NP Rank:
New York State Mom of Gay Teen Heads to State Court of Appeals
NIAGARA COUNTY, NY, May 28, 2010 --
New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department declined responsibility and accountability once again when it decided upon The Matter of Rhonda Mangus v Niagara County Department of Social Services and New York State Office of Children and Family Services.
In a one-line Memorandum and Order - without comment from Justices Martoche, Smith, Fahey, and Carni - the ruling leaves in place an illegal and egregious finding by Niagara County Department of Social Services and New York State Office of Children and Family Services who indicated Mangus for Educational Neglect in 2007.
The motions are in response to an Article 78 proceeding held before the Appellate Court last year that sought relief from the second alleged finding of 'educational neglect' against Mangus: The first report filed by North Tonawanda High School Principal James V. Fisher for educational neglect in 2006 was 'unfounded'.
Mangus failed to get the second finding reversed even though the facts of the case show Mangus' son had been excused from compulsory attendance by two medical professionals and that New York State Office of Children and Family Services violated Mangus' due process rights at a 2008 NYS OCFS Administrative Hearing held before Judge Jean Greinert in Niagara Falls, NY when they failed to advise and obtain, on the record, an intelligent or understanding waiver of the Appellant right to be afforded the opportunity of counsel.
Mangus' son Michael, who is now 18 years of age, was removed from North Tonawanda High School in 2005 for the reason of escalating violence against the then 14 year old who was subject to repeated harassment and bullying, culminating in an expletive-laden death threat against him based on his sexual orientation and gender expression.
Mangus maintains City of North Tonawanda School District failed to provide a safe environment for her child to learn, school officials disagreed. The author of the death threat was never found according to North Tonawanda High school officials and North Tonawanda Police.
Counsel for New York State Office of Children and Family Services, Zainab A. Chaudhry, of Counsel for New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's Office, opposed the motions on the grounds that Mangus failed to establish that the Court overlooked or misapprehended the relevant facts or misapplied any controlling principle of law, nor did the case present issues that are novel or of public importance.
Mangus, who proceeded pro se on the matter, was advised by high-profile Chicago attorney Jay Paul Deratany and his associate Nathan Polum. The two gave Mangus their expert advisement on a pro bono basis. Deratany is a politician, human rights activist, and successful personal injury attorney specializing in birth injuries, and has won multi-million dollar settlement awards for clients in Cook County. He is also a playwright: His human rights play "Haram Iran" has been produced for the Chicago and Los Angeles theater districts, and has received global praise; from Washington, DC's Campaign for Human Rights and London's gay advocacy forums.
The Mangus matter is now pending an order, granting leave to appeal, to the Court of Appeals; New York State.
(Ref. Niagara County
County Clerk Index No. 136504
Appellate Division Docket No.: TP0901245)
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
Susan Marie Kovalinsky
Ledgewood, New Jersey, United States
Recommendations (23)
-
Karen Hatter
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States -
stejeb
United Kingdom 
Anonymous user
-
Rory Cripps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada -
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke
Redwater, Alberta, Canada -
Spydermonkey
huntsville, Alabama, United States






Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (8)
at 04:59 on May 28th, 2010
Kind of makes you wonder what they do consider of public importance doesn't it?
Thanks for the update Susan.
at 05:24 on May 28th, 2010
Yes, truly--thanks so much, Steve : )
at 06:12 on May 28th, 2010
I am certainly sorry to see that Rhonda is still dealing with this horrible case of injustice by New York authorities. Did they want the son to commit suicide, is that what it takes for them to wake up and get away from their desk?
Two professionals recommend that to her and she is wrong? All I can say is that this is a complete miscarriage of justice.
Thanks for the update.
at 06:54 on May 28th, 2010
Yes, I agree Karl. This press release has been picked up by the Gay Media Network and will be distributed nationally, online and on radio, so I am glad Rhonda will get the attention she needs. Her son's life was threatened, and he was bullied, all for being gay. TWO medical professionals advised her. Yet they have pinned it all on her. Outrageous!!! Thanks for your input, Rhonda will greatly appreciate it.
at 08:08 on May 28th, 2010
Thanks so much for that, Pete; it is a huge help to Rhonda and her son to hear people voice their support!
at 09:13 on May 28th, 2010
I am straight not gay, I am angry that any child should or would have to suffer abuse of any kind at school and not have the love and support of adults to protect them.
at 09:21 on May 28th, 2010
The authorities and courts are all covering their pathetic asses on this one it appears. Sometimes the only way to prevent bullying and get justice is to go out into the dead of night and take the law into one's own hands. Rhonda's son was being bullied and threatened and apparently no one other than Rhonda stuck up for him. That's a real shame.
What happened in Rhonda's and her son's case is something that's happening throughout the country. Namely, the guilty are getting away with a lot of shit at the expense of the innocent . . . .
at 09:43 on May 28th, 2010
Thanks jkelaigle and
thanks Rory.
Yes, it is not fair, and NY State is not making itself very likable with their attitude. Your comments are most appreciated.