NP Rank:
Naomi Klein: Wall Street is a Multi-Trillion Dollar Crime Scene, Dems are Complicit
Naomi Klein, author of the best-selling "Shock Doctrine" about capitalist exploitation of disaster for profit, comments on the Wall Street Bailout, the Federal Reserve extending $2 trillion in emergency loans without disclosing recipients or collateral, the Treasury's illegal unilateral change to section 382 of the tax code aka the "Wells Fargo Ruling" that will cost the Treasury up to $140 billion in tax revenue from mega-corps, and the Dem's failure to hold the Bush Administration and their crony capitalist agency heads accountable for what amounts to criminal actions; Obama and the Dems don't want to roil the markets, as financial industry insiders are among their biggest campaign contributors. "Change" has given way to "smooth transition".
Contact Congress and the Obama transition team, let them know what the Dems need to do to get your votes in 2010 and 2012.
The more details emerge, the clearer it becomes that Washington's handling of the Wall Street bailout is not merely incompetent. It is borderline criminal.
In a moment of high panic in late September, the U.S. Treasury unilaterally pushed through a radical change in how bank mergers are taxed -- a change long sought by the industry. Despite the fact that this move will deprive the government of as much as $140 billion in tax revenue, lawmakers found out only after the fact. According to the Washington Post, more than a dozen tax attorneys agree that "Treasury had no authority to issue the [tax change] notice."
Of equally dubious legality are the equity deals Treasury has negotiated with many of the country's banks. According to Congressman Barney Frank, one of the architects of the legislation that enables the deals, "Any use of these funds for any purpose other than lending -- for bonuses, for severance pay, for dividends, for acquisitions of other institutions, etc. -- is a violation of the act." Yet this is exactly how the funds are being used.
Then there is the nearly $2 trillion the Federal Reserve has handed out in emergency loans. Incredibly, the Fed will not reveal which corporations have received these loans or what it has accepted as collateral. Bloomberg News believes that this secrecy violates the law and has filed a federal suit demanding full disclosure.
Despite all of this potential lawlessness, the Democrats are either openly defending the administration or refusing to intervene. "There is only one president at a time," we hear from Barack Obama. That's true. But every sweetheart deal the lame-duck Bush administration makes threatens to hobble Obama's ability to make good on his promise of change. To cite just one example, that $140 billion in missing tax revenue is almost the same sum as Obama's renewable energy program. Obama owes it to the people who elected him to call this what it is: an attempt to undermine the electoral process by stealth.



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (4)
- reply
Kevinbailoutguru (not verified)at 19:38 on November 14th, 2008
The premise of the bailout was sound. It was meant to free up frozen credit markets that threatened our economy. I found a good on-going source of info on the bailout at:
http://www.thebailoutblog.com
at 21:58 on November 14th, 2008
Kevinbailoutguru; what's your evidence that the "premise" of the Wall Street Handout was actually to free up frozen credit markets? So far, the banks have been hoarding cash, going on junkets and gobbling up smaller corporations damaged in this meltdown the Republocrat's master's rigging of our free market system. The global derivatives market which has become the bulk of their wealth is at $50-60 trillion and is unwinding. It was an inherently unsustainable system to begin with; when money is based on debt and the game is structured so that interest has to be paid on it, the result is a perpetual spiral into debt- the game can be extended by refinancing until it starts to break apart and even the people at the top don't trust it anymore.
The dollar's value has declined by well over 90% since 1913 and the start of the Federal Reserve system, even as our economy has grown tremendously, thanks to human behavior and exponential technological evolution; no thanks to mismanagement by a selfish, short-sighted, greedy and corrupt "elite" class.
Our society is likely heading into another Great Depression; out of this is going to come a social conversation about the meaning of life and the value of human beings which will transform our understanding of the universe, economies and capitalism. Life and the Earth are worth more than dollars, which can't be eaten, lived in or worn, and whose magic is disappearing.
Do you know of any reason this system will not work? A far more efficient economic system is possible
Choose your words carefully, it's pretty obvious you're representing the status quo- and people read the blogs, you know; less than 20% of Americans trust the corporate media.
at 21:35 on November 14th, 2008
Good Post it is. However the bail out was a Democratic vote. Even though the Democratic system may need some major changes in order to be really democratic.
at 21:57 on November 14th, 2008
thanks Paschen- you're right, it was the treasonous Democrats (i'm registered Green, not active in the party) who were the majority vote in Congress that got the Bush Administration's Wall Street Bailout rammed thru; they loaded it up with perks and porks (the only good bit of lipstick on that pig was the inclusion of the renewable energy tax credits).
It certainly was not a "democratic" vote; it was overwhelmingly opposed by the American people on the left and right, and the values of Americans are not represented by many in Congress; most of those who succeed in getting the nomination of the Dems or the Reps are those who've been bought and paid for by corporations.
I think the Swiss have a good idea; representative government, with direct democratic oversight. It keeps the legislators from passing bad bills, as the People can override them
Switzerland's Direct Democracy