NP Rank:
Newt Gingrich: Instability or Hypocrisy?
In a recent TV appearance, Newt Gingrich had a fall and had to be taken to the hospital after someone asked him if he was stable enough to be US President.
Normally, I would never say anything about something like that. However we are dealing with Republicans, who have a time-honored habit of maliciously attacking anyone whom they perceive as having any kind of emotional disturbance. So it would be rightful to treat Mr. Gingrich in this situation in the same way as Republicans like to treat everyone else in situations where any such a thing is suspected. Indeed it would be only fair.
It should not be forgotten that during 1988 election, there was a feeding frenzy about whether or not Democratic candidate Michael Dukakis had ever seen a psychiatrist. There was a Republican politician in the New England area who recently stated that people with mental illness should be exiled to Siberia. Another high-profiled case is Rush Limbaugh, who shouted for a long time about drug addicts until he became one himself.
I am reminded of how many people shouted about Clinton's one-time use of marijuana, but said nothing about Bush's habitual use of cocaine. I am reminded of how many people shouted about Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinski, yet said nothing about Newt Gingrich leaving his wife at her deathbed to marry another woman or about Ronald Reagan having been married two times. I am reminded about how many people claimed that Clinton lying to the court about a consensual sex act was sullying or weakening to American government, but having nothing similar to say about Bush lying to get America into a war.
The problem with Newt Gingrich is not his instability; it is his hypocrisy. He wants to impose upon America what he claims to be "traditional family values"; meanwhile he himself had divorced a wife who was dying of cancer in order to marry another woman.
So yes, laugh at him, call him a loony, say that he is weak and that he has no character. He and his followers would do much worse things to you if you had a similar experience.


Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (3)
at 07:52 on December 22nd, 2011
I am trying to find out more about Newt Gingrich. I believe that Newt Gingrich is very interesting {maybe defining} figure in contemporary American politics. He is republican and conservative, yet has some personal issues which do not fit in conservative, puritan boxes. Hypocrisy is not a good thing, yet it does not rule out the possibility, that someone can become a brilliant politician. Newt was not born as an illegitimate child but nevertheless he never knew his biological father. The name Gingrich was adopted. Gingrich was the second husband of his mom. Despite this handicap he climbed to the political peak. He is older than most candidates, lacks energy of younger candidates yet he posess experience, eloquence and tactic. We shall know more after super Tuesday. we can say one thing for sure- Romney is too rich and too agressive and Ron Paul is a racist and creates false conspiracu theories. If Newt G. wins the nomination- the debate between him and Barack Obama would be fascinating.
at 16:26 on December 22nd, 2011
"
"Newt was not born as an illegitimate child but nevertheless he never knew his biological father. The name Gingrich was adopted. Gingrich was the second husband of his mom. Despite this handicap he climbed to the political peak."
Obama was raised by a single mother, and he has climbed higher than Gingrich. It may not be such a handicap. The only real problem with being raised in such settings is how one gets treated by people who are socially conservative, and it has nothing to do with the setting itself.
"we can say one thing for sure- Romney is too rich and too agressive and Ron Paul is a racist and creates false conspiracu theories"
Ron Paul reminds me a bit of Ross Perot. A fascinating third-way person with lots of appeal. He has however consistently opposed rights for women, and people don't realize that as they listen to his Federal Reserve stuff.
"If Newt G. wins the nomination- the debate between him and Barack Obama would be fascinating."
Gingrich thinks that Obama is possessed by a ghost of his father. These two would tear each other to bits.
at 16:37 on December 23rd, 2011
thanks for quoting some of my sentences. I see you are journalistically well equipped :) now to the topics- I feel pretty well informed so I can state that senator Paul has some racist or semi-racist and backward going ideas. he does not fascinate me a bit and his perspective of todays world is inaccurate to say it politely. to say that his remarks about US. foreign policy are stupid would be impolite.. I knew some of his supporters in my hometown-one austrian, one south african white one american- all with quite sick ideas. Ross Perot was a true Texas patriot who understood foreign affairs.. Yes Obama climbed higher than Gingrich. thats right. You did not mention all the aspects that played in his favor though. like good looks, well defined slogans, pro-PR team, sympathy of not just american but world intellectual elite, etc... I still feel as an Obama person, but I would like to see a good competition. Gingrich and Obama because of their backgrounds would make perfect rivals on the path to White house.