Navy Allows Women On Submarines In 2011

by Annina Bergman | October 6, 2009 at 01:55 pm
271 views | 17 Recommendations | 9 comments

Photos

USS Nautilus SSN-571

USS Nautilus SSN-571

see larger image

uploaded by shank27_2005

The United States Navy will let women serve on submarines starting in 2011. Female officers will start training for submarine duty next year, but will still not be allowed on attack submarines.

According to the Navy, women were not allowed to serve on submarines before due to the "limited habitability and privacy" aboard a submarine. But Secretary of the Navy, Ray Mabus, said he has been working together with Chief of Naval Operations Administrator Gary Roughead since March to allow women the same opportunity to serve on submarines as men have.

At first, women will be serving on larger ballistic- and guided missile submarines. The Navy will work on getting women on attack submarines in the future.

Women and men were segregated on all surface combat ships and aircraft until the early 1990s, but concerns about mixing women and men for long periods of time under water in closed quarters has kept women off submarines. There is only one lavatory on most submarines, and Gary Roughead suggested the Navy may have to implement time-sharing agreements when it comes to using setting up a system to use them with two sexes on the boat.

"We are moving out aggressively on this. I believe women should have every opportunity to serve at sea, and that includes aboard submarines."
recommend Add a comment
0
Hugh Askew

Wonder if they will top the pregnancy rate on the aircraft carriers?

0
sara star

I did not know they couldn't.

0
Annina Bergman

I didn't know it either! But apparently soon they can.

0
Hugh Askew

And soon, 20% of them that do, will become pregnant.

1
PregnancyCorner

They should read my Top 10 Reasons NOT to get Pregnant story before they board the sub. LOL...otherwise, it's going to be a long leave!

0
Hugh Askew

Yup, they get a year of shore leave...pretty rugged.

I've been thru four pregnancies with my wife....they're kinda-sorta fun, till her feet start hurting. And labor? HORRORS!

1
Anonymous Submariner

As US submariner who has served on a submarine with women and several 688's without, certain things will happen generally speaking:
1. overall the crew comradrie will go down b/c men and women just don't bond in the same way and it will cause divisions
2. the "time-sharing" solution will be a pain in the ass for everyone, especially the enlisted crew and the officers on the same watch rotation as the women
3. romantic issues statistically will be a small problem but will be blown out of proportion for a long time to come and I will feel sorry the first poor bastard to accidently say the wrong thing and have his career ruined as an example.
4. many details will be overlooked by those implementing the policies b/c they have not served on submarines ever or it was so long ago the memory of the extremes endured has faded. Those details will have to be supplied by individual commands adding yet another paperwork and manpower requirement for overworked crews to deal with
5. Lastly, damn the woman who gets pregnant on a submarine able to be deployed and to hell with any women's libber who thinks that's the wrong thing to say.

0
wife of a submariner

I absolutly agree with everything you said here. There are some things in life women don't need to be apart of, this is one of them. It is crap to say that everything between women and men should be equal, it never has been and never will....get OVER it girls, and I really think after spending 6-9 months in such close quarters with so many smelly men, might make them change thier minds! This is a bad idea, and I hope that it never actually happens!!!! All of these liberal women need to get over themselves!

0
Babel-Fish

Why not have submarines for women only and ones for men only oh yes and ones for gays only. That one toilet and the pregnancy problem is then surmounted.

Then of course there's the problem of the submarines name we must be politically correct, lol

The men's could remain as they are. 

The name of the women only subs would need to be changed using famous women politicians such as "Hilary Clinton".  

The name the gays subs kind of flummoxes me perhaps some suggestions from those that know gay US politicians can help?

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

smkovalinsky
First Flagged at 2:05 PM, Oct 6, 2009 by smkovalinsky
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (17)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from