NP Rank:
New police guidelines and questions re safety of Tasers
Taser International company which makes stun guns used by US Police forces hints at chances of cardiac arrest, and issues new guidelines.
Although tasers certainly are a help to police, they can be misused, have hidden dangers, and raise questions of civil liberties for many.
PHOENIX — Stun-gun maker Taser International has started telling police agencies to avoid firing the devices at suspects' chests, explaining that there's an "extremely low" risk of ill effects on the heart and that doing so will make defending lawsuits easier.The Scottsdale, Ariz.-based company made the recommendation in an Oct. 12 revised training manual, saying it "has less to do with safety and more to do with effective risk management for law enforcement agencies."
The manual also includes a lengthy explanation about deaths caused by sudden cardiac arrest.
"Should sudden cardiac arrest occur in a scenario involving a Taser discharge to the chest area, it would place the law enforcement agency, the officer, and Taser International in the difficult situation of trying to ascertain what role, if any, (the device) could have played," according to the manual.
The manual includes a graphic displaying the human body and "preferred target areas." The company recommends firing Tasers anywhere but at the head, neck and chest. The manual says to avoid chest shots "when possible" and "unless legally justified."
Taser critics call the company's new recommendation an admission that the devices can cause heart attacks.
"It's a sea change, a passive acknowledgment that Taser has indeed been overconfident about its claims of safety," said Mark Silverstein, legal director of the ACLU of Colorado. "It underscores the question marks that have been adding up along with hundreds of bodies."
Amnesty International says more than 350 people in the U.S. died after they were shocked with Tasers, and that in 50 of those cases, medical examiners cited a link between Taser shocks and death.
Taser officials say the new recommendation is designed only to "avoid any potential controversy on this topic."
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
Susan Marie Kovalinsky
Ledgewood, New Jersey, United States
Recommendations (32)
-
Frank Liao
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
a211423
Clearlake, California, United States



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (6)
at 20:26 on October 21st, 2009
Thanks for this, smk! It's about time they have issued new guidelines. The fact remains, however, that its use can be deadly.
at 20:24 on October 21st, 2009
Nevertheless, its obvious whose side they are on:
"Stun-gun maker Taser International has started telling police agencies to avoid firing the devices at suspects' chests, explaining that there's an "extremely low" risk of ill effects on the heart and that doing so will make defending lawsuits easier."
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Jorge Gonzalez (not verified)at 18:50 on October 30th, 2009
The problems with the Taser are well known but the company's hype that it is safe is swallowed hook-line-and-sinker by most law enforcement agencies. They promote it not as a safer alternative to the use of a deadly firearm in a life-threatening situation, but as a "non-lethal" tool that can replace a baton, an asp, chemical spray, pain compliance holds, and any other medium level uses of force just higher on the continuum than verbal orders. The consequence is the Taser is widely used to punish suspects into compliance with severe pain. Merely tell a cop to fuck off and he is liable to electricute you into submission, and the department will find its use in policy. This is part of a larger trend to stop hands on policing, its lazy, its evil, and it has to be stopped.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
film izle (not verified)at 19:01 on October 30th, 2009
thank you daha ne diim
at 19:03 on October 30th, 2009
"Merely tell a cop to fuck off and he is liable to electricute you into submission, and the department will find its use in policy. This is part of a larger trend to stop hands on policing, its lazy, its evil, and it has to be stopped."
I agree, Jorge! :(