israel would be and that this would end up in such a disaster either.
This sort of talk and perception does open the door for more such conflicts.
at 22:56 on June 1st, 2009
I have come to terms with the past, embracing the present and accepting where I am and who I am.
My comments were not offered in an attempt to solicit support nor do I agree with your assessments and the logic you've employed to address my African American identity.
at 20:20 on June 2nd, 2009
Karen you may totally have misunderstood my comment. Or I may have failed to make my self clear. However it could also be an unwillingness to understand.
Wish ever it may be, has little relevance any longer.
at 04:26 on June 3rd, 2009
Paschen, you wrote, regarding my African American identity:
I would in this day and age and in light of a global world and view stop using the term African-America, since you imply by that black, however this is discriminating to all White African-American that actually are born in African and held an African Citizenship and immigrated to the US later on in their life.
You also wrote:
I fear that one day because of this perception and claim some one is going to invade Africa from the US claiming it to be rightfully theirs and we end up with anther Israeli-Palestinian stile conflict.
On this matter, I believe I understand you very well.
at 19:11 on June 1st, 2009
Thanks for that link, Karen. Interesting to see the demographics report of the U.S. Census, even if one year old. The new Census will be ongoing soon. I think Sonia Sotomayor is O.K.
at 22:59 on June 1st, 2009
You're welcome, Caj1.
at 10:36 on August 1st, 2009
Hmm close Karen, but wrong. They are actually cries against ACTUAL racism which many intellectual hypocrites in our society refuse to acknowledge for two reasons. A they have a vindictive nature which stems from historical disparity against their own demographic. And two, they are open racialists, and xenophobes themselves. Point is RACISM is RACISM is RACISM, regardless of how much the racist wraps themselves in the cloak of victimhood.
at 11:39 on August 2nd, 2009
Regarding the myth of reverse racism, perceived racism against White males, from Tim Wise :
Simply put, what separates white racism from any other form, and what makes anti-black, anti-brown, anti-yellow, or anti-red humor more biting and more dangerous than its anti-white equivalent is the ability of the former to become lodged in the minds of and perceptions of the citizenry.
White perceptions are what end up counting in a white-dominated society. If whites say Indians are savages (be they of the “noble” or vicious type), then by God, they’ll be seen as savages. If Indians say whites are mayonnaise-eating Amway salespeople, who the hell is going to care? If anything, whites will simply turn it into a marketing opportunity. When you have the power, you can afford to be self-deprecating, after all.
As Miz Sheria wrote :
“ .... I've concluded that I am bone-weary of the proliferation of voices in white America who continue to scream about reverse racism or black racism. It is such an insult to the real racism endured by black Americans.
When young black men gather on a summer's night, kidnap a young white man, tie him to a truck, and drag him down the highway until he is nothing but a bloodied mass of bone and flesh, speak to me of black racism. When grown black men plant a bomb in a church and murder young white children in their Sunday best, speak to me of black racism. When a crowd of black mothers gather in Boston to hurl obscenities, racial epithets, and bricks at school buses filled with little white children, speak to me of black racism.
When white bodies dangle from tree limbs and black families, children included, mill about below, smiling as if they have just witnessed some form of pleasant entertainment, speak to me of black racism. When black entrepreneurs, realizing that there is money to be made, make and sell postcards memorializing these lynchings, speak to me of black racism.
When grown black men kidnap, torture, and murder a 14-year-old white boy because he allegedly showed too much familiarity towards a black woman, speak to me of black racism. When black men--business leaders, legislators, governors, law enforcement, and state militias--gather together and march into white communities, burning, looting, and murdering to intimidate white people from trying to exercise their rights newly granted under the federal Constitution, successfully taking away the most fundamental right of a free people, the right to vote, speak to me of black racism.
When white soldiers who return from defending their country find themselves being told that they must sit at the back of the bus, speak to me of black racism. When white people have to enter business establishments through the back door, or are barred from entry by signs reading, "No Whites Allowed," speak to me of black racism. But until these things come to pass, don't insult me or my people by calling us racists. (BTW, all of the examples that I reference are real and occurred long after the official end of slavery) an insult to the real racism endured by black Americans.”
As the power structure in place remains an instrument that has been shaped to aid the decendants of the original creators of the U.S. and as long as their descendants utilize that structure to wield power, as has been done in the present and the past, even when it has been called upon to attempt to correct the defects built into this nation during the birth of this republic, there will never exist what is being called reverse racism, a term which in and of itself is silly and linguistically strained, with the term, implying the opposite of racism, which should mean no racism at all.
Reverse racism doesn't exist no matter how much racists wrap themselves in a cloak of denial.
at 17:36 on June 1st, 2009
This is just a thought, if Judge Sonia Sotomayor is confirmed to replace Justice David Souter, it would not necessarily alter or shift the Supreme Court. Over the years, Justice David Souter had voted along the side of Justices Ginsburg and Breyer.
at 03:22 on June 2nd, 2009
A valid point, Pythiian1, in that the balance of the Court may not be effected.
It would seem the knee jerk negativity erupting from elements of the Republican Party and Conservatives can only be originating from her Puerto Rican heritage since, as you point out, based solely on her record, it would not appear she is the much feared flaming liberal the Republican Party had planned to fight tooth and nail to deny the seat on the bench.
As the Republican Party does not have the votes to deny Judge Sotomayor the seat, it seems playing the voice of opposition may be their intent.
The visceral ugliness, attacking her intelligence, her choice of foods, being a woman, all of that tends to further isolate the Republican Party.
Yet, it is said, all of those ploys play to the much alluded to base of the Republican Party, whomever it is they may be, a tactic which may be a huge mistake.
at 00:32 on June 2nd, 2009
I think a lot of the "but it's reverse racism!" viewpoints on here are well-meaning, but lacking some idea of the whole picture.
Before anything else, I have to say, "reverse racism" is a faulty and somewhat silly term. Racism is racism, no matter what. However, a lot of what people call "reverse racism" is not racism, but seen as such because it doesn't adhere to the norms of privilege that they're used to.
The reason it's not possible nor right to expect everyone to just "draw a line under" America's entire history of colonialism and slavery is because what happened and what came about during those periods still has a very large, normalized, pervasive impact today on people of the races that were colonized, enslaved, oppressed, etc. To try and just erase over that and deem all attempts of retribution or acknowledgement as simply "racist" is to deny that history and its detrimental consequences for millions of people today, who are supposed to be full members of the country they call theirs and by which they are, at least on paper and by various tax agencies, recognized as citizens. Calling such actions or views "racist" or "reverse racist" assumes that we're all starting from some ground zero, when--assuming zero is complete equality, "negative" is racism, and "positive" is what MAY potentially actually be "reverse racism"--society as a whole is still very much on the negative side of the scale.
at 02:50 on June 2nd, 2009
Thank you for commenting. Very well articulated, Cyn.khoo.