No Apology from Bill Kristol about WMD Lies to Invade Iraq

by TheCameraObscura | March 29, 2009 at 05:42 pm
89 views | 0 Recommendations | 1 comment

Photos

Bill Kristol

Bill Kristol

see larger image

uploaded by TheCameraObscura

When the Weekly Standard’s Bill Kristol appeared on C-SPAN’s Washington Journal, a caller criticized his publication for hyping President Bush’s pre-invasion lies about WMD in Iraq, and asked him to apologize to the American public. Kristol refused, saying that the war has been a smashing success.

CALLER: All of y’all hyped that to a degree that was just unimaginable. Even President Bush admitted there were no weapons of mass destruction there. In lieu of that fact — being the fact that there are 4,500 American lives lost there — will you personally apologize to those folks right now? Simple yes or no. Thank you.

KRISTOL: No. I think the war was right, and I think we’ve succeeded in the war. And I think those lives — we should honor those soldiers who gave their lives and who fought so hard, and also were wounded for what they did.

What is the reason for Kristol's blatant arrogance?

Well, on Rachel Maddow’s show, the Wonk Room’s Matt Duss discussed the emergence of the Foreign Policy Institute, the seeming new shelter for disgraced neoconservative foreign policy “experts.” Maddow asked Duss how is it that the architects of the Iraq failure are able to reconstitute themselves:

MADDOW: Here’s the thing I don’t understand about DC and national security policy: Why is it that people who are catastrophically wrong about big important things like foreign policy and war never, like, flunk out of that as a subject? It doesn’t affect our judgment of them apparently at all for the next things they want to do.

DUSS: I think that’s a great question, Rachel. I ask myself that question all the time. There seems to be this special dispensation in American foreign policy that, as long as you are wrong on the side of more military force, then all is forgiven. … As long as you make these errors in favor of more military action, then eventually you’re forgiven and allowed back in the conversation. And everyone just forgets about it.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Floyd D Bellinger

I agree with Ms Maddow.  Why is it, they always excuse Mr Bush's mistakes like the Iraq war?  Why is it so easy for the apologists to go from a clear and present danger to, "He was a bad man."  "He gassed his people (Kurds)."  "He needed to be removed BEFORE he got the weapons we thought he ALREADY had."  Such a joke.  If he had those weapons, so too would the ALQ that Bush said was connected to Sadaam.  So too would OBL and his people in Afghanistan.  Nothing connects with the lies used. Even Mr Powell regretted his part in this.  How is it, no matter what is identified as a failure with Mr Bush, someone tries to discount it.

Terms like, the world is safer.  The Middle East is safer.  But look at the world.  Iran has increased its nuclear threat.  So too has N Korea.  The American economy is in shambles. What happened to all the, "Syria has the WMD, now talk?"  What happened to the, "We know where they (WMD) are, they are in Tikirit talk?" They have the very STUFF Bush was said to have looked for in Iraq.  The apologists need to get over the BS (Bush Spins) and admit their wrongs

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from