Nobel Peace Prize winner kills US Dollar

by PIM of SPAIN | October 10, 2009 at 05:38 am
1603 views | 48 Recommendations | 29 comments

Photos

The US Dollar is Killed | Photo 02

The US Dollar is Killed | Photo 02

see larger image

uploaded by PIM of SPAIN

Ironically the winner of this year’s Nobel Price for the Peace, Barack Obama also had a totally different mission in mind; killing the US dollar.  Of course, Obama and his financial ministers will always say: “America has a strong dollar policy.”
However measured in Euros - a more stable ruler than the ever-weakening dollar -, U.S. real per capita GDP is down 25% since 2000, while Germany's is up 4% and tops that of the U.S.

The questions are: Is expanding the Fed’s balance sheet by $1.4 trillion a strong dollar policy? Is a $15 trillion national debt a strong dollar policy? How about record budget and trade deficits – are those things that make up a strong dollar? Certainly not, that’s why last night, the dollar index - which tracks the dollar versus a basket of six major currencies - fell to a 14-month low of 75.78.

Mid-term elections are about a year away. And Obama and the congressional Democrats are looking for a way to hold on to their grand majority in 2010. Democrats recognize the tide is turning against them. A “secret job plan” has been developed to save Election Day. The Democrats want to keep the dollar cheap to get back manufacturing jobs from abroad. The reasoning is: An employed electorate is a happy electorate. MIT’s economic professor Simon Johnson explains why the buck will continue to fall and drown.

“Think what a weaker dollar does for the industrial heartland, where so many congressional seats will be in play and where today it’s easier to export or compete against imports because the same dollar costs convert into fewer Euros, yen, or renminbi (this is what a “weaker” dollar means—foreigners can more easily afford our goods and their stuff is more expensive to us). If the dollar stays weak or declines further, our car companies, machinery makers, and turbine blade manufacturers will soon be rehiring and we’ll finally get some job growth as part of our sputtering economic recovery.”

This plan will not work. If history is any indicator, it will fail miserably. David Malpass of Encima Global explains in the WSJ why this plan is a disaster in waiting:

“Some weak-dollar advocates believe that American workers will eventually get cheap enough in foreign-currency terms to win manufacturing jobs back. In practice, however, capital outflows overwhelm the trade flows, causing more job losses than cheap real wages create. This was the lesson of the British malaise, the Carter malaise, the Mexican malaise of the 1990s, Yeltsin's Russian malaise through 1999 and the rest. No countries have devalued their way into prosperity, while many—Hong Kong, China, Australia today—have used stable money to invite capital and jobs.

      The more the dollar devalued against the yen in the 1970s and '80s, the more Japan gained share in valued-added manufacturing, using the capital from weak-currency countries to increase productivity. China is doing the same now. It watches in chagrin as the U.S. pleads with it to strengthen the Yuan, adding productivity fast with the dollars rushing its way in search of currency stability.”

If a cheap dollar won’t create jobs and the dollar lose buying power, who will benefit? The bankers on Wall Street and America’s large corporations overseas branches, of course.

With access to the Fed’s discount window, the zombie banks make a killing off the new dollar carry trade. And large corporations borrow cheaply to expand overseas operations.

If the banks and corporations are happy, everyone should be happy too? Wrong. Again David Malpass explains why all are worse off due to Obama’s cheap dollar policy.

“If stocks double but the dollar loses half its value, who beyond Wall Street are the winners and losers? There's been a clear demonstration this decade. The S&P nearly doubled from 2003 through 2007. Those who borrowed to buy won big-time. Rich people got richer, seeing their equity bottom line double. At the same time, the dollar's value was cut nearly in half versus the euro and other stable measures. Capital fled, undercutting job growth. Rent, gasoline and food prices rose more than wages.

Equity gains provide cold comfort when currencies crash. From the euro perspective, the S&P peaked at 1700 in 2000, finally retained 1100 in the 2007 bubble, fell below 600 in March and now stands at 700. With most of the market capitalization of U.S. stocks held by Americans, the dollar devaluation has caused a massive decline in the U.S. share of global wealth.”

This is pretty shocking news, as mentioned in the opening words: ‘In a stable currency, US GDP is down 25% over the past nine years.’ It was thought that the US had an era of prosperity squeezed in between the dot COM and real estate busts. But that is an illusion.

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
2
Hugh Askew

Good article, PIM.  Scary, tho.

It would be nice if the "mainstream" moguls would realize that us little people need to know this kind of stuff.


2
Babel-Fish

The dollar was weak when Obama took over and there was and there is little that can be done about it its certainly not been engineered by the democratic government its been geared by Americans living high on the hog whilst having too much on credit. We are talking plastic money and jello.

Yes devaluing the dollar will not make jobs but how can you devalue something that is already weak?  The world is becoming weary of the bad US economy supporting the world currency exchange. I really hope that another more reliable currency is used if not USA will drag the worlds economy down each time its slumps on its journey of self ruin.

You can not just keep on printing money to keep an real bad economy stable and there is nothing Obama can do to stop the dollar devaluing other than printing more money. In the end we would see the same effect that happened in Germany pre war or in Zimbabwe a few years ago. Money that has no value what so ever. Obama can not wave a magic wand but the world can change the currency exchange system. I believe we are seeing the beginning of that process now.

USA Global wealth is only a paper dragon propped up by the dragon, China and other wealthy nations. No the dollar was dead prior to Obama's takeover he has now only one path to take devaluation to a more realistic and honest value. 

 

     


2
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

The Canadian dollar was  worth about 83c U.S, when Obama took over it is now running at 95c and is expected to be par by year's end.  The administration, as such, doesn.t have much control of the value of the dollar.  Most of the monetary decisions are made by the Fed.  Congress piling up a deficit in Trillions, of course, doesn't help.

3
PIM of SPAIN


Scary and shocking as you and I wrote, little people have to know about, which is the reason I keep myself alert on this kind of developments. Not recently but already for over two decades. What ever the kind of the 'wake up call' is, authorities in charge don't listen and have their own agenda. It is not a matter of right or left wing both have committed the same suicidal process. It shouldn't have been comitted, but politics in general is geared to win the voters on their site, and consequently they promise free lunches that don't exist.

Devaluing the dollars is killing the dollar for which a peace price is offered. It should have been the other way round. But now the (value of) Nobel Peace Price has been devalued too.

Indeed the Canadian Dollar's increase in value like the Euro's are good examples to show the US$ devaluation's progress. The problem is that the US Dollar is the world's only reserve currencies, which in fact means that the US Government is irresponsibly misusing their authority for selfish interest in trying to bend the wrong into worst, by letting to suffer the rest of the world, culminating is a draconian lack of confidence at all levels of society!

3
Hugh Askew

"But now the (value of) Nobel Peace Price has been devalued too."

GREAT line.

2
Shepard Night

"But now the (value of) Nobel Peace Price has been devalued too."Actually the Nobel Peace Prize cash payment is higher because it's paid in Swedish Kroner which is at an all time high against the dollar.  :) 

0
nanute

Much to digest here, PIM. As you've rightly pointed out, the winners here once again are the banks and their overseas affiliates.Unfortunately, this might be part of the solution to the current crisis. Strengthening the banking and financial markets is a necessary evil right now. Furthermore, the weak currency has the effect of giving more capital to the banks, without directly doing so, through expanding money supply. (I think.)

In normal times weak currencies generally lead to inflation, because a country is able to by more imported goods, driving up consumer spending. As everyone with a brain knows, US and by extension most developed countries are not in a consumption mode. Unemployment and housing devaluations have got average consumers reeling. Furthermore, generally speaking, weak currencies devalues debt currently outstanding. Notice that Asian countries intervened to prop ut the dollar just yesterday. see this link for additional input on this point. http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/10/asian-countries-intervene-to-prop-up-greenback-dollar-bind-edition.html The flip side of cheaper cost of current debt service via the weak dollar is it makes future borrowing more costly.

If interest rates start rising too soon, it will devastate the already on life support, residential housing markets. And, we're expecting fallout in the commercial real estate markets to materialize any day now.

I'm not an economist, and don't propose to know what the answers are to this current crisis. But I'm pretty sure that raising interest rates, and strengthening the dollar right now, is a recipe for disaster.



0
Babel-Fish

Your spot on. its best not to change the status quo the dollar has to hit its real value and not be tampered with.   

2
marianmo

i disagree, you can not in all honesty blame everything on obama....blame the govt bureaucrats, international finance.......but pleeeeasssssseeeee take a breather...

0
PIM of SPAIN

Shepard what is meant the moral value, although you are right in terms of money. But Nobel price Laureates's value carry more that the material value!

1
PIM of SPAIN

Mariano only the ones are blamed that are in charge and have been is charge, left or right doesn't matter. In the posting is clearly explained where and how it went wrong. B&B = Ben and Barack are in charge now, Ben before with George Bush and Alan Greenspan before Ben, who is the designer of this all mess. There is no blame made at all. It is factual explained and reported.



1
PIM of SPAIN

Nanute yr analysis is correct however the US Dollar is the world's reserve currency and that makes a big difference. Of course the US want tu inflate their currency to reduce the original value of their debt, but wait a minute: How long will China and Japan as the largest debtors -that lent the US Government their money- tolerate this process? The moment China and or Japan quit the financial world is in turmoil! Very 'Scary' as Hugh concluded above.

0
Babel-Fish

That shows that you do not understand China that well. China has to rely on the world as the world has to rely on China until the world can manufacture more goods at home. China has to much investment abroad to hop out of the financial market. Japan has also to much investment abroad to follow such a silly path as your suggesting.

China is pushing for a multi-sovereign currency exchange system and so are other rich nations at present the world hangs on what is happening with the US$ of which is lost much of its power and strength the US economy drags down the world. It does make sense to have a multi-sovereign currency exchange system a so call World$.

 

0
nanute

Pim,

China isn't blameless here. They seek the best of both worlds. Pegging their currency to the dollar, but not permitting the currency to float. If China wants a stronger dollar it can purchase more. Taiwan Singapor and Malaysia  did just that yesterday, as I noted in my previous post.

The question is whether the inflationary pressure on the currency will have a positive or negative impact on the US economy. If my analysis is correct, I think it is a positive effect. Maybe not for European countries and China in the near term, but long term maybe so. The process is painful, and some feel that the US created this mess and should be responsible for paying for it. Contrary to what some may think, believe me, we are paying for it.

We the US), can't import our way out of this mess. You noted the decline in US GDP since 2000 is 25%, while Germany's is only down 4%. Is it any wonder? Approximately 2/3rds of the US economy is based on consumer spending. What's the equivalent in Germany? And how much does Germany spend on defense?

2
PIM of SPAIN

Yes Roy China is predatory correct, but the Chinese like the Japanese have limited patience with US. The day one of those discover the US is lying to guard the value of the US currency, as it does, since you posted an article about Gheitner lying as I did, the party is over. The Chinese so far spend their US Dollars by buying everything they can buy, even land in Africa. Just to minimize their lost. For the moment they are in the boat and have to follow, but that could change overnight in the not too distant future. The Obama Government is at the moment trying to find the limits, but Chinese patience is almost worn out, better to count with that.

1
Babel-Fish

I can not see the evidence that Chinese patience has worn out its concentrated more on its home market place. In fact they are buying their future as a more powerful world power investing abroad gives them a power over foreign governments, it switches power control from USA and Europe to China. That has nothing to do with re-cooperating losses its part of the global chess game. China is doing well still whilst the world is suffering losses due to the finacial problems caused by the USA.   

China has a load of patience they can afford to have and if they get their way a multi-soveriegn based exchange currency will be created within the next 5 years or so.

China was used for its cheap labor and turn the tail by becoming preditory, look this was business and the chinese are good at business. They are also good at gambling so far the gamble has worked well for them and they are not pulling the chips off the table. The dragon is smiling  

0
PIM of SPAIN

To give you an idea Roy: China has about 2 trillion US$ in assest (cash and treasures) and Japan 1 trillion US$.

There is no way to deleverage this quantity of debt (paying down through -export- earned US$ and not inflated ones!) by the US in a short period of time. Oil might be traded in Euros or other currencies, but that requires a political hassle. Russia intended it, about a year ago, but was not successful. Eventually this will happen sooner than later, when the US economy and the US Dollar are on its knees. The only way to make proper energy saving by not importing oil from abroad is nuclear energy generation like France does. Followed by coal conversion into synthetic fuel that both is CO2 emission free process and when burned.


0
Babel-Fish

What about solar and thermal power, there are big problems with Atomic energy and that's the waste where do you want that dumped in your back yard. lol

Hey and what happens when USA has its first atomic powers station melt down?  And who wants a power station in their neighborhood?  Nuclear power stations are not the answer to the world energy problems their are much safer and cheaper and non polutant ways of making energy. USA has already started adapting many of its powerstations to mirror based solar power thats part of a sensible way forward.  

1
The_Cynic

Why the hell in a time of global recession would you want a high dollar? For Christ's sake - it is the demand that you want to increase!

Supply-side has fallen flat on its face and still the idiot GOPers want to reinvent the supply-side.

Demand is the factor in stability.


1
PIM of SPAIN

Roy and Nanute the Chinese are committing the same mistakes of the West, they have built factories that already are obsolete and idle. These loans are not being paid back. The Chinese government implemented a stimulus package of $500 billion to increase local consumption that didn't materialize. The money went into the stock market like in the West. The bust in China is going to happen according to Mark Faber the China specialist. It's not a matter of if, but when. The Chinese are not going to consume more and will stick to their 25% savings rate for the foreseeable future. Don't bet on China to make money.

1
PIM of SPAIN

The_Cynic you are wrong. Inflating thus lowering the value of the US dollar, has severe consequences for people with savings and living from a pension. It make stuff cheaper for export, but it will not create more consumption since there still  are ca. 10% jobless people on the dole. The supply-side theory only works in a growing economy not in a degrading one. Creative destruction is the answer, which already is taking place see GM etc. The process will take time, 5 - 10 - 15 years you will witness it.

3
Hugh Askew

The "creative destruction" would have taken much less time - 2 or 3 years - had Bush AND Obama kept their noses out of private enterprise, and their funny money in their pockets.  It would have undoubtedly been extremely sharp and brutal, but the bad money loans and bad investments would be gone by now. As it is, we have borrowed to transfer our future "wealth", to the folks that made the bad choices, that caused the mess.

Can't help but wonder what will happen if the world's economy, or this economy, is hit with an unexpected disaster.   If China decides the time is right to invade Taiwan, if the US or Israel bombs Iran's nuke facilities, if Our Dear Leader v1.2 nukes Seoul, what happens then?

1
nanute

The "creative destruction" would have taken much less time... That is a pretty big assumption, Hugh. The ensuing fall out from this approach would make the Great Depression look like a Sunday picnic. If you liked the Great Depression, you will love version 2.0 if central banks and governments withdraw.

I'm sorry, but as much as you dislike the current resident of the White House, he isn't Herbert Hoover. (Thank god.) I've expressed my displeasure with certain aspects of the administration and by extension, the Fed with regard to the current intervention. Nevertheless, the notion that the "free market" will sort it out without any intervention by government is dangerous wishful thinking.

0
The_Cynic

How am I wrong, Pim?

The domestic dollar value is inconsequential at this time. The lower dollar value means that more exports can be delivered AND produced in the US. The productivity equation also comes into this but that is for another post.

Supply-side was never, and never will be the answer just for what you have said - it's great in an ever-increasing economy, great if the domestic economy does fine, yet it falls flat once a down-turn comes.

A lower dollar means more jobs because the producers need employees - unless, like is about to happen - those producers produce outside the US.

Again, the economy should be based on demand and not supply!

"Creative destruction" in layman's terms is called innovation of the market - it is nothing at all new - :read industrial revolution.

1
nanute

PIM,

It is high time for the developing, and emerging market economies to become the new consumers of the world. US consumers are in no position to lead the way in consumption. If demand (consumption) is down while the dollar inflates, there is a possibility that prices for goods and services will hold constant, and may actually decline. (There is that pesky deflation concern again.)

Here's another take on what's causing the global financial crisis and what needs doing to "fix" it. The basic argument is that until excess global liquidity is addressed, the problem(s) will continue.   "Global Imbalances and the Financial Crisis: Products of Common Causes" 

1
PIM of SPAIN

Nanute thanks for yr comment. At this moment of time there is no fix left anymore. Creative destruction is the only route to go, the world has too much of everything, and these excesses have got to be eliminated, before any improvement can be made or expected. The developing world is not able to pick up the slack in the global overproduction, otherwise it already would have done so. At least the signs should be noticeable.  In another essay I will deal with the development in China. I can tell you now, the results are not very encouraging for growing consumption. More dollar inflation will make US export cheaper, but bear in mind the whole world wants to export themselves out of the recession. And that is for sure an impossibility.

3
PIM of SPAIN

Hugh you're completely right with yr analysis. Greenspan and Bernanke kept the money for too long far too cheap, to fuel the global economy by consumers that bought with the easy money stuff the didn't need. That caused the overproduction and the bubble in the housing market. This bubble is not going to disappear overnight, it can take many years to come, likely 10 or even more.

Most of these houses were built in the wrong place, and not easy to sell. Whether you like it of not B&B have already people's future wealth sold off. Not only ours but that of the children and grand children too. The future looks far from bright in every aspect from every angle one looks at.


0
Branko

Remember Gorbatchev's 1990 nobel peace price award? One year later the USSR collapsed. 

Remember Obama's 2009 nobel peace price award? ......

0
PIM of SPAIN

That's a good one Branko, thank you.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Hugh Askew
First Flagged at 6:03 AM, Oct 10, 2009 by Hugh Askew
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (48)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from