NDP will not expand the Port Mann Bridge

by eastvanray | April 14, 2009 at 05:04 pm
226 views | 2 Recommendations | 7 comments

Photos

A title here is required | Photo 418

A title here is required | Photo 418

see larger image

uploaded by eastvanray

According to the NDP, the Port Mann Bridge will not be expanded under an NDP Goverment, leaving commuters and truckers many hours per day to reconsider their vote and the possible election outcome.


 

NDP MLA Says Port Mann to be Put On Hold

April 14, 2009


SURREY –Cariboo South NDP candidate Charlie Wyse has confirmed Carole James and the NDP’s true intentions towards the Port Mann Bridge – they have no plans to build it.

“It’s completely dishonest for the NDP to say one thing in Surrey and another in the north,” says Surrey-Cloverdale BC Liberal candidate Kevin Falcon.  “Carole James and the Surrey NDP have never supported the bridge. Carole James said it was the ‘wrong bridge, the wrong time.’ Her transportation critic rejected the 8,000 jobs that will be created by building a new bridge. It’s only recently they’ve experienced a conversion on the road to the Port Mann and paid lip service to the project. Now we know they were being dishonest and they have no plans to build the bridge.  This is a project that needs to be built and we’re going to make it happen."

As reported by the Williams Lake Tribune, during his nomination meeting, Wyse confirmed the NDP’s position:  “that the $3.1 billion expenditure for the Port Mann Bridge should not be a provincial commitment at this time.”
Also on Page 55 of the NDP platform, it clearly outlines the party’s plans to cancel previously announced capital projects. However, the NDP refuse to detail what projects will be eliminated.

“Everyone who drives along Highway One, whether north or south of the Fraser, understands the need for a new Port Mann Bridge except the NDP,” says Surrey-Fleetwood BC Liberal candidate Jagmohan Singh. “This bridge will create thousands of jobs, reduce travel times by up to 30 per cent and will allow buses to cross the Port Mann for the first time in 20 years. I’m calling on NDP candidate Jagrup Brar to stand up for his constituents and tell his leader to stop the dishonesty and admit they plan to cancel the bridge.”

The Port Mann/Highway 1 project consists of the construction of a new 10-lane Port Mann Bridge and widening Highway 1, upgrading interchanges and improving access and safety from McGill Street in Vancouver to 216th Street in Langley, a distance of approximately 37 km.


 

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
albertacowpoke

It seems right now would be a perfect time to build this bridge. It sounds to me like it is  a so called shovel ready project.

The double talk of the NDP doesn.t surprise me though. 

0
WestCoast TreeHugger

Expanding transit infrastructure creates 3 times as many jobs as highway expansion (Conference Board of BC figures).  It seems to me like it is the right time to expand transit not freeways.

1
steffanileman

I think she was right. The wrong bridge at the wrong time.

Reminds me of "A Bridge Too Far."

0
eastvanray

Try commuting from Vancouver to Surrey and back.  And why do you spout reactionary NDP slogans?  What is wrong with the design of the bridge and how bad does the gridlock have to get for you to recognize that it is time?  By then it will be the right bridge but years too late.

0
WestCoast TreeHugger

Highway expansion projects almost never reduce congestion or  commuting times.  That is the problem with the design of this project.  Dozens of urban planners, transportation experts and academics have pointed this out. 

A better option would be to invest more money in mass transit which can move people more efficiently and cost effectively with less localize pollution and ghg emissions.

0
eastvanray

So you are saing that congestion would be exactly the same had we never built the Alex Fraser Bridge, the East-West Connector or widened HWY1?  I think your statement does not pass even the most basic of sniff tests. 

0
WestCoast TreeHugger

Most of us live in the real world and look at real world evidence - not "sniff tests" (whatever that is).  There is plenty of real world evidence that highway expansion projects rarely relieve congestion. see:

http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/008957.html
http://www.walkablestreets.com/triple.htm
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3734/is_200104/ai_n8946106/

Do you really believe that mass transit would not be a more efficient, more cost effective and less polluting way of moving commuters?

Do you really believe that we can meet our ghg emission reduction targets while increasing capacity for the sector that generates the largest emissions?

Can you give one recent example of a city that has reduced congestion by expanding highways?

(Gordon Price has asked the last question many times and so far no one has come forward to answer it)

0
EV

fuck transit i like my car i wouldnt give it up for a faggy train or bus ride

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

albertacowpoke
First Flagged at 5:18 PM, Apr 14, 2009 by albertacowpoke
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (2)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from